This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
This should make CI consistent on all the compilers we support. Most of
this patch is working around various warnings emitted by GCC in our code
base, which are now being shown when we compile the tests.
After this patch, the whole test suite should be warning free on all
compilers we support and test, except for a few warnings on GCC that
we silence explicitly until we figure out the proper fix for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120684
The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116809
Some headers which require the version header depend on other headers to
provide it. Include the version header in all top-level headers to make
sure a header cleanup can't remove the version header.
Note this doesn't add the version header to the c headers.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116172
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
In other places in the code, we use lowercase spelling for things that
are not available in prior standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109435
This affects only vectors with weird/malicious allocators,
the same corner case covered in D91708, but for `vector<bool>` this time.
Also ADL-proof <__tree>, which affects only sets and maps with weird/malicious
allocators where the ADL trap is in the *fancy pointer type*.
Also drive-by _VSTD:: qualification in the guts of std::bind,
std::packaged_task, std::condition_variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93424
I used a lot of `git grep` to find places where `std::` was being used
outside of comments and assert-messages. There were three outcomes:
- Qualified function calls, e.g. `std::move` becomes `_VSTD::move`.
This is the most common case.
- Typenames that don't need qualification, e.g. `std::allocator` becomes `allocator`.
Leaving these as `_VSTD::allocator` would also be fine, but I decided
that removing the qualification is more consistent with existing practice.
- Names that specifically need un-versioned `std::` qualification,
or that I wasn't sure about. For example, I didn't touch any code in
<atomic>, <math.h>, <new>, or any ext/ or experimental/ headers;
and I didn't touch any instances of `std::type_info`.
In some deduction guides, we were accidentally using `class Alloc = typename std::allocator<T>`,
despite `std::allocator<T>`'s type-ness not being template-dependent.
Because `std::allocator` is a qualified name, this did parse as we intended;
but what we meant was simply `class Alloc = allocator<T>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92250
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
This patch aims to help clang with better information so it can inline
__bit_reference count function usage for both std::biset. Current clang
inliner can not infer that the passed typed will be used only to select
the optimized variant, it evaluates the type argument and type check as
a load plus compare (although later optimization phases correctly
optimized this out).
It is mainly to help llvm inliner to generate better code for std::bitset
count for aarch64. It helps on both runtime and code size, since if inline
decides that _VSTD::count should not be inlined the vectorization will
create both aligned and unaligned variants (which add both code size and
runtime costs)
llvm-svn: 350936
Summary:
This patch improves how libc++ handles min/max macros within the headers. Previously libc++ would undef them and emit a warning.
This patch changes libc++ to use `#pragma push_macro` to save the macro before undefining it, and `#pragma pop_macro` to restore the macros and the end of the header.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, compnerd, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33080
llvm-svn: 304357
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
When <bitset> is compiled with warnings enabled, on a platform where
size_t is 4 bytes, it results in errors similar to:
bitset:265:16: error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed
from type 'unsigned long long' to '__storage_type' (aka 'unsigned
int') in initializer list [-Wc++11-narrowing]
: __first_{__v, __v >> __bits_per_word}
^~~
bitset:676:52: note: in instantiation of member function
'std::__1::__bitset<2, 53>::__bitset' requested here
bitset(unsigned long long __v) _NOEXCEPT : base(__v) {}
^
Fix these by casting the initializer list elements to __storage_type.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23960
llvm-svn: 280543
These are the cases when an out-of-class definition of a method is
marked _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, but the in-class declaration is
not. This will start failing when (or if) we switch to
attribute((internal_linkage)).
llvm-svn: 255166
This change moves visibility attributes from out-of-class method
definitions to in-class declaration. This is needed for a switch to
attribute((internal_linkage)) (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D13925)
which can only appear on the first declaration.
This change does not touch istream/ostream/streambuf. They are
handled separately in http://reviews.llvm.org/D14409.
llvm-svn: 252385
libc++ currently relies on undefined initialization order of global
initializers when using gcc:
1. __start_std_streams in iostream.cpp calls locale:🆔:_init, which assigns
an id to each locale::facet in an initializer
2. Every facet has a static locale::id id, whose constructor sets the facet's
id to 0
If 2 runs after 1, it clobbers the facet's assigned consecutive id, causing
exceptions to be thrown when e.g. running code like "cout << endl".
To fix this, let _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR evaluate to "constexpr" instead of nothing
with gcc. locale::id's constructor is marked _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR, which ensures
that it won't get an initializer that could potentially run after the
iostream.cpp initializer. (This remains broken when building with msvc.)
Also switch constexpr-specific code in bitset to use __SIZEOF_SIZE_T__ instead
of __SIZE_WIDTH__, because gcc doesn't define the latter.
Pair-programmed/debugged with Dana Jansens.
llvm-svn: 210188
Nikolas Klauser