This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
The patch introduces the required changes to update the pass declarations and definitions to use the new autogenerated files and allow dropping the old infrastructure.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, rriddle
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132838
The patch introduces the required changes to update the pass declarations and definitions to use the new autogenerated files and allow dropping the old infrastructure.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, rriddle
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132838
This patch revamps the BranchOpInterface a bit and allows a proper implementation of what was previously `getMutableSuccessorOperands` for operations, which internally produce arguments to some of the block arguments. A motivating example for this would be an invoke op with a error handling path:
```
invoke %function(%0)
label ^success ^error(%1 : i32)
^error(%e: !error, %arg0 : i32):
...
```
The advantages of this are that any users of `BranchOpInterface` can still argue over remaining block argument operands (such as `%1` in the example above), as well as make use of the modifying capabilities to add more operands, erase an operand etc.
The way this patch implements that functionality is via a new class called `SuccessorOperands`, which is now returned by `getSuccessorOperands`. It basically contains an `unsigned` denoting how many operator produced operands exist, as well as a `MutableOperandRange`, which are the usual forwarded operands we are used to. The produced operands are assumed to the first few block arguments, followed by the forwarded operands afterwards. The role of `SuccessorOperands` is to provide various utility functions to modify and query the successor arguments from a `BranchOpInterface`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123062
The current dialect registry allows for attaching delayed interfaces, that are added to attrs/dialects/ops/etc.
when the owning dialect gets loaded. This is clunky for quite a few reasons, e.g. each interface type has a
separate tracking structure, and is also quite limiting. This commit refactors this delayed mutation of
dialect constructs into a more general DialectExtension mechanism. This mechanism is essentially a registration
callback that is invoked when a set of dialects have been loaded. This allows for attaching interfaces directly
on the loaded constructs, and also allows for loading new dependent dialects. The latter of which is
extremely useful as it will now enable dependent dialects to only apply in the contexts in which they
are necessary. For example, a dialect dependency can now be conditional on if a user actually needs the
interface that relies on it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120367
New buffer allocations can now be returned/yielded from blocks with `allow-return-allocs`. One-Shot Bufferize deallocates all buffers at the end of the block. If this is not possible (because the buffer escapes the block), this is now done by the existing BufferDeallocation pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121527
This would create a double free when a memref is passed twice to the
same op. This wasn't a problem at the time the pass was written but is
common since the introduction of scf.while.
There's a latent non-determinism that's triggered by the test, but this
change is messy enough as-is so I'll leave that for later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120044
Transforms/ should only contain dialect-independent transformations,
and these files are a much better fit for the bufferization dialect anyways.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117839
The only benefit of FunctionPass is that it filters out function
declarations. This isn't enough to justify carrying it around, as we can
simplify filter out declarations when necessary within the pass. We can
also explore with better scheduling primitives to filter out declarations
at the pipeline level in the future.
The definition of FunctionPass is left intact for now to allow time for downstream
users to migrate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117182
Kazu Hirata