Following the comment's thread of D117235, I added checks for the widening + splitting case, which also causes a split with one of the resulting vectors to be empty. Due to the same issues described in that same thread, the `fixed-vectors-strided-store.ll` test is missing the widening + splitting case, while the same case in the `strided-vpload.ll` test requires to manually split the loaded vector.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121784
Test for a case we observed after the initial implementation of D129997
landed, in which case we observed a crash while building the ppc64le
Linux kernel. In that case, we had one block with two exits, both to the
same successor. Removing one of the exits corrupted the
successor/predecessor lists.
So when we have an INLINEASM_BR, check a few things for each indirect
target:
1. that it exists.
2. that it is listed in our successors.
3. that its predecessor list contains the parent MBB of INLINEASM_BR.
This would have caught the regression discovered after D129997 landed,
after the pass that was problematic (early-tailduplication) rather than
getting a stack trace in a later pass (regalloc) that doesn't understand
the anomaly and crashes.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130290
Registers used for arguments are listed as "live-ins" into the starting
basic block. This means we don't have to go through a potentially
expensive search through all possible argument registers when we only
care about used argument registers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132181
This patch introduces the priority analysis and the priority advisor,
the default implementation, and the scaffolding for introducing the
other implementations of the advisor.
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131220
Extends findMoreOptimalIndexType to allow ISD::BUILD_VECTOR based
indices to be truncated when such truncation is lossless. This can
enable the use of 32bit gather/scatter indices thus making it less
likely to have to split a gather/scatter in two.
Depends on D125194
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130533
* Replace getUserCost with getInstructionCost, covering all cost kinds.
* Remove getInstructionLatency, it's not implemented by any backends, and we should fold the functionality into getUserCost (now getInstructionCost) to make it easier for targets to handle the cost kinds with their existing cost callbacks.
Original Patch by @samparker (Sam Parker)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79483
TragetLowering had two last InstructionCost related `getTypeLegalizationCost()`
and `getScalingFactorCost()` members, but all other costs are processed in TTI.
E.g. it is not comfortable to use other TTI members in these two functions
overrided in a target.
Minor refactoring: `getTypeLegalizationCost()` now doesn't need DataLayout
parameter - it was always passed from TTI.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117723
This is a potentially better alternative to D131452 that also
should avoid the infinite loop bug from:
issue #56403
This is again a minimal fix to reduce merging pain for the
release. But if this makes sense, then we might want to guard
all of the RTLIB generation (and other libcalls?) with a
similar name check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131521
Improve copy statistics:
- Count copies from or to physical registers: They are used to model function parameters and calling conventions and the register allocator optimizes for them.
- Check physical registers assigned to virtual registers and stop counting "identity" `COPY`s where source and destination is the same physical registers; they will be removed in the `virtregmap` pass anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131932
The current machine function splitter is reliant on profile data to do profile summary analysis to split blocks into cold section. This may sometimes limit the usage of machine function splitter especially in cases where we could do some form of static analysis to split out cold blocks if profile data is absent or profile data which may be faulty (Consider Sample PGO).
Of all code that could statically be marked cold Exception handling blocks are one of them (In fact BFI framework also tends to mark them as cold), and the most in size contribution. In my experiments I found out Exception handling pads and all code reachable from there account for up to 6-8% of the .text section on modern production binaries. This patch introduces a flag to split out all Exception handling blocks and blocks only reachable from Exceptional Handling pad to cold section. This flag has shown to give a performance win of up to 0.1% in terms of average cycles and instructions executed on internal facebook search service.
Reviewed By: snehasish
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131824
This reverts commit 8c4aea438c.
Needed because buildbot failures (warnings) gave a clue that there was
a functional bug in the ARM rejection logic.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132037
This interface allows a target to reject a proposed
SMS schedule. For Hexagon/PowerPC, all schedules
are accepted, leaving behavior unchanged. For ARM,
schedules which exceed register pressure limits are
rejected.
Also, two RegisterPressureTracker methods now need to be public so
that register pressure can be computed by more callers.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128941
There are two different senses in which a block can be "address-taken".
There can be a BlockAddress involved, which means we need to map the
IR-level value to some specific block of machine code. Or there can be
constructs inside a function which involve using the address of a basic
block to implement certain kinds of control flow.
Mixing these together causes a problem: if target-specific passes are
marking random blocks "address-taken", if we have a BlockAddress, we
can't actually tell which MachineBasicBlock corresponds to the
BlockAddress.
So split this into two separate bits: one for BlockAddress, and one for
the machine-specific bits.
Discovered while trying to sort out related stuff on D102817.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124697
This patch fixes an issue where an instruction reading a whole register would be moved during register allocation into a spot where one of the subregisters was dead.
The code to check whether an instruction can be rematerialized at a given point or not was already checking for subranges to ensure that subregisters are live, but only when the instruction being moved was using a subregister, this patch changes that so the subranges are checked even when the moved instruction uses the full register.
This patch also adds a case to the original test for the subrange checking that trigger the issue described above.
The original subrange checking code was introduced in this revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115278
And I've encountered this issue on AMDGPUs while working with DPC++: https://github.com/intel/llvm/issues/6209
Essentially the greedy register allocator attempts to move the following instruction:
```
%3961:vreg_64 = V_LSHLREV_B64_e64 3, %3078:vreg_64, implicit $exec
```
From `@3440` into the body of a loop `@16312`, but `%3078` has the following live ranges:
```
%3078 [2224r,2240r:0)[2240r,3488B:1)[16192B,38336B:1) 0@2224r 1@2240r L0000000000000003 [2224r,3440r:0) 0@2224r L000000000000000C [2240r,3488B:0)[16192B,38336B:0) 0@2240r
```
So `@16312e` `%3078.sub1` is alive but `%3078.sub0` is dead, so this instruction being moved there leads to invalid memory accesses as `3078.sub0` ends up being trashed and the result of this instruction is used as part of an address calculation for a load.
On the original ticket this issue showed up on gfx906 and gfx90a but not on gfx908, this turned out to be because on gfx908 instead of moving the shift instruction into the loop, its value is spilled into an ACC register, gfx906 doesn't have ACC registers and for gfx90a ACC registers are used like regular vector registers and so aren't used for spilling.
With this patch the original application from the DPC++ ticket works properly on gfx906, and the result of the shift instruction is correctly spilled instead of moving the instruction in the loop.
Original Author: npmiller
Reviewed by: rampitec
Submitted by: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131884
Currently we treat initializers with init_seg(compiler/lib) as similar
to any other init_seg, they simply have a global variable in the proper
section (".CRT$XCC" for compiler/".CRT$XCL" for lib) and are added to
llvm.used. However, this doesn't match with how LLVM sees normal (or
init_seg(user)) initializers via llvm.global_ctors. This
causes issues like incorrect init_seg(compiler) vs init_seg(user)
ordering due to GlobalOpt evaluating constructors, and the
ability to remove init_seg(compiler/lib) initializers at all.
Currently we use 'A' for priorities less than 200. Use 200 for
init_seg(compiler) (".CRT$XCC") and 400 for init_seg(lib) (".CRT$XCL"),
which do not append the priority to the section name. Priorities
between 200 and 400 use ".CRT$XCC${Priority}". This allows for
some wiggle room for people/future extensions that want to add
initializers between compiler and lib.
Fixes#56922
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131910
Static variables declared within a routine or lexical block should
be emitted with a non-qualified name. This allows the variables to
be visible to the Visual Studio watch window.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131400
When no landing pads exist for a function, `@LPStart` is undefined and must be omitted.
EH table is generally not emitted for functions without landing pads, except when the personality function is uknown (`!isNoOpWithoutInvoke(classifyEHPersonality(Per))`). In that case, we must omit `@LPStart` even when machine function splitting is enabled.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131626
Currently there is no way to add in development features to the ML
regalloc evict advisor which is useful to have when working on feature
engineering/improving the current model. This patch adds in the ability
to add in development features to the ML regalloc evict advisor which
are gated by a runtime flag and not added in at all if not compiled in
LLVM development mode. This sets the stage for future work where we are
planning on upstreaming some of the newer features that we are currently
experimenting with.
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131209
This is a followup to D131350, which caused another problem for i64
types being split into i32 on i32 targets. This patch tries to make sure
that either Illegal types are OK, or that the element types of a
buildvector are legal and bigger than or equal to the size of the
original elements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131883
This patch really just extends D39946 towards stores as well as loads.
While the patch is in SelectionDAGBuilder, it only applies to AVR (the
only target that supports unaligned atomic operations).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128483
The outer signext_inreg is redundant in the following:
Fold (signext_inreg (extract_subvector (zext|anyext|sext iN_value to _) _) from iN)
-> (extract_subvector (signext iN_value to iM))
Tests are precommitted and clone those by analogy from the AND case in
the same file. Add a negative test to check extension width is handled
correctly.
This patch supersedes D130700.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131503
These are guaranteed not to create undef/poison (although they may pass through) - the associated ISD::VALUETYPE node is also guaranteed never to generate poison
Reland commit 719658d078
The base RA support infrastructure that only allow a specific register
class be allocated in RA pss. Since greedy RA, basic RA derived from
base RA, they all allow allocating specific register class. Fast RA
doesn't support allocating register for specific register class. This
patch is to enable ShouldAllocateClass in fast RA, so that it can
support allocating register for specific register class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131825
SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits shouldn't be creating general nodes like this - although we allow bitcasts, even general constant folding is avoided.
Removing it causes a number of regressions that need addressing first, but I've added a TODO for now.
TLS debug on AIX is not ready for now.
The location generated in no-integrated-as mode is wrong and
in integrated-as mode causes AIX linker error.
Reviewed By: Esme
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130245
Expand TypePromotion pass to try to promote PHI-nodes in loops that are the
operand of a ZExt, using the ZExt's result type to determine the Promote Width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111237
Kazu Hirata