Add void casts to mark the variables used, next to the places where
they are used in assert or `LLVM_DEBUG()` expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123117
The way function gets the induction variable is by judging whether
StepInst or IndVar in the phi statement is one of the operands of CMP.
But if the LatchCmpOp0/LatchCmpOp1 is a constant, the subsequent
comparison may result in null == null, which is meaningless. This patch
fixes the typo.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112980
Recommit of 707ce34b06. Don't introduce a
dependency to the LLVMPasses component, instead register the required
passes individually.
Add methods for loop unrolling to the OpenMPIRBuilder class and use them in Clang if `-fopenmp-enable-irbuilder` is enabled. The unrolling methods are:
* `unrollLoopFull`
* `unrollLoopPartial`
* `unrollLoopHeuristic`
`unrollLoopPartial` and `unrollLoopHeuristic` can use compiler heuristics to automatically determine the unroll factor. If possible, that is if no CanonicalLoopInfo is required to pass to another method, metadata for LLVM's LoopUnrollPass is added. Otherwise the unroll factor is determined using the same heurstics as user by LoopUnrollPass. Not requiring a CanonicalLoopInfo, especially with `unrollLoopHeuristic` allows greater flexibility.
With full unrolling and partial unrolling with known unroll factor, instead of duplicating instructions by the OpenMPIRBuilder, the full unroll is still delegated to the LoopUnrollPass. In case of partial unrolling the loop is first tiled using the existing `tileLoops` methods, then the inner loop fully unrolled using the same mechanism.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107764
Breaks build with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON
```
CMake Error: The inter-target dependency graph contains the following strongly connected component (cycle):
"LLVMFrontendOpenMP" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMPasses" (weak)
"LLVMipo" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMFrontendOpenMP" (weak)
"LLVMCoroutines" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMipo" (weak)
"LLVMPasses" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMCoroutines" (weak)
depends on "LLVMipo" (weak)
At least one of these targets is not a STATIC_LIBRARY. Cyclic dependencies are allowed only among static libraries.
CMake Generate step failed. Build files cannot be regenerated correctly.
```
This reverts commit 707ce34b06.
Add methods for loop unrolling to the OpenMPIRBuilder class and use them in Clang if `-fopenmp-enable-irbuilder` is enabled. The unrolling methods are:
* `unrollLoopFull`
* `unrollLoopPartial`
* `unrollLoopHeuristic`
`unrollLoopPartial` and `unrollLoopHeuristic` can use compiler heuristics to automatically determine the unroll factor. If possible, that is if no CanonicalLoopInfo is required to pass to another method, metadata for LLVM's LoopUnrollPass is added. Otherwise the unroll factor is determined using the same heurstics as user by LoopUnrollPass. Not requiring a CanonicalLoopInfo, especially with `unrollLoopHeuristic` allows greater flexibility.
With full unrolling and partial unrolling with known unroll factor, instead of duplicating instructions by the OpenMPIRBuilder, the full unroll is still delegated to the LoopUnrollPass. In case of partial unrolling the loop is first tiled using the existing `tileLoops` methods, then the inner loop fully unrolled using the same mechanism.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107764
Make getLatchCmpInst non-static and use it in LoopFlatten as a more
robust way of identifying the compare.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106256
Essentially, the cover function simply combines the loop level check and the function level scope into one call. This simplifies several callers and is (subjectively) less error prone.
induction variable to be perfect
This patch allow more conditional branches to be considered as loop
guard, and so more loop nests can be considered perfect.
Reviewed By: bmahjour, sidbav
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94717
Being lazy with printing the banner seems hard to reason with, we should print it
unconditionally first (it could also lead to duplicate banners if we
have multiple functions in -filter-print-funcs).
The printIR() functions were doing too many things. I separated out the
call from PrintPassInstrumentation since we were essentially doing two
completely separate things in printIR() from different callers.
There were multiple ways to generate the name of some IR. That's all
been moved to getIRName(). The printing of the IR name was also
inconsistent, now it's always "IR Dump on $foo" where "$foo" is the
name. For a function, it's the function name. For a loop, it's what's
printed by Loop::print(), which is more detailed. For an SCC, it's the
list of functions in parentheses. For a module it's "[module]", to
differentiate between a possible SCC with a function called "module".
To preserve D74814, we have to check if we're going to print anything at
all first. This is unfortunate, but I would consider this a special
case that shouldn't be handled in the core logic.
Reviewed By: jamieschmeiser
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100231
This changes --print-before/after to be a list of strings rather than
legacy passes. (this also has the effect of not showing the entire list
of passes in --help-hidden after --print-before/after, which IMO is
great for making it less verbose).
Currently PrintIRInstrumentation passes the class name rather than pass
name to llvm::shouldPrintBeforePass(), meaning
llvm::shouldPrintBeforePass() never functions as intended in the NPM.
There is no easy way of converting class names to pass names outside of
within an instance of PassBuilder.
This adds a map of pass class names to their short names in
PassRegistry.def within PassInstrumentationCallbacks. It is populated
inside the constructor of PassBuilder, which takes a
PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
Add a pointer to PassInstrumentationCallbacks inside
PrintIRInstrumentation and use the newly created map.
This is a bit hacky, but I can't think of a better way since the short
id to class name only exists within PassRegistry.def. This also doesn't
handle passes not in PassRegistry.def but rather added via
PassBuilder::registerPipelineParsingCallback().
llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/print-after.ll doesn't seem very useful now
with this change.
Reviewed By: ychen, jamieschmeiser
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87216
This patch adds the llvm.loop.mustprogress loop metadata. This is to be
added to loops where the frontend language requires that the loop makes
observable interactions with the environment. This is the loop-level
equivalent to the function attribute `mustprogress` defined in D86233.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88464
This is a long-delayed follow-up to
5e5b85098d.
`TempMDNode` includes a bunch of machinery for RAUW, and should only be
used when necessary. RAUW wasn't being used in any of these cases... it
was just a placeholder for a self-reference.
Where the real node was using `MDNode::getDistinct`, just replace the
temporary argument with `nullptr`.
Where the real node was using `MDNode::get`, the `replaceOperandWith`
call was "promoting" the node to a distinct one implicitly due to
self-reference detection in `MDNode::handleChangedOperand`. The
`TempMDNode` was serving a purpose by delaying uniquing, but it's way
simpler to just call `MDNode::getDistinct` in the first place.
Note that using a self-reference at all in these places is a hold-over
from before `distinct` metadata existed. It was an old trick to create
distinct nodes. It would be intrusive to change, including bitcode
upgrades, etc., and it's harmless so I'm not sure there's much value in
removing it from existing schemas. After this commit it still has a tiny
memory cost (in the extra metadata operand) but no more overhead in
construction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90079
This patch renames the LoopInfo::isRotated() method to LoopInfo::isRotatedForm()
to make it clear that the method checks whether the loop is in rotated form, not
whether the loop has been rotated by the LoopRotation pass.
Summary:
This patch adds a method to determine if a loop is in rotated form (the latch is
an exiting block). It also modifies the getLoopGuardBranch method to use this
new method. This method can also be used in Loopfusion. Once this patch lands I
will make the corresponding changes there.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, etiotto, Whitney, fhahn, hfinkel
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65958
Moving accesses in MemorySSA at InsertionPlace::End, when an instruction is
moved into a block, almost always means insert at the end of the block, but
before the block terminator. This matters when the block terminator is a
MemoryAccess itself (an invoke), and the insertion must be done before
the terminator for the update to be correct.
Insert an additional position: InsertionPlace:BeforeTerminator and update
current usages where this applies.
Resolves PR44027.
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
Summary: The assertion in getLoopGuardBranch can be a 'return nullptr'
under if condition.
Authored By: DTharun
Reviewer: Whitney, fhahn
Reviewed By: Whitney, fhahn
Subscribers: fhahn, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66084
llvm-svn: 373857
exits"
Get a better approach in https://reviews.llvm.org/D68107 to solve the problem.
Revert the initial patch and will commit the new one soon.
This reverts commit rL372990.
llvm-svn: 373044
Summary: As discussed in the loop group meeting. With the current
definition of loop guard, we should not allow multiple loop exiting
blocks. For loops that has multiple loop exiting blocks, we can simply
unable to find the loop guard.
When getUniqueExitBlock() obtains a vector size not equals to one, that
means there is either no exit blocks or there exists more than one
unique block the loop exit to.
If we don't disallow loop with multiple loop exit blocks, then with our
current implementation, there can exist exit blocks don't post dominated
by the non pre-header successor of the guard block.
Reviewer: reames, Meinersbur, kbarton, etiotto, bmahjour
Reviewed By: Meinersbur, kbarton
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66529
llvm-svn: 373011
for extreme large case.
We had a case that a single loop which has 4000 exits and the average number
of predecessors of each exit is > 1000, and we found compiling the case spent
a significant amount of time on checking whether a loop has dedicated exits.
This patch adds a limit for the iterations to the check. With the patch, the
time to compile our testcase reduced from 1000s to 200s (clang release build).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67359
llvm-svn: 372990
Summary:
This is the first patch for the loop guard. We introduced
getLoopGuardBranch() and isGuarded().
This currently only works on simplified loop, as it requires a preheader
and a latch to identify the guard.
It will work on loops of the form:
/// GuardBB:
/// br cond1, Preheader, ExitSucc <== GuardBranch
/// Preheader:
/// br Header
/// Header:
/// ...
/// br Latch
/// Latch:
/// br cond2, Header, ExitBlock
/// ExitBlock:
/// br ExitSucc
/// ExitSucc:
Prior discussions leading upto the decision to introduce the loop guard
API: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-May/132607.html
Reviewer: reames, kbarton, hfinkel, jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: wuzish, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits, bmahjour, etiotto
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63885
llvm-svn: 367033
Summary:
LoopInfoWrapperPass::verify uses DT, which means DT must be alive
even if it has no direct users.
Fixes a crash in expensive checks mode.
Reviewers: pcc, leonardchan
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64896
llvm-svn: 366388
Summary:
There is currently a correctness issue when unrolling loops containing
callbr's where their indirect targets are being updated correctly to the
newly created labels, but their operands are not. This manifests in
unrolled loops where the second and subsequent copies of callbr
instructions have blockaddresses of the label from the first instance of
the unrolled loop, which would result in nonsensical runtime control
flow.
For now, conservatively do not unroll the loop. In the future, I think
we can pursue unrolling such loops provided we transform the cloned
callbr's operands correctly.
Such a transform and its legalities are being discussed in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64101
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42489
Link: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/clang-built-linux/z-hRWP9KqPI
Reviewers: fhahn, hfinkel, efriedma
Reviewed By: fhahn, hfinkel, efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, zzheng, dmgreen, llvm-commits, pirama, kees, nathanchance, E5ten, craig.topper, chandlerc, glider, void, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64368
llvm-svn: 366130
Summary:
This PR extends the loop object with more utilities to get loop bounds, step, induction variable, and guard branch. There already exists passes which try to obtain the loop induction variable in their own pass, e.g. loop interchange. It would be useful to have a common area to get these information. Moreover, loop fusion (https://reviews.llvm.org/D55851) is planning to use getGuard() to extend the kind of loops it is able to fuse, e.g. rotated loop with non-constant upper bound, which would have a loop guard.
/// Example:
/// for (int i = lb; i < ub; i+=step)
/// <loop body>
/// --- pseudo LLVMIR ---
/// beforeloop:
/// guardcmp = (lb < ub)
/// if (guardcmp) goto preheader; else goto afterloop
/// preheader:
/// loop:
/// i1 = phi[{lb, preheader}, {i2, latch}]
/// <loop body>
/// i2 = i1 + step
/// latch:
/// cmp = (i2 < ub)
/// if (cmp) goto loop
/// exit:
/// afterloop:
///
/// getBounds
/// getInitialIVValue --> lb
/// getStepInst --> i2 = i1 + step
/// getStepValue --> step
/// getFinalIVValue --> ub
/// getCanonicalPredicate --> '<'
/// getDirection --> Increasing
/// getGuard --> if (guardcmp) goto loop; else goto afterloop
/// getInductionVariable --> i1
/// getAuxiliaryInductionVariable --> {i1}
/// isCanonical --> false
Committed on behalf of @Whitney (Whitney Tsang).
Reviewers: kbarton, hfinkel, dmgreen, Meinersbur, jdoerfert, syzaara, fhahn
Reviewed By: kbarton
Subscribers: tvvikram, bmahjour, etiotto, fhahn, jsji, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60565
llvm-svn: 361517
Summary:
Preserve MemorySSA in LoopSimplify, in the old pass manager, if the analysis is available.
Do not preserve it in the new pass manager.
Update tests.
Subscribers: nemanjai, jlebar, javed.absar, Prazek, kbarton, zzheng, jsji, llvm-commits, george.burgess.iv, chandlerc
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60833
llvm-svn: 360270
Summary:
This change was part of D46460. However, in the meantime rL341926 fixed the
correctness issue here. What remained was the performance issue in setLoopID
where it would iterate through all blocks in the loop and their successors,
rather than just the predecessor of the header (the later presumably being
much faster). We already have the `getLoopLatches` to compute precisely these
basic blocks in an efficient manner, so just use it (as the original commit
did for `getLoopID`).
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61215
llvm-svn: 359684
Loop::setAlreadyUnrolled() and
LoopVectorizeHints::setLoopAlreadyUnrolled() both add loop metadata that
stops the same loop from being transformed multiple times. This patch
merges both implementations.
In doing so we fix 3 potential issues:
* setLoopAlreadyUnrolled() kept the llvm.loop.vectorize/interleave.*
metadata even though it will not be used anymore. This already caused
problems such as http://llvm.org/PR40546. Change the behavior to the
one of setAlreadyUnrolled which deletes this loop metadata.
* setAlreadyUnrolled() used to create a new LoopID by calling
MDNode::get with nullptr as the first operand, then replacing it by
the returned references using replaceOperandWith. It is possible
that MDNode::get would instead return an existing node (due to
de-duplication) that then gets modified. To avoid, use a fresh
TempMDNode that does not get uniqued with anything else before
replacing it with replaceOperandWith.
* LoopVectorizeHints::matchesHintMetadataName() only compares the
suffix of the attribute to set the new value for. That is, when
called with "enable", would erase attributes such as
"llvm.loop.unroll.enable", "llvm.loop.vectorize.enable" and
"llvm.loop.distribute.enable" instead of the one to replace.
Fortunately, function was only called with "isvectorized".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57566
llvm-svn: 353738
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The current llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata has a problem in that
it uses LoopIDs. LoopID unfortunately is not loop identifier. It is
neither unique (there's even a regression test assigning the some LoopID
to multiple loops; can otherwise happen if passes such as LoopVersioning
make copies of entire loops) nor persistent (every time a property is
removed/added from a LoopID's MDNode, it will also receive a new LoopID;
this happens e.g. when calling Loop::setLoopAlreadyUnrolled()).
Since most loop transformation passes change the loop attributes (even
if it just to mark that a loop should not be processed again as
llvm.loop.isvectorized does, for the versioned and unversioned loop),
the parallel access information is lost for any subsequent pass.
This patch unlinks LoopIDs and parallel accesses.
llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata on instruction is replaced by
llvm.access.group metadata. llvm.access.group points to a distinct
MDNode with no operands (avoiding the problem to ever need to add/remove
operands), called "access group". Alternatively, it can point to a list
of access groups. The LoopID then has an attribute
llvm.loop.parallel_accesses with all the access groups that are parallel
(no dependencies carries by this loop).
This intentionally avoid any kind of "ID". Loops that are clones/have
their attributes modifies retain the llvm.loop.parallel_accesses
attribute. Access instructions that a cloned point to the same access
group. It is not necessary for each access to have it's own "ID" MDNode,
but those memory access instructions with the same behavior can be
grouped together.
The behavior of llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access is not changed by this
patch, but should be considered deprecated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52116
llvm-svn: 349725
When multiple loop transformation are defined in a loop's metadata, their order of execution is defined by the order of their respective passes in the pass pipeline. For instance, e.g.
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)
#pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
is the same as
#pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)
and will try to loop-distribute before Unroll-And-Jam because the LoopDistribute pass is scheduled after UnrollAndJam pass. UnrollAndJamPass only supports one inner loop, i.e. it will necessarily fail after loop distribution. It is not possible to specify another execution order. Also,t the order of passes in the pipeline is subject to change between versions of LLVM, optimization options and which pass manager is used.
This patch adds 'followup' attributes to various loop transformation passes. These attributes define which attributes the resulting loop of a transformation should have. For instance,
!0 = !{!0, !1, !2}
!1 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.enable"}
!2 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.followup_inner", !3}
!3 = !{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable"}
defines a loop ID (!0) to be unrolled-and-jammed (!1) and then the attribute !3 to be added to the jammed inner loop, which contains the instruction to distribute the inner loop.
Currently, in both pass managers, pass execution is in a fixed order and UnrollAndJamPass will not execute again after LoopDistribute. We hope to fix this in the future by allowing pass managers to run passes until a fixpoint is reached, use Polly to perform these transformations, or add a loop transformation pass which takes the order issue into account.
For mandatory/forced transformations (e.g. by having been declared by #pragma omp simd), the user must be notified when a transformation could not be performed. It is not possible that the responsible pass emits such a warning because the transformation might be 'hidden' in a followup attribute when it is executed, or it is not present in the pipeline at all. For this reason, this patche introduces a WarnMissedTransformations pass, to warn about orphaned transformations.
Since this changes the user-visible diagnostic message when a transformation is applied, two test cases in the clang repository need to be updated.
To ensure that no other transformation is executed before the intended one, the attribute `llvm.loop.disable_nonforced` can be added which should disable transformation heuristics before the intended transformation is applied. E.g. it would be surprising if a loop is distributed before a #pragma unroll_and_jam is applied.
With more supported code transformations (loop fusion, interchange, stripmining, offloading, etc.), transformations can be used as building blocks for more complex transformations (e.g. stripmining+stripmining+interchange -> tiling).
Reviewed By: hfinkel, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49281
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55288
llvm-svn: 348944
Martin Storsjö