Motivation:
As we've largely completed our move to split out our core abstractions,
we now have an opportunity to clean up our dependencies and imports. We
should arrange for everything to only import NIO if it actually needs
it, and to correctly express dependencies on NIOCore and NIOEmbedded
where they exist.
We aren't yet splitting out tests that only test functionality in
NIOCore, that will follow in a separate patch.
Modifications:
- Fixed up imports
- Made sure our protocols only require NIOCore.
Result:
Better expression of dependencies.
Co-authored-by: George Barnett <gbarnett@apple.com>
Motivation:
There are multiple sub-optimal ByteBuffer creation patterns that occur
in the wild. Most often they happen when people don't actually have
access to a `Channel` just want to "convert" a `String` into a
`ByteBuffer`. To do this, they are forced to type
var buffer = ByteBufferAllocator().buffer(capacity: string.utf8.count)
buffer.writeString(string)
Sometimes, they don't get the capacity calculation right or just put a
`0`.
Similar problems happen if NIO users want to cache a ByteBuffer in their
`ChannelHandler`. You will then find this code:
```swift
if self.buffer == nil {
self.buffer = receivedBuffer
} else {
var receivedBuffer = receivedBuffer
self.buffer!.writeBuffer(&receivedBuffer)
}
```
And lastly, sometimes people want to append one `ByteBuffer` to another
without mutating the appendee. That's also cumbersome because we only
support a mutable version of `writeBuffer`.
Modifications:
- add `ByteBuffer` convenience initialisers
- add convenience `writeBuffer` methods to `Optional<ByteBuffer>`
- add `writeBufferImmutable` which doesn't mutate the appendee.
Result:
More convenience.
Co-authored-by: Cory Benfield <lukasa@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Cory Benfield <lukasa@apple.com>
Motivation:
ByteBuffer methods like `set(string:)` never felt very Swift-like and
also didn't look the same as their counterparts like `getString(...)`.
Modifications:
- rename all `ByteBuffer.set/write(<type>:,...)` methods to
`ByteBuffer.set/write<Type>(...)`
- polyfill the old spellings in `_NIO1APIShims`
Result:
code more Swift-like
match all values in HTTPHeaders.isKeepAlive(...)
HTTPHeaders.isKeepAlive(...) does only match the first value.
### Motivation:
Keep-alive and Close may be something on comma separated arrays
### Modifications:
- Made an extension function to `ByteBuffer` that could separate the strings at low level, without Swift string API, so that it could split the values
- Another extension functions that compares the comma separated array with a given array to tell the caller which exists and which no
- Added unit tests for them
- Used them in the HTTPHeader
### Result:
- Now, if a request is sent using Keep-alive or Close where it was in an array, it will be handled
- fixes#410
Cory Benfield