This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.
This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.
In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.
We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.
In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.
Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.
at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
DR2338 clarified that it was undefined behavior to set the value outside the
range of the enumerations values for an enum without a fixed underlying type.
We should diagnose this with a constant expression context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130058
DR2338 clarified that it was undefined behavior to set the value outside the
range of the enumerations values for an enum without a fixed underlying type.
We should diagnose this with a constant expression context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130058
specialization
Previously in D120397, we've handled the linkage for function template
and its specialization. But we forgot to handle it for class templates
and their specialization. So we make it in the patch with the similar
approach.
In cases where a non-template function is defined inside a function
template, we don't have information about the original uninstantiated
version. In the case of concepts instantiation, we will need the
ability to get back to the original template. This patch splits a piece
of the deferred concepts instantaition patch off to accomplish the
storage of this, with minor runtime overhead, and zero additional
storage.
This reverts commit d4d47e574e.
This fixes the lldb crash that was observed by ensuring that our
friend-'template contains reference to' TreeTransform properly handles a
TemplateDecl.
This reverts commit 2f20743952 because it
triggers an assertion when building an LLDB test program:
Assertion failed: (InstantiatingSpecializations.empty() && "failed to
clean up an InstantiatingTemplate?"), function ~Sema, file
/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp,
line 458.
More details in https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907.
This patch implements a necessary part of P0848, the overload resolution for destructors.
It is now possible to overload destructors based on constraints, and the eligible destructor
will be selected at the end of the class.
The approach this patch takes is to perform the overload resolution in Sema::ActOnFields
and to mark the selected destructor using a new property in FunctionDeclBitfields.
CXXRecordDecl::getDestructor is then modified to use this property to return the correct
destructor.
This closes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45614.
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126194
We should not mark a function as "referenced" if we call it within a
ConstantExpr, because the expression will be folded to a value in LLVM
IR. To prevent emitting consteval function declarations, we should not "jump
over" a ConstantExpr when it is a top-level ParmVarDecl's subexpression.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/48230
Reviewed By: erichkeane, aaron.ballman, ChuanqiXu
Differenitial Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119646
This should be a NFC cleanup. It removes a unnecessary loop to get the underlying
decl, and add an assertion.
The underlying decl of a using-shadow decl is always the original declaration
has been brought into the scope, clang never builds a nested using-shadow
decl (see Sema::BuildUsingShadowDecl).
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123422
This includes a fix for the libc++ issue I ran across with friend
declarations not properly being identified as overloads.
This reverts commit 45c07db31c.
This reverts commit a97899108e.
The patch caused some problems with the libc++ `__range_adaptor_closure`
that I haven't been able to figure out the cause of, so I am reverting
while I figure out whether this is a solvable problem/issue with the
CFE, or libc++ depending on an older 'incorrect' behavior.
This reverts commit 0c31da4838.
I've solved the issue with the PointerUnion by making the
`FunctionTemplateDecl` pointer be a NamedDecl, that could be a
`FunctionDecl` or `FunctionTemplateDecl` depending. This is enforced
with an assert.
This reverts commit 4b6c2cd647.
The patch caused numerous ARM 32 bit build failures, since we added a
5th item to the PointerUnion, and went over the 2-bits available in the
32 bit pointers.
As reported here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/44178
Concepts are not supposed to be instantiated until they are checked, so
this patch implements that and goes through significant amounts of work
to make sure we properly re-instantiate the concepts correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544
A record may have more than just FieldDecls in it. If so, then we're
likely to drop them if we only randomize the FieldDecls.
We need to be careful about anonymous structs/unions. Their fields are
made available in the RecordDecl as IndirectFieldDecls, which are listed
after the anonymous struct/union. The ordering doesn't appear to be
super important, however we place them unrandomized at the end of the
RecordDecl just in case. There's also the possiblity of
StaticAssertDecls. We also want those at the end.
All other non-FieldDecls we place at the top, just in case we get
something like:
struct foo {
enum e { BORK };
enum e a;
};
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/185
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123958
In D123649, I got the formula for getFlexibleArrayInitChars slightly
wrong: the flexible array elements can be contained in the tail padding
of the struct. Fix the formula to account for that.
With the fixed formula, we run into another issue: in some cases, we
were emitting extra padding for flexible arrray initializers. Fix
CGExprConstant so it uses a packed struct when necessary, to avoid this
extra padding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123826
Flexible array initialization is a C/C++ extension implemented in many
compilers to allow initializing the flexible array tail of a struct type
that contains a flexible array. In clang, this is currently restricted
to C. But this construct is used in the Microsoft SDK headers, so I'd
like to extend it to C++.
For now, this doesn't handle dynamic initialization; probably not hard
to implement, but it's extra code, and I don't think it's necessary for
the expected uses. And we explicitly fail out of constant evaluation.
I've added some additional code to assert that initializers have the
correct size, with or without flexible array init. This might catch
issues unrelated to flexible array init.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649
The Randstruct feature is a compile-time hardening technique that
randomizes the field layout for designated structures of a code base.
Admittedly, this is mostly useful for closed-source releases of code,
since the randomization seed would need to be available for public and
open source applications.
Why implement it? This patch set enhances Clang’s feature parity with
that of GCC which already has the Randstruct feature. It's used by the
Linux kernel in certain structures to help thwart attacks that depend on
structure layouts in memory.
This patch set is a from-scratch reimplementation of the Randstruct
feature that was originally ported to GCC. The patches for the GCC
implementation can be found here:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/04/06/14
Link: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-March/061607.html
Co-authored-by: Cole Nixon <nixontcole@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Connor Kuehl <cipkuehl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Foster <jafosterja@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff Takahashi <jeffrey.takahashi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Cantrell <jordan.cantrell@mail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikk Forbus <nicholas.forbus@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Pugh <nwtpugh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556
This reverts commit 3f0587d0c6.
Not all tests pass after a few rounds of fixes.
I spot one failure that std::shuffle (potentially different results with
different STL implementations) was misused and replaced it with llvm::shuffle,
but there appears to be another failure in a Windows build.
The latest failure is reported on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556#3440383
The Randstruct feature is a compile-time hardening technique that
randomizes the field layout for designated structures of a code base.
Admittedly, this is mostly useful for closed-source releases of code,
since the randomization seed would need to be available for public and
open source applications.
Why implement it? This patch set enhances Clang’s feature parity with
that of GCC which already has the Randstruct feature. It's used by the
Linux kernel in certain structures to help thwart attacks that depend on
structure layouts in memory.
This patch set is a from-scratch reimplementation of the Randstruct
feature that was originally ported to GCC. The patches for the GCC
implementation can be found here:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/04/06/14
Link: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-March/061607.html
Co-authored-by: Cole Nixon <nixontcole@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Connor Kuehl <cipkuehl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Foster <jafosterja@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff Takahashi <jeffrey.takahashi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Cantrell <jordan.cantrell@mail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikk Forbus <nicholas.forbus@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Pugh <nwtpugh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556
At present, we are generating wrong code for C++20 modules entities which
should have internal linkage. This is because we are assigning
'ModuleInternalLinkage' unconditionally to such entities. However this mode
is only applicable to the modules-ts.
This change makes the special linkage mode conditional on fmodules-ts and
adds a unit test to verify that we generate the correct linkage.
Currently, static variables and functions in module purview are emitted into
object files as external. On some platforms, lambdas are emitted as global
weak defintions (on Windows this causes a mangler crash).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122413
Implement a demangleable strong ownership symbol mangling.
* The original module symbol mangling scheme turned out to be
undemangleable.
* The hoped-for C++17 compatibility of weak ownership turns out to be
fragile
* C++20 now has better ways of controlling C++17 compatibility
The issue is captured on the ABI list at:
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/134
GCC implements this new mangling.
The old mangling is unceremoniously dropped. No backwards
compatibility, no deprectated old-mangling flag. It was always
labelled experimental. (Old and new manglings cannot be confused.)
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122256
This is the first in a series of patches that introduce C++20 importable
header units.
These differ from clang header modules in that:
(a) they are identifiable by an internal name
(b) they represent the top level source for a single header - although
that might include or import other headers.
We name importable header units with the path by which they are specified
(although that need not be the absolute path for the file).
So "foo/bar.h" would have a name "foo/bar.h". Header units are made a
separate module type so that we can deal with diagnosing places where they
are permitted but a named module is not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121095
specialization
Before the patch, the compiler would crash for the test due to
inconsistent linkage.
This patch tries to avoid it by make the linkage consistent for template
and its specialization. After the patch, the behavior of compiler would
be partially correct for the case.
The correct one is:
```
export template<class T>
void f() {}
template<>
void f<int>() {}
```
In this case, the linkage for both declaration should be external (the
wording I get by consulting in WG21 is "the linkage for name f should be
external").
And for the case:
```
template<class T>
void f() {}
export template<>
void f<int>() {}
```
Compiler should reject it. This isn't done now. After all, this patch would
stop a crash.
Reviewed By: iains, aaron.ballman, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120397
The existing module symbol mangling scheme turns out to be
undemangleable. It is also desirable to switch to the
strong-ownership model as the hoped-for C++17 compatibility turns out
to be fragile, and we also now have a better way of controlling that.
The issue is captured on the ABI list at:
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/134
A document describing the issues and new mangling is at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qQjqptzOFT_lfXH8L6-iD9nCRi34wjft/view
This patch is the code-generation part. I have a demangler too, but
that patch is based on some to-be-landed refactoring of the demangler.
The old mangling is unceremoniously dropped. No backwards
compatibility, no deprectated old-mangling flag. It was always
labelled experimental. (Old and new manglings cannot be confused.)
Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118352
This is an initial enabling patch for module partition support.
We add enumerations for partition interfaces/implementations.
This means that the module kind enumeration now occupies three
bits, so the AST streamer is adjusted for this. Adding one bit there
seems preferable to trying to overload the meanings of existing
kinds (and we will also want to add a C++20 header unit case later).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114714
For redeclaration chains we maintain an invariant of having only a
single definition in the chain. In a single translation unit we make
sure not to create duplicates. But modules are separate translation
units and they can contain definitions for the same symbol
independently. When we load such modules together, we need to demote
duplicate definitions to keep the AST invariants.
Some AST clients are interested in distinguishing
declaration-that-was-demoted-from-definition and
declaration-that-was-never-a-definition. For that purpose introducing
`IsThisDeclarationADemotedDefinition`. No functional change intended.
rdar://84677782
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118855
NamespaceDecls are NamedDecls, so NSD can never be non-null in the
else branch. Add a comment about this whole ModuleInternal linkage
concept going away when p1815 is implemented.
Reviewed By: bruno
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118704
This patch changes the special-case handling of visibility when
compiling for an OpenMP target offloading device. This was orignally
added as a precaution against the bug encountered in PR41826 when
symbols in the device were being preempted by shared library symbols.
This should instead be done by making the visibility protected by default.
With protected visibility we are asserting that the symbols on the device
will never be preempted or preempt another symbol pending a shared library
load.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117806
This patch changes the visiblity of variables declared within a declare
target directive. Variable declarations within a declare target
directive need to be externally visible to the plugin for initialization
or reading. Previously this would cause runtime errors where the named
global could not be found because it was not included in the symbol
table.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117362
This patch changes the visiblity of variables declared within a declare
target directive. Variable declarations within a declare target
directive need to be externally visible to the plugin for initialization
or reading. Previously this would cause runtime errors where the named
global could not be found because it was not included in the symbol
table.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117362
This avoids an unnecessary copy required by 'return OS.str()', allowing
instead for NRVO or implicit move. The .str() call (which flushes the
stream) is no longer required since 65b13610a5,
which made raw_string_ostream unbuffered by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115374
According to [basic.namespace.general]/p2, a namespace declaration
shouldn't have a module linkage.
> A namespace is never attached to a named module and never has a name
> with module linkage.
Without this patch, the compiler would crash for the test in assertion
enabled build due to inconsistent linkage for redeclaration for
namespaces.
Reviewed by: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115132
See discussion in D51650, this change was a little aggressive in an
error while doing a 'while we were here', so this removes that error
condition, as it is apparently useful.
This reverts commit bb4934601d.
As discussed here: https://lwn.net/Articles/691932/
GCC6.0 adds target_clones multiversioning. This functionality is
an odd cross between the cpu_dispatch and 'target' MV, but is compatible
with neither.
This attribute allows you to list all options, then emits a separately
optimized version of each function per-option (similar to the
cpu_specific attribute). It automatically generates a resolver, just
like the other two.
The mangling however, is... ODD to say the least. The mangling format
is:
<normal_mangling>.<option string>.<option ordinal>.
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D51650
Corentin Jabot