I've ignored most of the changes and the projects still compile and test
fine. Changes I did commit:
Add `+ use<>` after functions.
Remove `ref mut` from some patterns.
Bump MSRV.
Apply new rustfmt format.
This allows exceptions to be burned down on a per-crate basis, rather
than needing to be addressed across the whole codebase at once.
Additionally, this now follows completely the Linebender lint set,
except for the unexpected-cfgs. I don't think I've introduced any
behaviour changes in this PR.
Supercedes https://github.com/linebender/xilem/pull/411
This is designed with #417 in mind, to not lock-in to our event loop.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Mildenberger <philipp@mildenberger.me>
This was most recently updated in
https://github.com/linebender/vello/pull/505
The main differences are:
1) Greater concurrency between clippy and testing
2) More explanations
3) MSRV checking
4) Use of `cargo hack`
5) WASM checked in CI
I've also added the current values of our MSRVs to the main three
crates.
This ports xilem_web to the new xilem_core.
There's also a lot of cleanup internally:
* Get rid of all of the complex macros to support DOM interfaces, and
instead use associated type bounds on the `View::Element`.
* Introduce an extendable modifier based system, which should also work
on top of memoization (`Arc`, `Memoize`) and `OneOf` views with an
intersection of the modifiable properties.
* This modifier based system gets rid of the hacky way to propagate
attributes to elements, and takes inspiration by masonrys `WidgetMut`
type to apply changes.
* Currently that means `Attributes`, `Classes` and `Styles` to reflect
what xilem_web previously offered.
Downsides (currently, needs some investigation):
~~Due to more internal type complexity via associated types this suffers
from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105900. The new trait
solver should hopefully mitigate some of that, but it seems currently it
completely stalls in the todomvc example (not in other examples).~~
~~The deep, possibly completely static composition via associated
type-bounds of the view and element tree unfortunately can take some
time to compile, this gets (already) obvious in the todomvc example. The
other examples don't seem to suffer that bad yet from that issue,
probably because they're quite simple.~~
~~I really hope we can mitigate this mostly, because I think this is the
idiomatic (and more correct) way to implement what the previous API has
offered.~~
One idea is to add a `Box<dyn AnyViewSequence>`, as every element takes
a "type-erased" `ViewSequence` as parameter, so this may solve most of
the issues (at the slight cost of dynamic dispatch/allocations).
Edit: idea was mostly successful, see comment right below.
I think it also closes#274
It's a draft, as there's a lot of changes in xilem_core that should be
upstreamed (and cleaned up) via separate PRs and I would like to
(mostly) fix the slow-compile time issue.
---------
Co-authored-by: Daniel McNab <36049421+DJMcNab@users.noreply.github.com>
This adds yet another generic parameter `Message` to the `View`,
`ViewSequence` and `AnyView` trait, such that implementors have more
freedom about what the message is. This is necessary for xilem_web, as a
`Send` bound is not possible to use with wasm_bindgen IIRC. (At least I
had to remove it in the `DynMessage` to get it to compile...).
It was fortunately straight-forward to just add the `Message` param with
the default `DynMessage`. Basically search replace... (I hope I haven't
missed anything, but I went through it twice...)
This:
1) Renames the current/old `xilem_core` to `xilem_web_core` and moves it
to the `xilem_web/xilem_web_core` folder
2) Creates a new `xilem_core`, which does not use (non-tuple) macros and
instead contains a `View` trait which is generic over the `Context` type
3) Ports `xilem` to this `xilem_core`, but with some functionality
missing (namely a few of the extra views; I expect these to
straightforward to port)
4) Ports the `mason` and `mason_android` examples to this new `xilem`,
with less functionality.
This continues ideas first explored in #235
The advantages of this new View trait are:
1) Improved support for ad-hoc views, such as views with additional
attributes.
This will be very useful for layout algorithms, and will also enable
native *good* multi-window (and potentially menus?)
2) A lack of macros, to better enable using go-to-definition and other
IDE features on the traits
Possible disadvantages:
1) There are a few more traits to enable the flexibility
2) It can be less clear what `Self::Element::Mut` is in the `rebuild`
function, because of how the resolution works
3) When implementing `View`, you need to specify the context (i.e.
`impl<State, Action> View<State, Action, [new] ViewCtx> for
Button<State, Action>`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Philipp Mildenberger <philipp@mildenberger.me>
Olivier FAURE