Instead of dumping the string literal (which
quotes it and escape every non-ascii symbol),
we can use the content of the string when it is a
8 byte string.
Wide, UTF-8/UTF-16/32 strings are still completely
escaped, until we clarify how these entities should
behave (cf https://wg21.link/p2361).
`FormatDiagnostic` is modified to escape
non printable characters and invalid UTF-8.
This ensures that unicode characters, spaces and new
lines are properly rendered in static messages.
This make clang more consistent with other implementation
and fixes this tweet
https://twitter.com/jfbastien/status/1298307325443231744 :)
Of note, `PaddingChecker` did print out new lines that were
later removed by the diagnostic printing code.
To be consistent with its tests, the new lines are removed
from the diagnostic.
Unicode tables updated to both use the Unicode definitions
and the Unicode 14.0 data.
U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN is still considered a print character
to match existing practices in terminals, in addition of
being considered a formatting character as per Unicode.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108469
Instead of dumping the string literal (which
quotes it and escape every non-ascii symbol),
we can use the content of the string when it is a
8 byte string.
Wide, UTF-8/UTF-16/32 strings are still completely
escaped, until we clarify how these entities should
behave (cf https://wg21.link/p2361).
`FormatDiagnostic` is modified to escape
non printable characters and invalid UTF-8.
This ensures that unicode characters, spaces and new
lines are properly rendered in static messages.
This make clang more consistent with other implementation
and fixes this tweet
https://twitter.com/jfbastien/status/1298307325443231744 :)
Of note, `PaddingChecker` did print out new lines that were
later removed by the diagnostic printing code.
To be consistent with its tests, the new lines are removed
from the diagnostic.
Unicode tables updated to both use the Unicode definitions
and the Unicode 14.0 data.
U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN is still considered a print character
to match existing practices in terminals, in addition of
being considered a formatting character as per Unicode.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108469
This patch implements a necessary part of P0848, the overload resolution for destructors.
It is now possible to overload destructors based on constraints, and the eligible destructor
will be selected at the end of the class.
The approach this patch takes is to perform the overload resolution in Sema::ActOnFields
and to mark the selected destructor using a new property in FunctionDeclBitfields.
CXXRecordDecl::getDestructor is then modified to use this property to return the correct
destructor.
This closes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45614.
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126194
From [class.copy.ctor]:
```
A non-template constructor for class X is a copy constructor if its first
parameter is of type X&, const X&, volatile X& or const volatile X&, and
either there are no other parameters or else all other parameters have
default arguments (9.3.4.7).
A copy/move constructor for class X is trivial if it is not user-provided and if:
- class X has no virtual functions (11.7.3) and no virtual base classes (11.7.2), and
- the constructor selected to copy/move each direct base class subobject is trivial, and
- or each non-static data member of X that is of class type (or array thereof),
the constructor selected to copy/move that member is trivial;
otherwise the copy/move constructor is non-trivial.
```
So `T(T&) = default`; should be trivial assuming that the previous
provisions are met.
This works in GCC, but not in Clang at the moment:
https://godbolt.org/z/fTGe71b6P
Reviewed By: royjacobson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127593
For backwards compatiblity, we emit only a warning instead of an error if the
attribute is one of the existing type attributes that we have historically
allowed to "slide" to the `DeclSpec` just as if it had been specified in GNU
syntax. (We will call these "legacy type attributes" below.)
The high-level changes that achieve this are:
- We introduce a new field `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (with appropriate
accessors) to store C++11 attributes occurring in the attribute-specifier-seq
at the beginning of a simple-declaration (and other similar declarations).
Previously, these attributes were placed on the `DeclSpec`, which made it
impossible to reconstruct later on whether the attributes had in fact been
placed on the decl-specifier-seq or ahead of the declaration.
- In the parser, we propgate declaration attributes and decl-specifier-seq
attributes separately until we can place them in
`Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` or `DeclSpec::Attrs`, respectively.
- In `ProcessDeclAttributes()`, in addition to processing declarator attributes,
we now also process the attributes from `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (except
if they are legacy type attributes).
- In `ConvertDeclSpecToType()`, in addition to processing `DeclSpec` attributes,
we also process any legacy type attributes that occur in
`Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (and emit a warning).
- We make `ProcessDeclAttribute` emit an error if it sees any non-declaration
attributes in C++11 syntax, except in the following cases:
- If it is being called for attributes on a `DeclSpec` or `DeclaratorChunk`
- If the attribute is a legacy type attribute (in which case we only emit
a warning)
The standard justifies treating attributes at the beginning of a
simple-declaration and attributes after a declarator-id the same. Here are some
relevant parts of the standard:
- The attribute-specifier-seq at the beginning of a simple-declaration
"appertains to each of the entities declared by the declarators of the
init-declarator-list" (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-3)
- "In the declaration for an entity, attributes appertaining to that entity can
appear at the start of the declaration and after the declarator-id for that
declaration." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-note-2)
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq following a declarator-id appertains to
the entity that is declared."
(https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.meaning.general-1)
The standard contains similar wording to that for a simple-declaration in other
similar types of declarations, for example:
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in a parameter-declaration appertains to
the parameter." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct#3)
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in an exception-declaration appertains
to the parameter of the catch clause" (https://eel.is/c++draft/except.pre#1)
The new behavior is tested both on the newly added type attribute
`annotate_type`, for which we emit errors, and for the legacy type attribute
`address_space` (chosen somewhat randomly from the various legacy type
attributes), for which we emit warnings.
Depends On D111548
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126061
This reverts commit 3988bd1398.
Did not build on this bot:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/215/builds/6372
/usr/include/c++/9/bits/predefined_ops.h:177:11: error: no match for call to
‘(llvm::less_first) (std::pair<long unsigned int, llvm::bolt::BinaryBasicBlock*>&, const std::pair<long unsigned int, std::nullptr_t>&)’
177 | { return bool(_M_comp(*__it, __val)); }
One could reuse this functor instead of rolling out your own version.
There were a couple other cases where the code was similar, but not
quite the same, such as it might have an assertion in the lambda or other
constructs. Thus, I've not touched any of those, as it might change the
behavior in some way.
As per https://discourse.llvm.org/t/submitting-simple-nfc-patches/62640/3?u=steakhal
Chris Lattner
> LLVM intentionally has a “yes, you can apply common sense judgement to
> things” policy when it comes to code review. If you are doing mechanical
> patches (e.g. adopting less_first) that apply to the entire monorepo,
> then you don’t need everyone in the monorepo to sign off on it. Having
> some +1 validation from someone is useful, but you don’t need everyone
> whose code you touch to weigh in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126068
Const class members may be initialized with a defaulted default
constructor under the same conditions it would be allowed for a const
object elsewhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126170
Before C++20, MSVC was supporting not mentioning the template argument of the base class when initializing a class inheriting a templated base class.
So the following code compiled correctly:
```
template <class T>
class Base {
};
template <class T>
class Derived : public Base<T> {
public:
Derived() : Base() {}
};
void test() {
Derived<int> d;
}
```
See https://godbolt.org/z/Pxxe7nccx for a conformance view.
This patch adds support for such construct when in MSVC compatibility mode.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124666
HLSL doesn't support access specifiers. This change has two components:
1) Make default access for classes public
2) Diagnose the use of access specifiers as a clang HLSL extension
As long as the default behavior for access specifiers matches HLSL,
allowing them to be used doesn't cause sourece incompatability with
valid code. As such enabling them as a clang extension seems like a
reasonable approach.
Fixes#55124
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124487
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
We did not implement C99 6.7.5.3p15 fully in that we missed the rule
for compatible function types where a prior declaration has a prototype
and a subsequent definition (not just declaration) has an empty
identifier list or an identifier list with a mismatch in parameter
arity. This addresses that situation by issuing an error on code like:
void f(int);
void f() {} // type conflicts with previous declaration
(Note: we already diagnose the other type conflict situations
appropriately, this was the only situation we hadn't covered that I
could find.)
It breaks arm build, there is no free bit for the extra
UsingShadowDecl in TemplateName::StorageType.
Reverting it to build the buildbot back until we comeup with a fix.
This reverts commit 5a5be4044f.
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
According to CWG 1394 and C++20 [dcl.fct.def.general]p2,
Clang should not diagnose incomplete types if function body is "= delete;".
For example:
```
struct Incomplete;
Incomplete f(Incomplete) = delete; // well-formed
```
Also close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52802
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122981
Move the SourceRange from the old ParsedAttributesWithRange into
ParsedAttributesView, so we have source range information available
everywhere we use attributes.
This also removes ParsedAttributesWithRange (replaced by simply using
ParsedAttributes) and ParsedAttributesVieWithRange (replaced by using
ParsedAttributesView).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121201
Allow goto, labelled statements as well as `static`, `thread_local`, and
non-literal variables in `constexpr` functions.
As specified. for all of the above (except labelled statements) constant
evaluation of the construct still fails.
For `constexpr` bodies, the proposal is implemented with diagnostics as
a language extension in older language modes. For determination of
whether a lambda body satisfies the requirements for a constexpr
function, the proposal is implemented only in C++2b mode to retain the
semantics of older modes for programs conforming to them.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, hubert.reinterpretcast, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111400
Implement P2128R6 in C++23 mode.
Unlike GCC's implementation, this doesn't try to recover when a user
meant to use a comma expression.
Because the syntax changes meaning in C++23, the patch is *NOT*
implemented as an extension. Instead, declaring an array with not
exactly 1 parameter is an error in older languages modes. There is an
off-by-default extension warning in C++23 mode.
Unlike the standard, we supports default arguments;
Ie, we assume, based on conversations in WG21, that the proposed
resolution to CWG2507 will be accepted.
We allow arrays OpenMP sections and C++23 multidimensional array to
coexist:
[a , b] multi dimensional array
[a : b] open mp section
[a, b: c] // error
The rest of the patch is relatively straight forward: we take care to
support an arbitrary number of arguments everywhere.
This fixes bug 47716.
According to [module.interface]p2, it is meaningless to export an entity
which is not in namespace scope.
The reason why the compiler crashes is that the compiler missed
ExportDecl when the compiler traverse the subclass of DeclContext. So
here is the crash.
Also, the patch implements [module.interface]p6 in
Sema::CheckRedeclaration* functions.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112903
Commit 5fbe21a774 missed committing the correct checking of
out-of-class comparision operator argument types. These are they,
from the originally posted diff.
Reviewed By: mizvekov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115894
This implements p2085, allowing out-of-class defaulting of comparison
operators, primarily so they need not be inline, IIUC intent. this was
mostly straigh forward, but required reimplementing
Sema::CheckExplicitlyDefaultedComparison, as now there's a case where
we have no a priori clue as to what class a defaulted comparison may
be for. We have to inspect the parameter types to find out. Eg:
class X { ... };
bool operator==(X, X) = default;
Thus reimplemented the parameter type checking, and added 'is this a
friend' functionality for the above case.
Reviewed By: mizvekov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104478
Previously we would create global module fragment for extern linkage
declaration which is alreday in global module fragment. However, it is
clearly redundant to do so. This patch would check if the extern linkage
declaration are already in GMF before we create a GMF for it.
According to [module.unit]p7.2.3, a declaration within a linkage-specification
should be attached to the global module.
This let user to forward declare types across modules.
Reviewed by: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110215
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
There's a nuanced check about when to use suffixes on these integer
non-type-template-parameters, but when rebuilding names for
-gsimple-template-names there isn't enough data in the DWARF to
determine when to use suffixes or not. So turn on suffixes always to
make it easy to match up names in llvm-dwarfdump --verify.
I /think/ if we correctly modelled auto non-type-template parameters
maybe we could put suffixes only on those. But there's also some logic
in Clang that puts the suffixes on overloaded functions - at least
that's what the parameter says (see D77598 and printTemplateArguments
"TemplOverloaded" parameter) - but I think maybe it's for anything that
/can/ be overloaded, not necessarily only the things that are overloaded
(the argument value is hardcoded at the various callsites, doesn't seem
to depend on overload resolution/searching for overloaded functions). So
maybe with "auto" modeled more accurately, and differentiating between
function templates (always using type suffixes there) and class/variable
templates (only using the suffix for "auto" types) we could correctly
use integer type suffixes only in the minimal set of cases.
But that seems all too much fuss, so let's just put integer type
suffixes everywhere always in the debug info of integer non-type
template parameters in template names.
(more context:
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D77598#inline-1057607
* https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/ekLMllbLIZg/m/-dhJ0hO1AAAJ )
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111477
It isn't really pulling its weight and I think splitting it out from
-Wweak-vtables was the wrong call: I think it was just a bug in the
original warning, which was trying to not diagnose template
instantiations, implicit or explicit.
Corentin Jabot