minor
This commit is contained in:
parent
56be351f13
commit
77fe205ffe
|
|
@ -3,13 +3,45 @@
|
|||
\label{sec:intro}
|
||||
hhh~\cite{Yu:2015}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% 可以从两个方面进行考虑
|
||||
% cc的feedback，被cc的人如何回应的
|
||||
% cc的effect，对第一个review comment的影响，review 参与者 评论数的影响，甚至于pr的acceptance等的影响
|
||||
% 行文 参考 Investigating Code Review Quality: Do People and Participation Matter?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% part1： cc的feedback
|
||||
|
||||
% 段
|
||||
% code review.
|
||||
% 简介
|
||||
Code review is an important software quality assurance
|
||||
which prevents defects in the early edge of software development;
|
||||
it can reduce the bug-proneness of changed code before it is deployed
|
||||
into the production environment [].
|
||||
% 历程
|
||||
Since F... proposed the idea of formal code inspection,
|
||||
code review has been applied for *** years.
|
||||
% traditional的缺点
|
||||
In recent years, a more lightweight modern code review has emerged
|
||||
due to the evolution of [zhouminghui那个].
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% 段 pull-request的 code review in github
|
||||
In GitHub the MCR process has integrated with the pull-request development mechanism.
|
||||
% 介绍 pr的机制 以及其提交后如何引起code review
|
||||
% mcr in github具有社交化的性质
|
||||
MCR in GitHwith
|
||||
a MCR process with more social features.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% 段
|
||||
% 引入reviewer的选择，
|
||||
% 有相关研究了自动的 reviwer的推荐
|
||||
% 但是人工的审阅者问询的效果还没有好好研究，包括其feedbak和effect。
|
||||
|
||||
% 段
|
||||
% 介绍我们的研究内容
|
||||
|
||||
%段
|
||||
% 介绍我的贡献
|
||||
|
||||
% 章节介绍
|
||||
|
||||
% 对每一个项目中的每一个pr，
|
||||
% 找出 1） desc中的cc
|
||||
|
|
@ -33,12 +65,3 @@ RQ2: What feedback does CC responder give?
|
|||
% 一些人的访谈中提到了CC
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% part2： cc的effect
|
||||
|
||||
% cc是否能够影响code review的反应时间，参与者数量，评论数量
|
||||
% 或者说是 quality of code review？
|
||||
RQ3: How cc affects the participates of code review?
|
||||
|
||||
% cc是否会影响pr的acceptance
|
||||
RQ4: How cc affects the acceptance of pr?
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue