Based on the discussion at [1], this patch adds a Clang flag called
-fexperimental-library that controls whether experimental library
features are provided in libc++. In essence, it links against the
experimental static archive provided by libc++ and defines a feature
that can be picked up by libc++ to enable experimental features.
This ensures that users don't start depending on experimental
(and hence unstable) features unknowingly.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-a-compiler-flag-to-enable-experimental-unstable-language-and-library-features
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121141
No behavior change as GNU ld/gold/ld.lld ignore --dynamic-linker in -r mode.
This change makes the intention clearer as we already suppress --dynamic-linker
for -shared, -static, and -static-pie.
Reviewed by: MaskRay, phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129714
Clang uses runtime libraries for some advanced features like
sanitizers. Different systems have different preferences about file
placement. OpenBSD with this change will use this name for ASan:
/usr/lib/clang/15.0.0/lib/libclang_rt.asan.a
Already committed to OpenBSD repository then amended to cover the
case of development tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109051
Now prints the list of known archs. This requires plumbing a Driver
arg through a few functions.
Also add two more convenience insert() overlods to StringMap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109105
Object of class `Command` contains various properties of a command to
execute, but output file was missed from them. This change adds this
property. It is required for reporting consumed time and memory implemented
in D78903 and may be used in other cases too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78902
If not overridden, AddClangSystemIncludeArgs's implementation is empty, so by
default, no system include args are added to the Clang driver. This means that
invoking Clang without the frontend must include a manual -I/usr/include flag,
which is inconsistent behavior. Therefore, override and implement this method
to match. Some boilerplate is also borrowed for handling of the other driver
flags.
While we are here, also override and enable HasNativeLLVMSupport.
Patch by: 3405691582 (dana koch)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86412
specified at Command creation, rather than as part of the Tool.
This resolves the hack I just added to allow Darwin toolchain to vary
its level of support based on `-mlinker-version=`.
The change preserves the _current_ settings for response-file support.
Some tools look likely to be declaring that they don't support
response files in error, however I kept them as-is in order for this
change to be a simple refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82782
Very few ELF platforms still use .ctors/.dtors now. Linux (glibc: 1999-07),
DragonFlyBSD, FreeBSD (2012-03) and Solaris have supported .init_array
for many years. Some architectures like AArch64/RISC-V default to
.init_array . GNU ld and gold can even convert .ctors to .init_array .
It makes more sense to flip the CC1 default, and only uses
-fno-use-init-array on platforms that don't support .init_array .
For example, OpenBSD did not support DT_INIT_ARRAY before Aug 2016
(86fa57a279)
I may miss some ELF platforms that still use .ctors, but their
maintainers can easily diagnose such problems.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71393
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Base GNU ld is pretty ancient and does not support --dynamic-list flag.
For conveniency, we can it automatically when compile with ubsan sanitizer flag.
Reviewers: dberris
Reviewed by: dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48574
llvm-svn: 335856
Summary: - Since 6.2 release, on supporters platforms clang is shipped with both libcxx and libcxxabi.
Reviewers: dberris, alekseyshl, EricWF
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45662
llvm-svn: 330310
Summary:
This change fixes http://llvm.org/PR36985 to define a single place in
CommonArgs.{h,cpp} where XRay runtime flags and link-time dependencies
are processed for all toolchains that support XRay instrumentation. This
is a refactoring of the same functionality spread across multiple
toolchain definitions.
Reviewers: echristo, devnexen, eizan
Reviewed By: eizan
Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45243
llvm-svn: 329372
Summary:
This patch was originally reviewed in D45126. It enables clang to add
the XRay runtime and the link-time dependencies for XRay instrumentation
in OpenBSD.
Landing for devnexen.
Reviewers: brad, dberris
Subscribers: dberris, krytarowski, cfe-commits
Author: devnexen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45126
llvm-svn: 329183
Summary:
Basic support of Sanitiser to follow-up ubsan support in compiler-rt.
Needs to use lld instead of base ld to be fully workable.
Patch by: David CARLIER
Reviewers: krytarowski, vitalybuka, kettenis
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43961
llvm-svn: 326648
Projects that want to statically link their own C++ standard library currently
need to pass -nostdlib or -nodefaultlibs, which also disables linking of the
builtins library, -lm, and so on. Alternatively, they could use `clang` instead
of `clang++`, but that already disables implicit addition of -lm on some
toolchains.
Add a dedicated flag -nostdlib++ that disables just linking of libc++ /
libstdc++. This is analogous to -nostdinc++.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35780
llvm-svn: 308997
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Tim Northover