Because ventus riscv is designed specially for OpenCL language, we originally add or remove some language features mainly for serving OpenCL, but we now need to add customized `printf` function which is expected to be written in C, so we need also to add support for C language features in current ventus
Signed-off-by: zhoujingya <jing.zhou@terapines.com>
Although i32 type is illegal in the backend, RV64I has pretty good support for i32 types by using W instructions.
By adding n32 to the DataLayout string, middle end optimizations will consider i32 to be a native type. One known effect of this is enabling LoopStrengthReduce on loops with i32 induction variables. This can be beneficial because C/C++ code often has loops with i32 induction variables due to the use of `int` or `unsigned int`.
If this patch exposes performance issues, those are better addressed by tuning LSR or other passes.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116735
This follows the path that AArch64 SVE has taken. Doing this via a function attribute set in the frontend is basically a workaround for the fact that several analyzes which need the information (i.e. known bits, lvi, scev) can't easily use TTI without significant amounts of plumbing changes.
This patch hard codes "v" numbers, and directly follows the SVE precedent as a result. In a follow up, I hope to drive this from RISCVISAInfo.h/cpp instead, but the MinVLen number being returned from that interface seemed to always be 0 (which is wrong), and I haven't figured out what's going wrong there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135894
Instead of having separate implementations for RV32 and RV64,
use the triple to control the Is64Bit parameter.
Do the same for isValidTuneCPUName, fillValidCPUList, and
fillValidTuneCPUList.
clang emit wrong code sequence for `int16`(`short`) to `__fp16` conversion,
and that should fix the code gen directly is the right way I think,
but I found there is a FIXME comment in clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h say
that's should be removed in future so I think just let swich to using
generic LLVM IR rather than llvm.convert.to.fp16 intrinsics code gen
path is enough.
```
/// Check whether llvm intrinsics such as llvm.convert.to.fp16 should be used
/// to convert to and from __fp16.
/// FIXME: This function should be removed once all targets stop using the
/// conversion intrinsics.
virtual bool useFP16ConversionIntrinsics() const {
return true;
}
```
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124509
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
How many place you need to modify when implementing a new extension for RISC-V?
At least 7 places as I know:
- Add new SubtargetFeature at RISCV.td
- -march parser in RISCV.cpp
- RISCVTargetInfo::initFeatureMap@RISCV.cpp for handling feature vector.
- RISCVTargetInfo::getTargetDefines@RISCV.cpp for pre-define marco.
- Arch string parser for ELF attribute in RISCVAsmParser.cpp
- ELF attribute emittion in RISCVAsmParser.cpp, and make sure it's in
canonical order...
- ELF attribute emittion in RISCVTargetStreamer.cpp, and again, must in
canonical order...
And now, this patch provide an unified infrastructure for handling (almost)
everything of RISC-V arch string.
After this patch, you only need to update 2 places for implement an extension
for RISC-V:
- Add new SubtargetFeature at RISCV.td, hmmm, it's hard to avoid.
- Add new entry to RISCVSupportedExtension@RISCVISAInfo.cpp or
SupportedExperimentalExtensions@RISCVISAInfo.cpp .
Most codes are come from existing -march parser, but with few new feature/bug
fixes:
- Accept version for -march, e.g. -march=rv32i2p0.
- Reject version info with `p` but without minor version number like `rv32i2p`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105168
At this point it looks like a B extension will never exist. Instead
Zba, Zbb, Zbc, and Zbs are individual extensions being ratified
together as a package. Unknown at this time when or if the other
Zb* extensions will be ratified.
This patch removes references to the B extension. I've updated and
split tests accordingly.
This has been split from D110669 to make review a little easier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111338
This consists of 3 compressed instructions, c.not, c.neg, and c.zext.w.
I believe these have been picked up by the Zce effort using different
encodings. I don't think it makes sense to keep them in bitmanip. It
will eventually cause a conflict if/when Zce is implemented in llvm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110871
The getConstraintRegister method is used by semantic checking of inline
assembly statements in order to diagnose conflicts between clobber list
and input/output lists. By overriding getConstraintRegister we get those
diagnostics and we match RISC-V GCC's behavior. The implementation is
trivial due to the lack of single-register RISC-V-specific constraints.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108624
Use _Float16 as the half-precision floating point type. Define a new
type specifier 'x' for the _Float16 type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105001
The backend can't handle this and will throw a fatal error from
type legalization. It's easy enough to fix that for this intrinsic
by just splitting the IR intrinsic since it works on individual bytes.
There will be other intrinsics in the future that would be harder
to support through splitting, for example grev, gorc, and shfl. Those
would require a compare and a select be inserted to check the MSB of
their control input.
This patch adds support for preventing this in the frontend with
a nice diagnostic.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99984
Demonstrate how to add RISC-V V builtins and lower them to IR intrinsics for V extension.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93446
Add the types for the RISC-V V extension builtins.
These types will be used by the RISC-V V intrinsics which require
types of the form <vscale x 1 x i64>(LMUL=1 element size=64) or
<vscale x 4 x i32>(LMUL=2 element size=32), etc. The vector_size
attribute does not work for us as it doesn't create a scalable
vector type. We want these types to be opaque and have no operators
defined for them. We want them to be sizeless. This makes them
similar to the ARM SVE builtin types. But we will have quite a bit
more types. This patch adds around 60. Later patches will add
another 230 or so types representing tuples of these types similar
to the x2/x3/x4 types in ARM SVE. But with extra complexity that
these types are combined with the LMUL concept that is unique to
RISCV.
For more background see this RFC
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/145850.html
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <roger.ferrer@bsc.es>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92715
This avoids having to repeat all the flags in the constructor's
initializer list in the same order. This style is already used by
several other targets.
- The goal of this patch is improve option compatible with RISCV-V GCC,
-mcpu support on GCC side will sent patch in next few days.
- -mtune only affect the pipeline model and non-arch/extension related
target feature, e.g. instruction fusion; in td file it called
TuneFeatures, which is introduced by X86 back-end[1].
- -mtune accept all valid option for -mcpu and extra alias processor
option, e.g. `generic`, `rocket` and `sifive-7-series`, the purpose is
option compatible with RISCV-V GCC.
- Processor alias for -mtune will resolve according the current target arch,
rv32 or rv64, e.g. `rocket` will resolve to `rocket-rv32` or `rocket-rv64`.
- Interaction between -mcpu and -mtune:
* -mtune has higher priority than -mcpu for pipeline model and
TuneFeatures.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89025
Summary:
1. gcc uses `-march` and `-mtune` flag to chose arch and
pipeline model, but clang does not have `-mtune` flag,
we uses `-mcpu` to chose both infos.
2. Add SiFive e31 and u54 cpu which have default march
and pipeline model.
3. Specific `-mcpu` with rocket-rv[32|64] would select
pipeline model only, and use the driver's arch choosing
logic to get default arch.
Reviewers: lenary, asb, evandro, HsiangKai
Reviewed By: lenary, asb, evandro
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71124
This is the result of an audit of all of the ABIs in clang to implement
and enable the type for those targets.
Additionally, this finds an issue with integer-promotion passing for a
few platforms when using _ExtInt of < int, so this also corrects that
resulting in signext/zeroext being on a params of those types in some
platforms.
Differential Revisions: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79118
Summary: This ensures that libcalls aren't generated when the target supports atomics. Atomics aren't in the base RV32I/RV64I instruction sets, so MaxAtomicInlineWidth and MaxAtomicPromoteWidth are set only when the atomics extension is being targeted. This must be done in setMaxAtomicWidth, as this should be done after handleTargetFeatures has been called.
Reviewers: jfb, jyknight, wmi, asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: pzheng, MaskRay, s.egerton, lenary, dexonsmith, psnobl, benna, Jim, JohnLLVM, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, lewis-revill, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57450
llvm-svn: 370073
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s)
* Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Re-landed after backing out 366450 due to missed hunks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366480
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s) * Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the
above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366450
This allows the constraints I, J & K to be used in inline asm for
RISC-V, with the following semantics (equivalent to GCC):
I: Any 12-bit signed immediate.
J: Integer zero only.
K: Any 5-bit unsigned immediate.
See the GCC definitions here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Machine-Constraints.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54091
llvm-svn: 363055
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This patch extend getTargetDefines and implement handleTargetFeatures
and hasFeature. and define corresponding marco for those features.
Reviewers: asb, apazos, eli.friedman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44727
Patch by Kito Cheng.
llvm-svn: 329278
As RV64 codegen has not yet been upstreamed into LLVM, we focus on RV32 driver
support (RV64 to follow).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39963
llvm-svn: 322276
zhoujing
Aries
Craig Topper