Even if the minimum number of elements is 1 and the length doesn't change,
we don't know what vscale is so we can't classify it as identity mask. Instead it
is a zero element splat.
For reverse, we shouldn't classify it as a reverse unless there are at least 2 elements
in the mask. This applies to both fixed and scalable vectors. For fixed vectors, a single
element would be an identity shuffle. For scalable vector it's a zero elt splat.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, liaolucy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124655
This got changed to use hasAttrSomewhere() during review, and I didn't
notice until today when I was writing some tests for another part of
this system that using hasAttrSomewhere only checked the callsite for
allocalign, rather than both the callsite and the definition. This fixes
that by introducing a helper method.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121641
Prior to this change, CallBase::hasFnAttr checked the called function to
see if it had an attribute if it wasn't set on the CallBase, but
getFnAttr didn't do the same delegation, which led to very confusing
behavior. This patch fixes the issue by making CallBase::getFnAttr also
check the function under the same circumstances.
Test changes look (to me) like they're cleaning up redundant attributes
which no longer get specified both on the callee and call. We also clean
up the one ad-hoc implementation of this getter over in InlineCost.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122821
This introduces a new "ptrauth" operand bundle to be used in
call/invoke. At the IR level, it's semantically equivalent to an
@llvm.ptrauth.auth followed by an indirect call, but it additionally
provides additional hardening, by preventing the intermediate raw
pointer from being exposed.
This mostly adds the IR definition, verifier checks, and support in
a couple of general helper functions. Clang IRGen and backend support
will come separately.
Note that we'll eventually want to support this bundle in indirectbr as
well, for similar reasons. indirectbr currently doesn't support bundles
at all, and the IR data structures need to be updated to allow that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113685
New method `FCmpInst::compare` is added, which evaluates the given
compare predicate for constant operands. Interface is made similar to
`ICmpInst::compare`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116168
These are deprecated and should be replaced with getAlign().
Some of these asserts don't do anything because Load/Store/AllocaInst never have a 0 align value.
When we have an actual shuffle, we can impose the additional restriction
that the mask replicates the elements of the first operand, so we know
the replication factor as a ratio of output and op0 vector sizes.
Avid readers of this saga may recall from previous installments,
that replication mask replicates (lol) each of the `VF` elements
in a vector `ReplicationFactor` times. For example, the mask for
`ReplicationFactor=3` and `VF=4` is: `<0,0,0,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3>`.
More importantly, replication mask is used by LoopVectorizer
when using masked interleaved memory operations.
As discussed in previous installments, while it is used by LV,
and we **seem** to support masked interleaved memory operations on X86,
it's support in cost model leaves a lot to be desired:
until basically yesterday even for AVX512 we had no cost model for it.
As it has been witnessed in the recent
AVX2 `X86TTIImpl::getInterleavedMemoryOpCost()`
costmodel patches, while it is hard-enough to query the cost
of a particular assembly sequence [from llvm-mca],
afterwards the check lines LV costmodel tests must be updated manually.
This is, at the very least, boring.
Okay, now we have decent costmodel coverage for interleaving shuffles,
but now basically the same mind-killing sequence has to be performed
for replication mask. I think we can improve at least the second half
of the problem, by teaching
the `TargetTransformInfoImplCRTPBase::getUserCost()` to recognize
`Instruction::ShuffleVector` that are repetition masks,
adding exhaustive test coverage
using `-cost-model -analyze` + `utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py`
This way we can have good exhaustive coverage for cost model,
and only basic coverage for the LV costmodel.
This patch adds precise undef-aware `isReplicationMask()`,
with exhaustive test coverage.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask` shows that
it correctly detects all the known masks.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask_undef`
shows that replacing some mask elements in a known replication mask
still allows us to recognize it as a replication mask.
Note, with enough undef elts, we may detect a different tuple.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask_Exhaustive_Correctness`
shows that if we detected the replication mask with given params,
then if we actually generate a true replication mask with said params,
it matches element-wise ignoring undef mask elements.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113214
As noted in https://reviews.llvm.org/D90924#inline-1076197
apparently this is a pretty common pattern,
let's not repeat it yet again, but have it in a common place.
There may be some more places where it could be used,
but these are the most obvious ones.
Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in llvm, except for the APInt
unit tests which should still test the deprecated methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110807
A logic incompleteness may lead MemorySSA to be too conservative
in its results. Specifically, when dealing with a call of kind
`call i32 bitcast (i1 (i1)* @test to i32 (i32)*)(i32 %1)`, where
the function `test` is declared with readonly attribute, the
bitcast is not looked through, obscuring function attributes. Hence,
some methods of CallBase (e.g., doesNotReadMemory) could provide
suboptimal results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109888
One of the two inputs of the Shufflevector is often a placeholder.
Previously, there were cases where the placeholder was undef, and there were cases where it was poison.
I added these constructors to create a placeholder consistently.
Changing to use the newly added constructor will be written in a separate patch.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110146
This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
Index is 0 when the return value has the returned attribute. But the
return value cannot have the returned attribute, so the check is
pointless.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109334
This patch adds an initial ShuffleVectorInst::isInsertSubvectorMask helper to recognize 2-op shuffles where the lowest elements of one of the sources are being inserted into the "in-place" other operand, this includes "concat_vectors" patterns as can be seen in the Arm shuffle cost changes. This also helped fix a x86 issue with irregular/length-changing SK_InsertSubvector costs - I'm hoping this will help with D107188
This doesn't currently attempt to work with 1-op shuffles that could either be a "widening" shuffle or a self-insertion.
The self-insertion case is tricky, but we currently always match this with the existing SK_PermuteSingleSrc logic.
The widening case will be addressed in a follow up patch that treats the cost as 0.
Masks with a high number of undef elts will still struggle to match optimal subvector widths - its currently bounded by minimum-width possible insertion, whilst some cases would benefit from wider (pow2?) subvectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107228
Add tests for D105088, as well as an option to disable the
(generally) unsound inttoptr of ptrtoint optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105771
Fix the use-list-order for br instructions by setting the operands in
order of their index to match the use-list-order prediction. The case
where this matters is when there is a condition but the if-true and
if-false branches are identical.
Bug was found when reviewing failures pointed at by
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104950. Fix is similar to
3cf415c6c3.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104959
This is a partial reapply of the original commit and the followup commit
that were previously reverted; this reapply also includes a small fix
for a potential source of non-determinism, but also has a small change
to turn off variadic debug value salvaging, to ensure that any future
revert/reapply steps to disable and renable this feature do not risk
causing conflicts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91722
This reverts commit 386b66b2fc.
Fix the use-list-order for call and invoke instructions by setting the
operands in order of their index. This matches the use-list-order
prediction. Note that the verifier precludes sharing operands in callbr
(so there was no bug to fix), but that code was updated for consistency.
Bug was found during review of https://reviews.llvm.org/D104740.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104805
This adds support for addrspace casts involving opaque pointers to
InstCombine, as well as the isEliminableCastPair() helper
(otherwise the assertion failure would just move there).
Add PointerType::hasSameElementTypeAs() to hide the element type
details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104668
> This reapplies c0f3dfb9, which was reverted following the discovery of
> crashes on linux kernel and chromium builds - these issues have since
> been fixed, allowing this patch to re-land.
This reverts commit 36ec97f76a.
The change caused non-determinism in the compiler, see comments on the code
review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D91722.
Reverting to unbreak people's builds until that can be addressed.
This also reverts the follow-up "[DebugInfo] Limit the number of values
that may be referenced by a dbg.value" in
a0bd6105d8.
FullTy is only necessary when we need to figure out what type an
instruction works with given a pointer's pointee type. However, we just
end up using the value operand's type, so FullTy isn't necessary.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102788
These checks already exist as asserts when creating the corresponding
instruction. Anybody creating these instructions already need to take
care to not break these checks.
Move the checks for success/failure ordering in cmpxchg from the
verifier to the LLParser and BitcodeReader plus an assert.
Add some tests for cmpxchg ordering. The .bc files are created from the
.ll files with an llvm-as with these checks disabled.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102803
This reapplies c0f3dfb9, which was reverted following the discovery of
crashes on linux kernel and chromium builds - these issues have since
been fixed, allowing this patch to re-land.
This reverts commit 4397b7095d.
FullTy is only necessary when we need to figure out what type an
instruction works with given a pointer's pointee type. However, we just
end up using the value operand's type, so FullTy isn't necessary.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102788
Don't check that types match when the pointer operand is an opaque
pointer.
I would separate the Assembler and Verifier changes, but
verify-uselistorder in the Assembler test ends up running the verifier.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102450
Follow up on 431e3138a and complete the other possible combinations.
Besides enforcing the new behavior, it also mitigates TSAN false positives when
combining orders that used to be stronger.
Previous build failures were caused by an error in bitcode reading and
writing for DIArgList metadata, which has been fixed in e5d844b587.
There were also some unnecessary asserts that were being triggered on
certain builds, which have been removed.
This reverts commit dad5caa59e.
during profile update.
When we inline a function and update the profile, the value profiles of the
indirect call in the inliner and inlinee will be scaled. In
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96806 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D97350, we start
using the magic number NOMORE_ICP_MAGICNUM (-1) to mark targets which have
been promoted. The magic number shouldn't be scaled during the profile update.
Although the problem has been suppressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D98187
for SampleFDO, which stops profile update for inlining in sampleFDO, the patch
is still wanted since it will be more consistent to handle the magic number
properly in profile update.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99394
Rather than special-casing assume in BasicAA getModRefBehavior(),
do this one level higher, in the attribute handling of CallBase.
For assumes with operand bundles, the inaccessiblememonly attribute
applies regardless of operand bundles.
This patch improves salvageDebugInfoImpl by allowing it to salvage arithmetic
operations with two or more non-const operands; this includes the GetElementPtr
instruction, and most Binary Operator instructions. These salvages produce
DIArgList locations and are only valid for dbg.values, as currently variadic
DIExpressions must use DW_OP_stack_value. This functionality is also only added
for salvageDebugInfoForDbgValues; other functions that directly call
salvageDebugInfoImpl (such as in ISel or Coroutine frame building) can be
updated in a later patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91722
explicitly emitting retainRV or claimRV calls in the IR
This reapplies ed4718eccb, which was reverted
because it was causing a miscompile. The bug that was causing the miscompile
has been fixed in 75805dce5f.
Original commit message:
Background:
This fixes a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
What this patch does to fix the problem:
- The front-end adds operand bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall" to calls,
which indicates the call is implicitly followed by a marker
instruction and an implicit retainRV/claimRV call that consumes the
call result. In addition, it emits a call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which consumes the call result, to
prevent the middle-end passes from changing the return type of the
called function. This is currently done only when the target is arm64
and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
- ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the calls
with the operand bundle in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
processing the function.
- ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the call with the
operand bundle. It doesn't remove the operand bundle on the call since
the backend needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV and
claimRV calls are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization
passes from transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the
ARC middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between
the call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of
PR31925).
- The function inliner removes an autoreleaseRV call in the callee if
nothing in the callee prevents it from being paired up with the
retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. It then inserts a release call if
claimRV is attached to the call since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is
equivalent to a release. If it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it
tries to transfer the operand bundle to a function call in the callee.
This is important since the ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV
returning the callee result, which makes it impossible to pair it up
with the retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply
emits a retain call in the IR if retainRV is attached to the call and
does nothing if claimRV is attached to it.
- SCCP refrains from replacing the return value of a call with a
constant value if the call has the operand bundle. This ensures the
call always has at least one user (the call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use).
- This patch also fixes a bug in replaceUsesOfNonProtoConstant where
multiple operand bundles of the same kind were being added to a call.
Future work:
- Use the operand bundle on x86-64.
- Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
calls with the operand bundles.
rdar://71443534
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
Kazu Hirata