[Sema] Fix the assertion in Sema::ActOnDependentMemberExpr

617007240c introduced the use of ActOnDependentMemberExpr with
variable template specialization. The assertion inside
ActOnDependentMemberExpr should be adjusted accordingly.

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47211

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113146

clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprMember.cpp

@@ -504,9 +504,12 @@ Sema::ActOnDependentMemberExpr(Expr *BaseExpr, QualType BaseType,
     }
   }
 
-  assert(BaseType->isDependentType() ||
-         NameInfo.getName().isDependentName() ||
-         isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS));
+  assert(BaseType->isDependentType() || NameInfo.getName().isDependentName() ||
+         isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS) ||
+         (TemplateArgs && llvm::any_of(TemplateArgs->arguments(),
+                                       [](const TemplateArgumentLoc &Arg) {
+                                         return Arg.getArgument().isDependent();
+                                       })));
 
   // Get the type being accessed in BaseType.  If this is an arrow, the BaseExpr
   // must have pointer type, and the accessed type is the pointee.

clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-variable-templates_in_class.cpp

@@ -394,6 +394,18 @@ namespace dependent_static_var_template {
     template<int = 0> static int n; // expected-note {{here}}
   }
   int &t = B::template n; // expected-error {{use of variable template 'n' requires template arguments}}
+
+  struct C {
+    template <class T> static T G;
+  };
+  template<class T> T C::G = T(6);
+
+  template <class T> T F() {
+    C c;
+    return c.G<T>;
+  }
+
+  int cf() { return F<int>(); }
 }
 
 #ifndef PRECXX11