There are two different senses in which a block can be "address-taken".
There can be a BlockAddress involved, which means we need to map the
IR-level value to some specific block of machine code. Or there can be
constructs inside a function which involve using the address of a basic
block to implement certain kinds of control flow.
Mixing these together causes a problem: if target-specific passes are
marking random blocks "address-taken", if we have a BlockAddress, we
can't actually tell which MachineBasicBlock corresponds to the
BlockAddress.
So split this into two separate bits: one for BlockAddress, and one for
the machine-specific bits.
Discovered while trying to sort out related stuff on D102817.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124697
This is x86 specific, and adds statefulness to
MachineModuleInfo. Instead of explicitly tracking this, infer if we
need to declare the symbol based on the reference previously inserted.
This produces a small change in the output due to the move from
AsmPrinter::doFinalization to X86's emitEndOfAsmFile. This will now be
moved relative to other end of file fields, which I'm assuming doesn't
matter (e.g. the __morestack_addr declaration is now after the
.note.GNU-split-stack part)
This also produces another small change in code if the module happened
to define/declare __morestack_addr, but I assume that's invalid and
doesn't really matter.
This is used to emit one field in doFinalization for the module. We
can accumulate this when emitting all individual functions directly in
the AsmPrinter, rather than accumulating additional state in
MachineModuleInfo.
Move the special case behavior predicate into MachineFrameInfo to
share it. This now promotes it to generic behavior. I'm assuming this
is fine because no other target implements adjustForSegmentedStacks,
or has tests using the split-stack attribute.
This approach is used by AArch64/RISCV to make frame-setup/frame-destroy
instructions contiguous instead of being interleaved by CFI instructions. Code
checking `MBBI->getFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup) || MBBI->isCFIInstruction()`
can be simplified to just check FrameSetup.
This helps locate all CFI instructions in the prologue, which can be handy to use
.cfi_remember_state/.cfi_restore_state to decrease unwind table size (D114545).
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122541
This ensures that the Windows unwinder will work at every instruction
boundary, and allows other targets to read and write flags without
setting up a frame pointer.
Fixes GH-46875
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119391
The "-fzero-call-used-regs" option tells the compiler to zero out
certain registers before the function returns. It's also available as a
function attribute: zero_call_used_regs.
The two upper categories are:
- "used": Zero out used registers.
- "all": Zero out all registers, whether used or not.
The individual options are:
- "skip": Don't zero out any registers. This is the default.
- "used": Zero out all used registers.
- "used-arg": Zero out used registers that are used for arguments.
- "used-gpr": Zero out used registers that are GPRs.
- "used-gpr-arg": Zero out used GPRs that are used as arguments.
- "all": Zero out all registers.
- "all-arg": Zero out all registers used for arguments.
- "all-gpr": Zero out all GPRs.
- "all-gpr-arg": Zero out all GPRs used for arguments.
This is used to help mitigate Return-Oriented Programming exploits.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110869
This diff renames emitCalleeSavedFrameMoves to avoid conflicts with
non-virtual methods of derived classes having the same name but different semantics.
E.g. the class AArch64FrameLowering used to have (non-virtual) "emitCalleeSavedFrameMoves"
but it started to override TargetFrameLowering::emitCalleeSavedFrameMoves after
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c3e6555616 though its usage and semantics didn't change.
P.S. for x86 there was no conflict because the signature of
non-virtual X86FrameLowering::emitCalleeSavedFrameMoves is different
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114140
This patch is based on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99585.
While inside the stack probing loop, temporarily change the CFA
to be based on r11/eax, which are already used to hold the loop bound.
The stack pointer cannot be used for CFI here as it changes during the loop,
so it does not have a constant offset to the CFA.
Co-authored-by: YangKeao <keao.yang@yahoo.com>
Reviewed By: nagisa
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116628
MOV64ri results in a significantly longer encoding, and use of this
operator is fairly avoidable as we can always check the size of the
immediate we're using.
This is an updated version of D99045.
Co-authored-by: Simonas Kazlauskas <git@kazlauskas.me>
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116458
If we have a DYN_ALLOCA_* instruction, it will eventually be expanded to a
stack probe and subtract-from-SP. Add debug-info instrumentation to
X86FrameLowering::emitStackProbe so that it can redirect debug-info for the
DYN_ALLOCA to the lowered stack probe. In practice, this means putting an
instruction number label either the call instruction to _chkstk for win32,
or more commonly on the subtract from SP instruction. The two tests added
cover both of these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114452
Almost all of the time, call instructions don't actually lead to SP being
different after they return. An exception is win32's _chkstk, which which
implements stack probes. We need to recognise that as modifying SP, so
that copies of the value are tracked as distinct vla pointers.
This patch adds a target frame-lowering hook to see whether stack probe
functions will modify the stack pointer, store that in an internal flag,
and if it's true then scan CALL instructions to see whether they're a
stack probe. If they are, recognise them as defining a new stack-pointer
value.
The added test exercises this behaviour: two calls to _chkstk should be
considered as producing two different values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114443
We should avoid mixing old AMX instrinsic with new AMX intrinsic. For
old AMX intrinsic, user is responsible for invoking tile release. This
patch is to check if there is any tile config generated by compiler. If
so it emit tilerelease instruction, otherwise it don't emit the
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114066
Introduce a new command-line flag `-swift-async-fp={auto|always|never}`
that controls how code generation sets the Swift extended async frame
info bit. There are three possibilities:
* `auto`: which determines how to set the bit based on deployment target, either
statically or dynamically via `swift_async_extendedFramePointerFlags`.
* `always`: the default, always set the bit statically, regardless of deployment
target.
* `never`: never set the bit, regardless of deployment target.
Patch by Doug Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109392
When back-deploying Swift async code we can't always toggle the flag showing an
extended frame is present because it will confuse unwinders on systems released
before this feature. So in cases where the code might run there, we `or` in a
mask provided by the runtime (as an absolute symbol) telling us whether the
unwinders can cope.
When deploying only for newer OSs, we can still hard-code the bit-set for
greater efficiency.
On X86, the stackprobe emission code chooses the `R11D` register, which
is illegal on i686. This ends up wrapping around to `EBX`, which does
not get properly callee-saved within the stack probing prologue,
clobbering the register for the callers.
We fix this by explicitly using `EAX` as the stack probe register.
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109203
If there's a region of the stack reserved for potential tail call arguments
(only the case when we guarantee tail calls will be honoured), this is right
next to the incoming stored return address, not necessarily next to the
callee-saved area, so combining the two into a single figure leads to incorrect
offsets in some edge cases.
This was broken in ba1509da7b. The Win64
frame would not perform the setup of the Swift async context parameter
but would tear down the setup in the epilogue resulting in crashes.
This ensures that we do the full setup when we do the tear down.
Although this is non-conforming to the Win64 calling convention, it
corrects the setup and exposes the actual issue that the change
introduced: incorrect frame setup.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104246
This adds support to the X86 backend for the newly committed swiftasync
function parameter. If such a (pointer) parameter is present it gets stored
into an augmented frame record (populated in IR, but generally containing
enhanced backtrace for coroutines using lots of tail calls back and forth).
The context frame is identical to AArch64 (primarily so that unwinders etc
don't get extra complexity). Specfically, the new frame record is [AsyncCtx,
%rbp, ReturnAddr], and its presence is signalled by bit 60 of the stored %rbp
being set to 1. %rbp still points to the frame pointer in memory for backwards
compatibility (only partial on x86, but OTOH the weird AsyncCtx before the rest
of the record is because of x86).
Recommited with a fix for unwind info when i386 pc-rel thunks are
adjacent to a prologue.
This adds support to the X86 backend for the newly committed swiftasync
function parameter. If such a (pointer) parameter is present it gets stored
into an augmented frame record (populated in IR, but generally containing
enhanced backtrace for coroutines using lots of tail calls back and forth).
The context frame is identical to AArch64 (primarily so that unwinders etc
don't get extra complexity). Specfically, the new frame record is [AsyncCtx,
%rbp, ReturnAddr], and its presence is signalled by bit 60 of the stored %rbp
being set to 1. %rbp still points to the frame pointer in memory for backwards
compatibility (only partial on x86, but OTOH the weird AsyncCtx before the rest
of the record is because of x86).
Reapply rG5ed56a821c06 (after reverted by rG7aa89c4a22fd) - don't take reference from struct that will be erased in X86FrameLowering::eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr
While probing stack, the stack register is moved without dwarf
information, which could cause panic if unwind the backtrace.
This commit only add annotation for the inline stack probe case.
Dwarf information for the loop case should be done in another
patch and need further discussion.
Reviewed By: nagisa
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99579
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false.
This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to
it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it
is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore,
needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use
of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.
This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing
new names:
- shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be
realigned
- canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we
can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)
- hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target
customisable)
Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment
is required.
This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we
need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register
allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been
eliminated).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716
Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87
This is an optimized approach for D94155.
Previous code build the model that tile config register is the user of
each AMX instruction. There is a problem for the tile config register
spill. When across function, the ldtilecfg instruction may be inserted
on each AMX instruction which use tile config register. This cause all
tile data register clobber.
To fix this issue, we remove the model of tile config register. Instead,
we analyze the AMX instructions between one call to another. We will
insert ldtilecfg after the first call if we find any AMX instructions.
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95136
The unwind info format requires that all adjustments are 8 byte aligned,
and the bottom three bits are masked out. Most Win64 calling conventions
have 32 bytes of shadow stack space for spilling parameters, and I
believe that constructing these fixed stack objects had the side effect
of ensuring an alignment of 8. However, the Intel regcall convention
does not have this shadow space, so when using that convention, it was
possible to make a 4 byte stack frame, which was impossible to describe
with unwind info.
Fixes pr48867
Previous code build the model that tile config register is the user of
each AMX instruction. There is a problem for the tile config register
spill. When across function, the ldtilecfg instruction may be inserted
on each AMX instruction which use tile config register. This cause all
tile data register clobber.
To fix this issue, we remove the model of tile config register. We
analyze the regmask of call instruction and insert ldtilecfg if there is
any tile data register live across the call. Inserting the sttilecfg
before the call is unneccessary, because the tile config doesn't change
and we can just reload the config.
Besides we also need check tile config register interference. Since we
don't model the config register we should check interference from the
ldtilecfg to each tile data register def.
ldtilecfg
/ \
BB1 BB2
/ \
call BB3
/ \
%1=tileload %2=tilezero
We can start from the instruction of each tile def, and backward to
ldtilecfg. If there is any call instruction, and tile data register is
not preserved, we should insert ldtilecfg after the call instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94155
This patch implements amx programming model that discussed in llvm-dev
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-August/144302.html).
Thank Hal for the good suggestion in the RA. The fast RA is not in the patch yet.
This patch implemeted 7 components.
1. The c interface to end user.
2. The AMX intrinsics in LLVM IR.
3. Transform load/store <256 x i32> to AMX intrinsics or split the
type into two <128 x i32>.
4. The Lowering from AMX intrinsics to AMX pseudo instruction.
5. Insert psuedo ldtilecfg and build the def-use between ldtilecfg to amx
intruction.
6. The register allocation for tile register.
7. Morph AMX pseudo instruction to AMX real instruction.
Change-Id: I935e1080916ffcb72af54c2c83faa8b2e97d5cb0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87981
To accommodate frame layouts that have both fixed and scalable objects
on the stack, describing a stack location or offset using a pointer + uint64_t
is not sufficient. For this reason, we've introduced the StackOffset class,
which models both the fixed- and scalable sized offsets.
The TargetFrameLowering::getFrameIndexReference is made to return a StackOffset,
so that this can be used in other interfaces, such as to eliminate frame indices
in PEI or to emit Debug locations for variables on the stack.
This patch is purely mechanical and doesn't change the behaviour of how
the result of this function is used for fixed-sized offsets. The patch adds
various checks to assert that the offset has no scalable component, as frame
offsets with a scalable component are not yet supported in various places.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90018
The current compact unwind scheme does not work when the prologue is not at the
start (the instructions before the prologue cannot be described). (Technically
this is fixable, but it requires multiple compact unwind descriptors for one
function.)
rL255175 chose to not perform shrink-wrapping for no-frame-pointer functions not
marked as nounwind to work around PR25614. This is overly limited, as platforms
not supporting compact unwind (all non-Darwin) does not need the workaround.
This patch restricts the limitation to compact unwind platforms.
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89930
Eli Friedman