These 3 switches map LMUL enum to instruction names. These follow
a regular pattern. Use a macro to reduce the number of source code
lines.
Reviewed By: arcbbb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116631
For large integers (for example, magic numbers generated by
TargetLowering::BuildSDIV when dividing by constant), we may
need about 4~8 instructions to build them.
In the same time, it just takes two instructions to load
constants (with extra cycles to access memory), so it may be
profitable to put these integers into constant pool.
Reviewed By: asb, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114950
We already do this for splat nodes that carry a VL, but not for
splats that use VLMAX.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115483
D113805 improved handling of i32 divu/remu on RV64. The basic idea
from that can be extended to (mul (and X, C2), C1) where C2 is any
mask constant.
We can replace the and with an SLLI by shifting by the number of
leading zeros in C2 if we also shift C1 left by XLen - lzcnt(C1)
bits. This will give the full product XLen additional trailing zeros,
putting the result in the output of MULHU. If we can't use ANDI,
ZEXT.H, or ZEXT.W, this will avoid materializing C2 in a register.
The downside is it make take 1 additional instruction to create C1.
But since that's not on the critical path, it can hopefully be
interleaved with other operations.
The previous tablegen pattern is replaced by custom isel code.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115310
Add new hasVInstructions() which is currently equivalent.
Replace vector uses of hasStdExtZfh/F/D with new vector specific
versions. The vector spec no longer requires that the vectors implement the
same types as scalar. It only requires that the scalar type is
the maximum size the vectors can support. This is currently
implemented using the scalar rule we were using before.
Add new hasVInstructionsI64() begin using to qualify code that
requires i64 vector elements.
This is all NFC for now, but we can start using this to better
implement D112408 which introduces the Zve extensions.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, eopXD
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112496
Use SH1ADD/SH2ADD/SH3ADD along with LUI+ADDI to compose int32*3,
int32*5 and int32*9.
Reviewed By: craig.topper, luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111484
Add the tail policy argument to LLVM IR intrinsics. There are two policies for tail elements. Tail agnostic means users do not care about the values in the tail elements and tail undisturbed means the values in the tail elements need to be kept after the operation. In order to let users control the tail policy, we add an additional argument at the end of the argument list.
For unmasked operations, we have no maskedoff and the tail policy is always tail agnostic. If users want to keep tail elements under unmasked operations, they could use all one mask in the masked operations to do it. So, we only add the additional argument for masked operations for most cases. There are exceptions listed below.
In this patch, we do not handle the following cases to reduce the complexity of the patch. There could be two separate patches for them.
* Use dest argument to control tail policy
vmerge.vvm/vmerge.vxm/vmerge.vim (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vfmerge.vfm (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vmv.v.v (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vmv.v.x (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vmv.v.i (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vfmv.v.f (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vadc.vvm/vadc.vxm/vadc.vim (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vsbc.vvm/vsbc.vxm (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
* Always has tail argument for masked/unmasked intrinsics
Vector Single-Width Integer Multiply-Add Instructions (add _t and _mt builtins)
Vector Widening Integer Multiply-Add Instructions (add _t and _mt builtins)
Vector Single-Width Floating-Point Fused Multiply-Add Instructions (add _t and _mt builtins)
Vector Widening Floating-Point Fused Multiply-Add Instructions (add _t and _mt builtins)
Vector Reduction Operations (add _t and _mt builtins)
Vector Slideup Instructions (add _t and _mt builtins)
Vector Slidedown Instructions (add _t and _mt builtins)
Discussion: https://github.com/riscv/rvv-intrinsic-doc/pull/101
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105092
Turn (and (shl x, c2), c1) -> (slli (srli x, c3-c2), c3) if c1 is a
shifted mask with no leading zeros and c3 trailing zeros where c3
is greater than c2.
Turn (and (shr x, c2), c1) -> (slli (srli x, c2+c3), c3) if c1 is a
shifted mask with c2 leading zeros and c3 trailing zeros.
When the leading zeros is C2+32 we can use SRLIW in place of SRLI.
SimplifyDemandedBits can turn srl into sra if the bits being shifted
in aren't demanded. This patch can recover the original sra in some cases.
I've renamed the tablegen class for detecting W users since the "overflowing operator"
term I originally borrowed from Operator.h does not include srl.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109162
Soft deprecrate isNullValue/isAllOnesValue and update in tree
callers. This matches the changes to the APInt interface from
D109483.
Reviewed By: lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109535
If a sext_inreg is up for isel, and all its users are W instructions,
we can skip emitting the sext_inreg. This helpful if the producing
instruction can't become a W instruction.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108966
X0 has special meaning for vsetvli, we need to make sure we never
create it a vsetvli that uses it by accident. This could happen
if the register coalescer coalesces a copy from X0 into this
instruction.
This patch splits the instruction so that we can have GPRNoX0
register class to use for the cases where we don't want the source
to be X0. The verifier won't let us explicitly use X0 on a GPRNoX0
operand so we need a separate pseudo for those cases.
I don't currently have a failing example for this. There was a
failure in D107957, but the coalescable copy from that example
should have been optimized away much earlier so I've fixed that.
This is not a complete fix. We still need to prevent the same
possible issue on the AVL operand of all of the vector instruction
pseudos. I don't want to make two versions of all of those so we
need to find a different solution for those. I have an idea I'm
going to try.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109110
Let the sext_inreg be selected to sext.w. Remove unneeded sext.w
during PostProcessISelDAG.
This gives opportunities for some other isel patterns to match
like the ADDIPair or matching mul with immediate to shXadd.
This becomes possible after D107658 started selecting W instructions
based on users. The sext.w will be considered a W user so isel
will often select a W instruction for the sext.w input and we can
just remove the sext.w. Otherwise we can combine the sext.w with
a ADD/SUB/MUL/SLLI to create a new W instruction in parallel
to the the original instruction.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107708
DAGCombiner::visitStore can clear the upper bits of constants
used by stores. This leads prevents them from being recognized as
sign extended negative values making them more expensive to
materialize.
This patch uses the hasAllNBitUsers method from D107658 to make
a negative constant if none of the users care about the upper bits.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108052
We normally select these when the root node is a sext_inreg, but
SimplifyDemandedBits can sometimes bypass the sext_inreg for some
users. This can create situation where sext_inreg+add/sub/mul/shl
is selected to a W instruction, and then the add/sub/mul/shl is
separately selected to a non-W instruction with the same inputs.
This patch tries to detect when it would still be ok to use a W
instruction without the sext_inreg by checking the direct users.
This can allow the W instruction to CSE with one created for a
sext_inreg+add/sub/mul/shl. To minimize complexity and cost of
checking, we make no attempt to determine if the CSE will happen
and just always use a W instruction when we can.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107658
Replace some existing isel patterns that are covered by the new
code. SLLIUWPat has been removed in favor of folding its root case
into the new code. The other uses in isel patterns for shXadd.uw
have been switched to using hardcoded AND masks.
This is based on the original version of D49585 from ARM. The final
version of that was made a DAG combine, but I've chosen to keep it
as custom isel. I'm not convinced DAG combine is as good with
shift pairs as it is with and+shift. I saw some issues optimizing
the shifts created by vscale lowering if an and isn't created for
from a shift pair.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106230
If the upper 32 bits are zero and bit 31 is set, we might be able to
use zext.w to fill in the zeros after using an lui and/or addi.
Most of this patch is plumbing the subtarget features into the constant
materialization.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105509
This helps us select W instructions in more cases. Most of the
affected tests have had the sign_extend_inreg or AND folded into
sextload/zextload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104079
This uses 3 bits of data instead of 7. I'm wondering if we can use
bitfields for the lookup table key where this would matter.
I also name the shift_amount template to log2 since it is used
with more than just an srl now.
All that really matters is that the VLMAX of the preceding
instructions is the same as the VLMAX required by the mask
operation.
Also update the vmsge(u) handling to use the SEW/LMUL we use for
other mask register operations. We were matching it to the compare
before. Some cases will be improve if we fix masked compares to
use tail agnostic policy. I think they ignore the tail policy
anyway.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103299
SEW=64 shifts only uses the log2(64) bits of shift amount. If we're
splatting a 64 bit value in 2 parts, we can avoid splatting the
upper bits and just let the low bits be sign extended. They won't
be read anyway.
For the purposes of SelectionDAG semantics of the generic ISD opcodes,
if hi was non-zero or bit 31 of the low is 1, the shift was already
undefined so it should be ok to replace high with sign extend of low.
In order do be able to find the split i64 value before it becomes
a stack operation, I added a new ISD opcode that will be expanded
to the stack spill in PreprocessISelDAG. This new node is conceptually
similar to BuildPairF64, but I expanded earlier so that we could
go through regular isel to get the right VLSE opcode for the LMUL.
BuildPairF64 is expanded in a CustomInserter.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102521
The ComplexPattern is looking for an immediate in a certain range
that has a single use. This can be handled with a PatLeaf since
we aren't matching multiple patterns or checking any complicated
relationships between nodes.
This shrinks the isel table a little bit since tablegen no longer
has to generate patterns with commuted operands. With the PatLeaf,
tablegen can see we're matching an immediate which should always
be on the right hand side of add.
Reviewed By: benshi001
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102510
The VSEW encoding isn't a useful value to pass around. It's better
to use SEW or log2(SEW) directly. The only real ugliness is that
the vsetvli IR intrinsics use the VSEW encoding, but it's easy
enough to decode that when the intrinsic is processed.
This shrinks the immediate that isel table needs to emit for these
instructions. Hoping this allows me to change OPC_EmitInteger to
use a better variable length encoding for representing negative
numbers. Similar to what was done a few months ago for OPC_CheckInteger.
The alternative encoding uses less bytes for negative numbers, but
increases the number of bytes need to encode 64 which was a very
common number in the RISCV table due to SEW=64. By using Log2 this
becomes 6 and is no longer a problem.
This adds a special operand type that is allowed to be either
an immediate or register. By giving it a unique operand type the
machine verifier will ignore it.
This perturbs a lot of tests but mostly it is just slightly different
instruction orders. Something bad did happen to some min/max reduction
tests. We're spilling vector registers when we weren't before.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101246
This modifies my previous patch to push the strided load formation
to isel. This gives us opportunity to fold the splat into a .vx
operation first. Using a scalar register and a .vx operation reduces
vector register pressure which can be important for larger LMULs.
If we can't fold the splat into a .vx operation, then it can make
sense to use a strided load to free up the vector arithmetic
ALU to do actual arithmetic rather than tying it up with vmv.v.x.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101138
We can have RISCVISelDAGToDAG.cpp call the VT only version by
finding the RISCVTargetLowering object via the Subtarget.
Make the static versions just global static functions in
RISCVISelLowering that can be called by static functions in that
file.
These instructions don't really exist, but we have ways we can
emulate them.
.vv will swap operands and use vmsle().vv. .vi will adjust the
immediate and use .vmsgt(u).vi when possible. For .vx we need to
use some of the multiple instruction sequences from the V extension
spec.
For unmasked vmsge(u).vx we use:
vmslt{u}.vx vd, va, x; vmnand.mm vd, vd, vd
For cases where mask and maskedoff are the same value then we have
vmsge{u}.vx v0, va, x, v0.t which is the vd==v0 case that
requires a temporary so we use:
vmslt{u}.vx vt, va, x; vmandnot.mm vd, vd, vt
For other masked cases we use this sequence:
vmslt{u}.vx vd, va, x, v0.t; vmxor.mm vd, vd, v0
We trust that register allocation will prevent vd in vmslt{u}.vx
from being v0 since v0 is still needed by the vmxor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100925
This patch adds more optimized codegen for the above SETCC forms,
by matching the '.vi' vector forms when the immediate is a 5-bit signed
immediate plus 1. The immediate can be decremented and the corresponding
SET[U]LE or SET[U]GT forms can be matched.
This work was left as a TODO from D94168.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100096
Many of the operands are handled the same or in the same order
for all these intrinsics. Factor out the code for selecting and
pushing them into the Operands vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99923
I missed a few intrinsics in 3dd4aa7d09
when I did this for masked loads and masked segment loads/stores.
Found while trying to share more code between these custom isel
functions.
This adds a new integer materialization strategy mainly targeted
at 64-bit constants like 0xffffffff where there are 32 or more trailing
ones with leading zeros. We can materialize these by using an addi -1
and srli to restore the leading zeros. This matches what gcc does.
I haven't limited to just these cases though. The implementation
here takes the constant, shifts out all the leading zeros and
shifts ones into the LSBs, creates the new sequence, adds an srli,
and checks if this is shorter than our original strategy.
I've separated the recursive portion into a standalone function
so I could append the new strategy outside of the recursion. Since
external users are no longer using the recursive function, I've
cleaned up the external interface to return the sequence instead of
taking a vector by reference.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98821
This matches what we do in our isel patterns. In our internal
testing we've found this is needed to make the fast register
allocator happy at -O0. Otherwise it may assign V0 to an earlier
operand and find itself with no registers left when it reaches
the mask operand. By using V0 explicitly, the fast register allocator
will see it when it checks for phys register usages before it
starts allocating vregs. I'll try to update this with a test case.
Unfortunately, this does appear to prevent some instruction reordering
by the pre-RA scheduler which leads to the increased spills seen in
some tests. I suspect that problem could already occur for other
instructions that already used V0 directly.
There's a lot of repeated code here that could do with some
wrapper functions. Not sure if that should be at the level of the
new code that deals with V0. That would require multiple output
parameters to pass the glue, chain and register back. Maybe it
should be at a higher level over the entire set of push_backs.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99367
jacquesguan