This switches everything to use the memory attribute proposed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-unify-memory-effect-attributes/65579.
The old argmemonly, inaccessiblememonly and inaccessiblemem_or_argmemonly
attributes are dropped. The readnone, readonly and writeonly attributes
are restricted to parameters only.
The old attributes are auto-upgraded both in bitcode and IR.
The bitcode upgrade is a policy requirement that has to be retained
indefinitely. The IR upgrade is mainly there so it's not necessary
to update all tests using memory attributes in this patch, which
is already large enough. We could drop that part after migrating
tests, or retain it longer term, to make it easier to import IR
from older LLVM versions.
High-level Function/CallBase APIs like doesNotAccessMemory() or
setDoesNotAccessMemory() are mapped transparently to the memory
attribute. Code that directly manipulates attributes (e.g. via
AttributeList) on the other hand needs to switch to working with
the memory attribute instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135780
For MTE globals, we should have clang emit the attribute for all GV's
that it creates, and then use that in the upcoming AArch64 global
tagging IR pass. We need a positive attribute for this sanitizer (rather
than implicit sanitization of all globals) because it needs to interact
with other parts of LLVM, including:
1. Suppressing certain global optimisations (like merging),
2. Emitting extra directives by the ASM writer, and
3. Putting extra information in the symbol table entries.
While this does technically make the LLVM IR / bitcode format
non-backwards-compatible, nobody should have used this attribute yet,
because it's a no-op.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128950
This patch adds the support for `fmax` and `fmin` operations in `atomicrmw`
instruction. For now (at least in this patch), the instruction will be expanded
to CAS loop. There are already a couple of targets supporting the feature. I'll
create another patch(es) to enable them accordingly.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127041
Plan is the migrate the global variable metadata for sanitizers, that's
currently carried around generally in the 'llvm.asan.globals' section,
onto the global variable itself.
This patch adds the attribute and plumbs it through the LLVM IR and
bitcode formats, but is a no-op other than that so far.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, kstoimenov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126100
I chose to encode the allockind information in a string constant because
otherwise we would get a bit of an explosion of keywords to deal with
the possible permutations of allocation function types.
I'm not sure that CodeGen.h is the correct place for this enum, but it
seemed to kind of match the UWTableKind enum so I put it in the same
place. Constructive suggestions on a better location most certainly
encouraged.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123088
This adds support for pointer types for `atomic xchg` and let us write
instructions such as `atomicrmw xchg i64** %0, i64* %1 seq_cst`. This
is similar to the patch for allowing atomicrmw xchg on floating point
types: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52416.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124728
This continues the push away from hard-coded knowledge about functions
towards attributes. We'll use this to annotate free(), realloc() and
cousins and obviate the hard-coded list of free functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123083
This will let us start moving away from hard-coded attributes in
MemoryBuiltins.cpp and put the knowledge about various attribute
functions in the compilers that emit those calls where it probably
belongs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117921
Currently adding attribute no_sanitize("bounds") isn't disabling
-fsanitize=local-bounds (also enabled in -fsanitize=bounds). The Clang
frontend handles fsanitize=array-bounds which can already be disabled by
no_sanitize("bounds"). However, instrumentation added by the
BoundsChecking pass in the middle-end cannot be disabled by the
attribute.
The fix is very similar to D102772 that added the ability to selectively
disable sanitizer pass on certain functions.
In this patch, if no_sanitize("bounds") is provided, an additional
function attribute (NoSanitizeBounds) is attached to IR to let the
BoundsChecking pass know we want to disable local-bounds checking. In
order to support this feature, the IR is extended (similar to D102772)
to make Clang able to preserve the information and let BoundsChecking
pass know bounds checking is disabled for certain function.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119816
Verify that the resolver exists, that it is a defined
Function, and that its return type matches the ifunc's
type. Add corresponding check to BitcodeReader, change
clang to emit the correct type, and fix tests to comply.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112349
The purpose of __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)) is to
prevent all kinds of sanitizer instrumentation applied to a certain
function, Objective-C method, or global variable.
The no_sanitize(...) attribute drops instrumentation checks, but may
still insert code preventing false positive reports. In some cases
though (e.g. when building Linux kernel with -fsanitize=kernel-memory
or -fsanitize=thread) the users may want to avoid any kind of
instrumentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108029
In the textual format, `noduplicates` means no COMDAT/section group
deduplication is performed. Therefore, if both sets of sections are retained, and
they happen to define strong external symbols with the same names,
there will be a duplicate definition linker error.
In PE/COFF, the selection kind lowers to `IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_NODUPLICATES`.
The name describes the corollary instead of the immediate semantics. The name
can cause confusion to other binary formats (ELF, wasm) which have implemented/
want to implement the "no deduplication" selection kind. Rename it to be clearer.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106319
We really ought to support no_sanitize("coverage") in line with other
sanitizers. This came up again in discussions on the Linux-kernel
mailing lists, because we currently do workarounds using objtool to
remove coverage instrumentation. Since that support is only on x86, to
continue support coverage instrumentation on other architectures, we
must support selectively disabling coverage instrumentation via function
attributes.
Unfortunately, for SanitizeCoverage, it has not been implemented as a
sanitizer via fsanitize= and associated options in Sanitizers.def, but
rolls its own option fsanitize-coverage. This meant that we never got
"automatic" no_sanitize attribute support.
Implement no_sanitize attribute support by special-casing the string
"coverage" in the NoSanitizeAttr implementation. To keep the feature as
unintrusive to existing IR generation as possible, define a new negative
function attribute NoSanitizeCoverage to propagate the information
through to the instrumentation pass.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49035
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102772
Swift's new concurrency features are going to require guaranteed tail calls so
that they don't consume excessive amounts of stack space. This would normally
mean "tailcc", but there are also Swift-specific ABI desires that don't
naturally go along with "tailcc" so this adds another calling convention that's
the combination of "swiftcc" and "tailcc".
Support is added for AArch64 and X86 for now.
This extends any frame record created in the function to include that
parameter, passed in X22.
The new record looks like [X22, FP, LR] in memory, and FP is stored with 0b0001
in bits 63:60 (CodeGen assumes they are 0b0000 in normal operation). The effect
of this is that tools walking the stack should expect to see one of three
values there:
* 0b0000 => a normal, non-extended record with just [FP, LR]
* 0b0001 => the extended record [X22, FP, LR]
* 0b1111 => kernel space, and a non-extended record.
All other values are currently reserved.
If compiling for arm64e this context pointer is address-discriminated with the
discriminator 0xc31a and the DB (process-specific) key.
There is also an "i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()" intrinsic providing
front-ends access to this slot (and forcing its creation initialized to nullptr
if necessary).
When we pass a AArch64 Homogeneous Floating-Point
Aggregate (HFA) argument with increased alignment
requirements, for example
struct S {
__attribute__ ((__aligned__(16))) double v[4];
};
Clang uses `[4 x double]` for the parameter, which is passed
on the stack at alignment 8, whereas it should be at
alignment 16, following Rule C.4 in
AAPCS (https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/master/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst#642parameter-passing-rules)
Currently we don't have a way to express in LLVM IR the
alignment requirements of the function arguments. The align
attribute is applicable to pointers only, and only for some
special ways of passing arguments (e..g byval). When
implementing AAPCS32/AAPCS64, clang resorts to dubious hacks
of coercing to types, which naturally have the needed
alignment. We don't have enough types to cover all the
cases, though.
This patch introduces a new use of the stackalign attribute
to control stack slot alignment, when and if an argument is
passed in memory.
The attribute align is left as an optimizer hint - it still
applies to pointer types only and pertains to the content of
the pointer, whereas the alignment of the pointer itself is
determined by the stackalign attribute.
For byval arguments, the stackalign attribute assumes the
role, previously perfomed by align, falling back to align if
stackalign` is absent.
On the clang side, when passing arguments using the "direct"
style (cf. `ABIArgInfo::Kind`), now we can optionally
specify an alignment, which is emitted as the new
`stackalign` attribute.
Patch by Momchil Velikov and Lucas Prates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98794
I think byval/sret and the others are close to being able to rip out
the code to support the missing type case. A lot of this code is
shared with inalloca, so catch this up to the others so that can
happen.
This is a follow up patch to D83136 adding the align attribute to `cmpxchg`.
See also D83465 for `atomicrmw`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87443
Currently the backend special cases x86_intrcc and treats the first
parameter as byval. Make the IR require byval for this parameter to
remove this special case, and avoid the dependence on the pointee
element type.
Fixes bug 46672.
I'm not sure the IR is enforcing all the calling convention
constraints. clang seems to ignore the attribute for empty parameter
lists, but the IR tolerates it.
Define ConstantData::PoisonValue.
Add support for poison value to LLLexer/LLParser/BitcodeReader/BitcodeWriter.
Add support for poison value to llvm-c interface.
Add support for poison value to OCaml binding.
Add m_Poison in PatternMatch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71126
Add a calling convention called amdgpu_gfx for real function calls
within graphics shaders. For the moment, this uses the same calling
convention as other calls in amdgpu, with registers excluded for return
address, stack pointer and stack buffer descriptor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88540
D70365 allows us to make attributes default. This is a follow up to
actually make nosync, nofree and willreturn default. The approach we
chose, for now, is to opt-in to default attributes to avoid introducing
problems to target specific intrinsics. Intrinsics with default
attributes can be created using `DefaultAttrsIntrinsic` class.
This reverts commit 55c4ff91bd.
Issues were introduced as discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D88241
where this change made previous bugs in the linker and BitCodeWriter
visible.
Make the corresponding change that was made for byval in
b7141207a4. Like byval, this requires a
bulk update of the test IR tests to include the type before this can
be mandatory.
Summary:
This patch redefines freeze instruction from being UnaryOperator to a subclass of UnaryInstruction.
ConstantExpr freeze is removed, as discussed in the previous review.
FreezeOperator is not added because there's no ConstantExpr freeze.
`freeze i8* null` test is added to `test/Bindings/llvm-c/freeze.ll` as well, because the null pointer-related bug in `tools/llvm-c/echo.cpp` is now fixed.
InstVisitor has visitFreeze now because freeze is not unaryop anymore.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix, craig.topper, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: craig.topper, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: regehr, nlopes, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69932
Summary:
This extends the rules for when a call instruction is deemed to be an
FPMathOperator, which is based on the type of the call (i.e. the return
type of the function being called). Previously we only allowed
floating-point and vector-of-floating-point types. Now we also allow
arrays (nested to any depth) of floating-point and
vector-of-floating-point types.
This was motivated by llpc, the pipeline compiler for AMD GPUs
(https://github.com/GPUOpen-Drivers/llpc). llpc has many math library
functions that operate on vectors, typically represented as <4 x float>,
and some that operate on matrices, typically represented as
[4 x <4 x float>], and it's useful to be able to decorate calls to all
of them with fast math flags.
Reviewers: spatel, wristow, arsenm, hfinkel, aemerson, efriedma, cameron.mcinally, mcberg2017, jmolloy
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69161
In particular, the function definition is not marked strictfp despite
containing a function marked strictfp. Also, if any function call is marked
strictfp then all function calls in that function must be marked.
This change to move the one strictfp call to a new properly marked function
meets all the new rules.
Tested with a stricter version of D68233.
Reviewed by: spatel
Approved by: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68713
llvm-svn: 374186
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select':
D61917 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917>
As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value
because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical
inconsistency such as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most
unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang).
Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because
SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal
example like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535
But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF
propagation and start solving cases like that.
The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a
regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any
FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math
instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it
may be safe to remove that hack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564
llvm-svn: 372878
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select':
D61917
As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value
because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical
inconsistency such as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most
unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang).
Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because
SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal
example like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535
But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF
propagation and start solving cases like that.
The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a
regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any
FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math
instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it
may be safe to remove that hack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564
llvm-svn: 372866
Summary:
In D62801, new function attribute `willreturn` was introduced. In short, a function with `willreturn` is guaranteed to come back to the call site(more precise definition is in LangRef).
In this patch, willreturn is annotated for LLVM intrinsics.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, sstefan1, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64904
llvm-svn: 367184
Reintroduces the scalable vector IR type from D32530, after it was reverted
a couple of times due to increasing chromium LTO build times. This latest
incarnation removes the walk over aggregate types from the verifier entirely,
in favor of rejecting scalable vectors in the isValidElementType methods in
ArrayType and StructType. This removes the 70% degradation observed with
the second repro tarball from PR42210.
Reviewers: thakis, hans, rengolin, sdesmalen
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64079
llvm-svn: 365203
We saw a 70% ThinLTO link time increase in Chromium for Android, see
crbug.com/978817. Sounds like more of PR42210.
> Recommit of D32530 with a few small changes:
> - Stopped recursively walking through aggregates in
> the verifier, so that we don't impose too much
> overhead on large modules under LTO (see PR42210).
> - Changed tests to match; the errors are slightly
> different since they only report the array or
> struct that actually contains a scalable vector,
> rather than all aggregates which contain one in
> a nested member.
> - Corrected an older comment
>
> Reviewers: thakis, rengolin, sdesmalen
>
> Reviewed By: sdesmalen
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63321
llvm-svn: 364543
Recommit of D32530 with a few small changes:
- Stopped recursively walking through aggregates in
the verifier, so that we don't impose too much
overhead on large modules under LTO (see PR42210).
- Changed tests to match; the errors are slightly
different since they only report the array or
struct that actually contains a scalable vector,
rather than all aggregates which contain one in
a nested member.
- Corrected an older comment
Reviewers: thakis, rengolin, sdesmalen
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63321
llvm-svn: 363658
Nikita Popov