There's a nuanced check about when to use suffixes on these integer
non-type-template-parameters, but when rebuilding names for
-gsimple-template-names there isn't enough data in the DWARF to
determine when to use suffixes or not. So turn on suffixes always to
make it easy to match up names in llvm-dwarfdump --verify.
I /think/ if we correctly modelled auto non-type-template parameters
maybe we could put suffixes only on those. But there's also some logic
in Clang that puts the suffixes on overloaded functions - at least
that's what the parameter says (see D77598 and printTemplateArguments
"TemplOverloaded" parameter) - but I think maybe it's for anything that
/can/ be overloaded, not necessarily only the things that are overloaded
(the argument value is hardcoded at the various callsites, doesn't seem
to depend on overload resolution/searching for overloaded functions). So
maybe with "auto" modeled more accurately, and differentiating between
function templates (always using type suffixes there) and class/variable
templates (only using the suffix for "auto" types) we could correctly
use integer type suffixes only in the minimal set of cases.
But that seems all too much fuss, so let's just put integer type
suffixes everywhere always in the debug info of integer non-type
template parameters in template names.
(more context:
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D77598#inline-1057607
* https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/ekLMllbLIZg/m/-dhJ0hO1AAAJ )
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111477
Before this patch, clang would emit a (module-)forward declaration for
template instantiations that are not anchored by an explicit template
instantiation, but still are guaranteed to be available in an imported
module. Unfortunately detecting the owning module doesn't reliably
work when local submodule visibility is enabled and the template is
inside a cross-module namespace.
This make clang debuggable again with -gmodules and LSV enabled.
rdar://problem/41552377
llvm-svn: 345109
David Blaikie