To better reflect the meaning of the now-disambiguated {GlobalValue,
GlobalAlias}::getBaseObject after breaking off GlobalIFunc::getResolverFunction
(D109792), the function is renamed to getAliaseeObject.
This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Recommitting with fix to MemoryDepChecker::isDependent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
We can't use Use.Calls after its std::move()'d to TmpCalls as it will be in an undefined state. Instead, swap with the known empty map in TmpCalls so we can then safely emplace_back into the now empty Use.Calls.
Fixes clang static analyzer warning.
This avoid GUID lookup in Index.findSummaryInModule.
Follow up for D81242.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85269
addGlobalValueSummary can check newly added FunctionSummary
and set HasParamAccess to mark that generateParamAccessSummary
is needed.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85182
We can't consider variable safe if out-of-lifetime access is possible.
So if StackLifetime can't prove that the instruction always uses
the variable when it's still alive, we consider it unsafe.
Usually DominatorTree provides this info, but here we use
StackLifetime. The reason is that in the next patch StackLifetime
will be used for actual lifetime checks and we can avoid
forwarding the DominatorTree into this code.
GCC5 errors out with:
llvm/lib/Analysis/StackSafetyAnalysis.cpp:935:21: error: use of 'KV' before deduction of 'auto'
for (auto &KV : KV.second.Params) {
^
Summary:
ThinLTO linking runs dataflow processing on collected
function parameters. Then StackSafetyGlobalInfoWrapperPass
in ThinLTO backend will run as usual looking up to external
symbol in the summary if needed.
Depends on D80985.
Reviewers: eugenis, pcc
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: inglorion, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81242
We don't need process paramenters which marked as
byval as we are not going to pass interested allocas
without copying.
If we pass value into byval argument, we just handle that
as Load of corresponding type and stop that branch of analysis.
Summary:
The patch wraps ThinLTO index into immutable
pass which can be used by StackSafety analysis.
Reviewers: eugenis, pcc
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80985
Kazu Hirata