Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jehan 61f380789e libgimp: all blurbs to GimpProcedure arguments are nullable.
Without this, we cannot set NULL (or equivalent, such as None in Python
3) when calling these functions in bindings.
2025-02-15 17:42:52 +01:00
Jehan 161b3c5331 Issue #12045: no defaults for plugin args of type File.
libgimpbase:

  - Mew GimpFileChooserAction enum type: basically a near-mapping of
    GtkFileChooserAction (GTK is not accessible from libgimpbase) with
    an added GIMP_FILE_CHOOSER_ACTION_ANY.
  - New GimpParamSpecFile param spec type: based off
    GimpParamSpecObject, it has a default value, but also a none_ok and
    action argument. This way, we can also know from the argument type
    if this is a file argument meant for selecting a normal file or a
    folder, or for saving into a file, or for creating a directory.

libgimp, plug-ins:

  - All existing file arguments (until now using a standard
    GParamSpecObject param with GFile value type) were moved to the new
    GimpParamSpecFile.
  - Script-Fu in particular will now generate the appropriate param type
    depending on whether it is an SF-FILENAME or SF-DIRNAME.
  - File arguments are now stored between runs as a URI rather than as a
    path. As far as I can tell, a GFile always has a URI, but not always
    a path (in particular remote file won't have a path).
2025-01-22 17:53:21 +01:00
Jehan dc3e815ff0 app, libgimp*, pdb, plug-ins: rename various public API name s/float/double/.
Several types functions were using the wording "float" historically to
mean double-precision, e.g. the float array type (which was in fact a
double array). Or the scanner function gimp_scanner_parse_float() was in
fact returning a double value. What if we wanted someday to actually add
float (usually this naming means in C the single-precision IEEE 754
floating point representation) support? How would we name this?

Now technically it's not entirely wrong (a double is still a floating
point). So I've been wondering if that is because maybe we never planned
to have float and double precision may be good enough for all usage in a
plug-in API (which doesn't have to be as generic so the higher precision
is enough)? But how can we be sure? Also we already had some functions
using the wording double (e.g. gimp_procedure_add_double_argument()), so
let's just go the safe route and use the accurate wording.

The additional change in PDB is internal, but there too, I was also
finding very confusing that we were naming double-precision float as
'float' type. So I took the opportunity to update this. It doesn't
change any signature.

In fact the whole commit doesn't change any type or code logic, only
naming, except for one bug fix in the middle which I encountered while
renaming: in gimp_scanner_parse_deprecated_color(), I discovered a
hidden bug in scanning (color-hsv*) values, which was mistakenly using a
double type for an array of float.
2024-11-02 15:00:03 +01:00
Jehan 4137dce97b libgimp*: get rid of GimpObjectArray and GimpParamSpecObjectArray.
These have now been completely replace with the new GimpCoreObjectArray.
2024-10-25 23:28:42 +02:00
Jehan e1e2941d9e app, libgimp*, plug-ins: move all GimpObjectArray procedure args to GimpCoreObjectArray. 2024-10-25 23:28:42 +02:00
Jehan 75a50ce87b app, libgimp, pdb, plug-ins: add ability to default to context for all resource args.
Also fixes the passing of the resource param definitions through PDB.
There was some weird assumption, with a comment, in commit 73733335c8
that this was unneeded, which meant that we were not able to properly
recreate the right param spec over the wire.
2024-09-06 16:33:24 +02:00
Jehan ba3da3d338 app, libgimp*, pdb: new GimpParamSpecObject abstract spec type.
This abstract spec type is basically a GParamSpecObject with a default
value. It will be used by various object spec with default values, such
as GimpParamSpecColor, GimpParamSpecUnit and all GimpParamSpecResource
subtypes. Also it has a duplicate() class method so that every spec type
can implement the proper way to duplicate itself.

This fixes the fact that in gimp_config_param_spec_duplicate(), all
unknown object spec types (because they are implemented in libgimp,
which is invisible to libgimpconfig) are just copied as
GParamSpecObject, hence losing default values and other parameters.

As a second enhancement, it also makes it easier to detect the object
spec types for which we have default value support in
gimp_config_reset_properties().

As a side fix, gimp_param_spec_color() now just always duplicates the
passed default color, making it hence much easier to avoid bugs when
reusing a GeglColor.
2024-09-04 22:34:49 +02:00
bootchk 73733335c8 libgimp: plugins: fix #10950 resource defaults not effective
Now you can declare a default value when declaring resource arguments to
a PDB procedure.

Add default behavior to GimpParamSpecResource.
Add field and override g_param_spec_value_set_default.

Fix the plugins that have resource arguments.
Some plugins temporarily use a hardcoded default instead of declared default.
ScriptFu plugins, TODO.

Misc fix to the test plugin for this case: test-dialog.py.
Dev>Demo>Test dialog...

TODO 10822 Lava plugin issue depends on this.

Note film.c fixed but still doesn't work.
2024-09-04 21:32:28 +02:00
Jehan d493f0537f Issue #8900 and #9923: reimplementing GimpUnit as a proper class.
This fixes all our GObject Introspection issues with GimpUnit which was
both an enum and an int-derived type of user-defined units *completing*
the enum values. GIR clearly didn't like this!

Now GimpUnit is a proper class and units are unique objects, allowing to
compare them with an identity test (i.e. `unit == gimp_unit_pixel ()`
tells us if unit is the pixel unit or not), which makes it easy to use,
just like with int, yet adding also methods, making for nicer
introspected API.

As an aside, this also fixes #10738, by having all the built-in units
retrievable even if libgimpbase had not been properly initialized with
gimp_base_init().
I haven't checked in details how GIR works to introspect, but it looks
like it loads the library to inspect and runs functions, hence
triggering some CRITICALS because virtual methods (supposed to be
initialized with gimp_base_init() run by libgimp) are not set. This new
code won't trigger any critical because the vtable method are now not
necessary, at least for all built-in units.

Note that GimpUnit is still in libgimpbase. It could have been moved to
libgimp in order to avoid any virtual method table (since we need to
keep core and libgimp side's units in sync, PDB is required), but too
many libgimpwidgets widgets were already using GimpUnit. And technically
most of GimpUnit logic doesn't require PDB (only the creation/sync
part). This is one of the reasons why user-created GimpUnit list is
handled and stored differently from other types of objects.

Globally this simplifies the code a lot too and we don't need separate
implementations of various utils for core and libgimp, which means less
prone to errors.
2024-08-02 10:46:38 +02:00
Alx Sa 2e6938b3da app: Rename app/core GimpVectors vectors API...
...to path.
Changes the names of
gimp_vectors_* () API to
gimp_path[s]_* (). Renames related files
to [path] instead of [vectors], along with
relevant enums and functions.
2024-07-13 05:07:57 +00:00
Alx Sa e8df68fb65 libgimp, app, pdb: Rename GimpVectors to GimpPath
This commit renames the GimpVectors
object to GimpPath in both app/core and
in libgimp. It also renames the files
to gimppath.[ch] and updates the relevant
build and translation files.
There are still outstanding gimp_vectors_* ()
functions on the app side that need to be renamed
in a subsequent commit.
2024-07-12 06:16:25 +00:00
Jehan b1736a6736 app, libgimp, pdb, plug-ins: new GimpGroupLayer class in libgimp.
Also:

- renaming gimp_layer_group_new() to gimp_group_layer_new() in order to keep the
  same name as in core code (i.e. GimpGroupLayer, not GimpLayerGroup).
- renaming gimp_image_merge_layer_group() to gimp_group_layer_merge()
- new functions: gimp_procedure_add_group_layer_argument(),
  gimp_procedure_add_group_layer_aux_argument() and
  gimp_procedure_add_group_layer_return_value().

This can be tested, e.g. in Python with these calls:

```py
i = Gimp.get_images()[0]
g = Gimp.GroupLayer.new(i, "hello")
i.insert_layer(g, None, 1)
g2 = Gimp.GroupLayer.new(i, "world")
i.insert_layer(g2, g, 1)
g.merge()
```

This was work started long ago, stored in an old stash which I finally
finish now! :-)
2024-07-07 10:27:04 +02:00
Jehan ac030a0cd7 libgimp, plug-ins: make generic gimp_procedure_add_argument() private.
Same for gimp_procedure_add_aux_argument() and gimp_procedure_add_return_value().

We now have specific public functions for every supported type and it's
in fact much better to use them. The generic functions gave the feeling
that we could use any GParamSpec as procedure argument, whereas we in
fact depend on what the PDB support, and only these subtypes.
2024-07-06 14:44:45 +02:00
Jehan 6d36d143e8 libgimp, plug-ins: fix gimp_procedure_add_*_argument() where `*` is a resource type.
The correspondant param specs' fourth arg was a `none_ok` boolean, not a
type. Carry over this argument to the gimp_procedure_add_*() function.
2024-07-06 14:44:45 +02:00
Alx Sa d1c4457fa3 libgimp: Convert gimpprocedure-params macros to functions
In order for Python plug-ins to be able
to create custom parameters like
GeglColor and GimpChoice, we need to
create actual functions rather than
using macros. A subsequent commit
will update all plug-ins to use them.
2024-06-10 15:22:02 +00:00