No code changes, but only increased the range in the tests.
Completes:
- LWG3273. Specify weekday_indexed to range of [0, 7]
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137015
Partially implements:
- P1361 Integration of chrono with text formatting
- P2372 Fixing locale handling in chrono formatters
- LWG3270 Parsing and formatting %j with durations
Completes:
- P1650R0 std::chrono::days with 'd' suffix
- LWG3262 Formatting of negative durations is not specified
- LWG3314 Is stream insertion behavior locale dependent when Period::type is micro?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134742
Update the formatter day tests to the new style.
Other test will be done separately.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134031
Instead of mentioning tm directly in the definition of __convert_to_tm,
take it as a template argument. As a fly-by also fix incorrect Lit feature
(should have been no-localization instead of libcpp-has-no-localization).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133490
Since the calendar is added in C++20 the existing operators are removed.
Implements part of:
- P1614R2 The Mothership has Landed
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129887
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
llvm-project\libcxx\test\std\time\time.hms\time.hms.members\seconds.pass.cpp(38): note: see reference to function template instantiation 'long check_seconds<std::chrono::seconds>(Duration)' being compiled
with
[
Duration=std::chrono::seconds
]
llvm-project\libcxx\test\std\time\time.hms\time.hms.members\seconds.pass.cpp(31): warning C4244: 'return': conversion from '_Rep' to 'long', possible loss of data
with
[
_Rep=__int64
]
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129928
Since the calendar classes were introduced in C++20 there's no need to
keep the old comparison operators.
This commit does the day calender class, the other calendar classes will
be in a followup commit.
Implements parts of:
- P1614R2 The mothership has landed
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128603
Display 'static_assert failed: message' instead of
'static_assert failed "message"' to be consistent
with other implementations and be slightly more
readable.
Reviewed By: #libc, aaron.ballman, philnik, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128844
Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
In the C++20 Standard time is no longer section under utilities, but
became its own chapter. This moves the time tests accordingly so their
location matches the current Standard.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122745
Mark de Wever