Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kazu Hirata b6a01caa64 [llvm/unittests] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-02 22:10:37 -08:00
Sander de Smalen 41b6057641 [InstructionCost] Add saturation support.
This patch makes the operations on InstructionCost saturate, so that when
costs are accumulated they saturate to <max value>.

One of the compelling reasons for wanting to have saturation support
is because in various places, arbitrary values are used to represent
a 'high' cost, but when accumulating the cost of some set of operations
or a loop, overflow is not taken into account, which may lead to unexpected
results. By defining the operations to saturate, we can express the cost
of something 'very expensive' as InstructionCost::getMax().

Reviewed By: kparzysz, dmgreen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105108
2021-07-10 11:28:42 +01:00
Christopher Tetreault b8b054aa8a Reland "Ensure that InstructionCost actually implements a total ordering"
The operator< in the previous attempt was incorrect. It is unfortunate
that this was only caught by the expensive checks.

This reverts commit ff1147c363.
2021-02-04 10:04:10 -08:00
Christopher Tetreault ff1147c363 Revert "Ensure that InstructionCost actually implements a total ordering"
This reverts commit b481cd519e.
2021-02-02 12:10:02 -08:00
Christopher Tetreault b481cd519e Ensure that InstructionCost actually implements a total ordering
Previously, operator== would consider the actual equality of the pairs
(lhs.Value, lhs.State) == (rhs.Value, rhs.State). However, if an invalid
cost was involved in a call to operator<, only the state would be
compared. Thus, it was not the case that ({2, Invalid} < {3, Invalid} ||
{2, Invalid} > {3, Invalid} || {2, Invalid} == {3, Invalid}).

This patch implements a true total ordering, where cost state is
considered first, then value. While it's not really imporant that
{2, Invalid} be considered to be less than {3, Invalid}, it's not a
problem either. This patch also implements operator== in terms of
operator<, so the two definitions will be kept in sync.

Reviewed By: sdesmalen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95803
2021-02-02 11:49:14 -08:00
David Sherwood b7ccaca537 [NFC] Remove min/max functions from InstructionCost
Removed the InstructionCost::min/max functions because it's
fine to use std::min/max instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94301
2021-01-11 09:00:12 +00:00
David Sherwood 9b76160e53 [Support] Introduce a new InstructionCost class
This is the first in a series of patches that attempts to migrate
existing cost instructions to return a new InstructionCost class
in place of a simple integer. This new class is intended to be
as light-weight and simple as possible, with a full range of
arithmetic and comparison operators that largely mirror the same
sets of operations on basic types, such as integers. The main
advantage to using an InstructionCost is that it can encode a
particular cost state in addition to a value. The initial
implementation only has two states - Normal and Invalid - but these
could be expanded over time if necessary. An invalid state can
be used to represent an unknown cost or an instruction that is
prohibitively expensive.

This patch adds the new class and changes the getInstructionCost
interface to return the new class. Other cost functions, such as
getUserCost, etc., will be migrated in future patches as I believe
this to be less disruptive. One benefit of this new class is that
it provides a way to unify many of the magic costs in the codebase
where the cost is set to a deliberately high number to prevent
optimisations taking place, e.g. vectorization. It also provides
a route to represent the extremely high, and unknown, cost of
scalarization of scalable vectors, which is not currently supported.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91174
2020-12-11 08:12:54 +00:00