This change adds a new type node, DeducedTemplateSpecializationType, to
represent a type template name that has been used as a type. This is modeled
around AutoType, and shares a common base class for representing a deduced
placeholder type.
We allow deduced class template types in a few more places than the standard
does: in conditions and for-range-declarators, and in new-type-ids. This is
consistent with GCC and with discussion on the core reflector. This patch
does not yet support deduced class template types being named in typename
specifiers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@293207 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diagnose the case when a dependent template name instantiates to an
injected-class-name outside a nested-name-specifier.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@292545 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds support for codegen of 'target parallel' on the host.
It is also the first combined directive that requires two or more
captured statements. Support for this functionality is included in
the patch.
A combined directive such as 'target parallel' has two captured
statements, one for the 'target' and the other for the 'parallel'
region. Two captured statements are required because each has
different implicit parameters (see SemaOpenMP.cpp). For example,
the 'parallel' has 'global_tid' and 'bound_tid' while the 'target'
does not. The patch adds support for handling multiple captured
statements based on the combined directive.
When codegen'ing the 'target parallel' directive, the 'target'
outlined function is created using the outer captured statement
and the 'parallel' outlined function is created using the inner
captured statement.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28753
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@292419 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds support for codegen of 'target parallel' on the host.
It is also the first combined directive that requires two or more
captured statements. Support for this functionality is included in
the patch.
A combined directive such as 'target parallel' has two captured
statements, one for the 'target' and the other for the 'parallel'
region. Two captured statements are required because each has
different implicit parameters (see SemaOpenMP.cpp). For example,
the 'parallel' has 'global_tid' and 'bound_tid' while the 'target'
does not. The patch adds support for handling multiple captured
statements based on the combined directive.
When codegen'ing the 'target parallel' directive, the 'target'
outlined function is created using the outer captured statement
and the 'parallel' outlined function is created using the inner
captured statement.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28753
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@292374 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
We do not currently track the source locations for exception specifications such
that their source range can be queried through the AST. This leads to trying to
write more complex code to determine the source range for uses like FixItHints
(see D18575 for an example). In addition to use within tools like clang-tidy, I
think this information may become more important to track as exception
specifications become more integrated into the type system.
Patch by Don Hinton.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, sbarzowski, alexfh, hintonda, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20428
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@291771 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
This is a re-commit of r290080 (reverted in r290092) with a fix for a
use-after-lifetime bug.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@290203 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@290080 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
lambda expression is instantiated.
Rather than waiting until Sema::CheckCXXDefaultArgExpr tries to
transform the default arguments (which fails because it can't get the
template arguments that are used), transform the default arguments
earlier when the lambda expression is transformed in
TransformLambdaExpr.
rdar://problem/27535319
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23096
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@289990 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
initialization of each array element:
* ArrayInitLoopExpr is a prvalue of array type with two subexpressions:
a common expression (an OpaqueValueExpr) that represents the up-front
computation of the source of the initialization, and a subexpression
representing a per-element initializer
* ArrayInitIndexExpr is a prvalue of type size_t representing the current
position in the loop
This will be used to replace the creation of explicit index variables in lambda
capture of arrays and copy/move construction of classes with array elements,
and also C++17 structured bindings of arrays by value (which inexplicably allow
copying an array by value, unlike all of C++'s other array declarations).
No uses of these nodes are introduced by this change, however.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@289413 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Other compilers accept invalid code here that we reject, and we need a
better error message to try to convince users that the code is really
incorrect. Consider:
class Foo {
typedef MyIterHelper<Foo> iterator;
friend class iterator;
};
Previously our wording was "elaborated type refers to a typedef".
"elaborated type" isn't widely known terminology, so the new diagnostic
says "typedef 'iterator' cannot be referenced with class specifier".
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25216
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@289259 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch adds semantic checking and building of the fall-through `co_return;` statement as well as the `p.set_exception(std::current_exception())` call for handling uncaught exceptions.
The fall-through statement is built and checked according to:
> [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/4
> The unqualified-ids return_void and return_value are looked up in the scope of class P. If
> both are found, the program is ill-formed. If the unqualified-id return_void is found, flowing
> off the end of a coroutine is equivalent to a co_return with no operand. Otherwise, flowing off
> the end of a coroutine results in undefined behavior.
Similarly the `set_exception` call is only built when that unqualified-id is found in the scope of class P.
Additionally this patch adds fall-through warnings for non-void returning coroutines. Since it's surprising undefined behavior I thought it would be important to add the warning right away.
Reviewers: majnemer, GorNishanov, rsmith
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25349
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@285271 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This has the following ABI impact:
1) Functions whose parameter or return types are non-throwing function pointer
types have different manglings in c++1z mode from prior modes. This is
necessary because c++1z permits overloading on the noexceptness of function
pointer parameter types. A warning is issued for cases that will change
manglings in c++1z mode.
2) Functions whose parameter or return types contain instantiation-dependent
exception specifications change manglings in all modes. This is necessary
to support overloading on / SFINAE in these exception specifications, which
a careful reading of the standard indicates has essentially always been
permitted.
Note that, in order to be affected by these changes, the code in question must
specify an exception specification on a function pointer/reference type that is
written syntactically within the declaration of another function. Such
declarations are very rare, and I have so far been unable to find any code
that would be affected by this. (Note that such things will probably become
more common in C++17, since it's a lot easier to get a noexcept function type
as a function parameter / return type there.)
This change does not affect the set of symbols produced by a build of clang,
libc++, or libc++abi.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@285150 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
has no field declaration.
This commit fixes an invalid Winitializer-overrides warning that's shown
when analyzing a second (or any after the first) instantiation of a designated
initializer. This invalid warning is fixed by making sure that a
DesignatedInitExpr is rebuilt by the tree transformer when it has a field
designator whose FieldDecl* hasn't been yet initialized. This ensures that a
different DesignatedInitExpr is processed by Sema for every instantiation, and
thus the invalid warning is avoided.
rdar://28768441
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25777
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@284959 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
corresponding arguments are unexpanded pack expansions, we can compute the
result without substituting them. This significantly improves the memory usage
and performance of make_integer_sequence implementations that do this kind of
thing:
using result = integer_sequence<T, Ns ..., sizeof...(Ns) + Ns ...>;
... but note that such an implementation will still perform O(sizeof...(Ns)^2)
work while building the second pack expansion (we just have a somewhat lower
constant now).
In principle we could get this down to linear time by caching whether the
number of expansions of a pack is constant, or checking whether we're within an
alias template before scanning the pack for pack expansions (since that's the
only case in which we do substitutions within a dependent context at the
moment), but this patch doesn't attempt that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@284653 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We also need to add ObjCTypeParamTypeLoc. ObjCTypeParamType supports the
representation of "T <protocol>" where T is a type parameter. Before this,
we use TypedefType to represent the type parameter for ObjC.
ObjCTypeParamType has "ObjCTypeParamDecl *OTPDecl" and it extends from
ObjCProtocolQualifiers. It is a non-canonical type and is canonicalized
to the underlying type with the protocol qualifiers.
rdar://24619481
rdar://25060179
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23079
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@281355 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix crash-on-invalid in ObjC Sema by avoiding to rebuild a message
expression to a 'super' class in case the method to call does not exist
(i.e. comes from another missing identifier).
In this case, the typo transform is invoked upon the message expression
in an attempt to solve a typo in a 'super' call parameters, but it
crashes since it assumes the method to call has a valid declaration.
rdar://problem/27305403
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@279481 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Functions of Sema that work with building of nested name specifiers have too
many parameters (BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier already expects 10 arguments).
With this change the information about identifier and its context is packed
into a structure, which is then passes to the semantic functions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@277976 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
if (stmt; condition) { ... }
Patch by Anton Bikineev! Some minor formatting and comment tweets by me.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@275350 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21904
This patch is similar to the implementation of 'private' clause: it adds a list of private pointers to be used within the target data region to store the device pointers returned by the runtime.
Please refer to the following document for a full description of what the runtime witll return in this case (page 10 and 11):
https://github.com/clang-omp/OffloadingDesign
I am happy to answer any question related to the runtime interface to help reviewing this patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@275271 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The problem is that the parameter pack in a function type type alias is not
reexpanded after being transformed. Also remove an incorrect comment in a
similar function. Fixes PR26017.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21030
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@274566 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
No semantic analysis yet.
This is a pain to disambiguate correctly, because the parsing rules for the
declaration form of a condition and of an init-statement are quite different --
for a token sequence that looks like a declaration, we frequently need to
disambiguate all the way to the ')' or ';'.
We could do better here in some cases by stopping disambiguation once we've
decided whether we've got an expression or not (rather than keeping going until
we know whether it's an init-statement declaration or a condition declaration),
by unifying our parsing code for the two types of declaration and moving the
syntactic checks into Sema; if this has a measurable impact on parsing
performance, I'll look into that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@274169 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@274049 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse and sema for composite pragma 'distribute parallel for'
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@273884 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21564
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@273705 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-Wfor-loop-analysis warnings for a for-loop with a condition variable. In such
a case, the loop condition variable is modified on each iteration of the loop
by definition.
Original commit message:
Rearrange condition handling so that semantic checks on a condition variable
are performed before the other substatements of the construct are parsed,
rather than deferring them until the end. This allows better error recovery
from semantic errors in the condition, improves diagnostic order, and is a
prerequisite for C++17 constexpr if.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@273600 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Richard Smith