We could in principle support such pack expansion, using techniques similar to
what we do for pack expansion of lambdas, but it's not clear it's worthwhile.
For now at least, cleanly reject these cases rather than crashing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@324160 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- reverts r321622, r321625, and r321626.
- the use of bit-fields is still resulting in warnings - even though we can use static-asserts to harden the code and ensure the bit-fields are wide enough. The bots still complain of warnings being seen.
- to silence the warnings requires specifying the bit-fields with the underlying enum type (as opposed to the enum type itself), which then requires lots of unnecessary static casts of each enumerator within DeclSpec to the underlying-type, which even though could be seen as implementation details, it does hamper readability - and given the additional litterings, makes me question the value of the change.
So in short - I give up (for now at least).
Sorry about the noise.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@321628 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- the enum changes to TypeSpecifierType are breaking some tests - and will require a more careful integration.
Sorry about rushing these changes - thought I could sneak them in prior to heading out for new years ;)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@321616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a recommit of r312781; in some build configurations
variable names are omitted, so changed the new regression
test accordingly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@312794 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The clang-with-lto-ubuntu bot didn't like the new regression
test, revert while I investigate the issue.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@312784 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds _Float16 as a source language type, which is a 16-bit floating point
type defined in C11 extension ISO/IEC TS 18661-3.
In follow up patches documentation and more tests will be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33719
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@312781 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fixes a selection of rejects-valids when pack-expanding a lambda that itself
contains a pack expansion.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@310972 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We model deduction-guides as functions with a new kind of name that identifies
the template whose deduction they guide; the bulk of this patch is adding the
new name kind. This gives us a clean way to attach an extensible list of guides
to a class template in a way that doesn't require any special handling in AST
files etc (and we're going to need these functions we come to performing
deduction).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@294266 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
This is a re-commit of r290080 (reverted in r290092) with a fix for a
use-after-lifetime bug.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@290203 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@290080 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This saves two pointers from FunctionDecl that were being used for some
rare and questionable C-only functionality. The DeclsInPrototypeScope
ArrayRef was added in r151712 in order to parse this kind of C code:
enum e {x, y};
int f(enum {y, x} n) {
return x; // should return 1, not 0
}
The challenge is that we parse 'int f(enum {y, x} n)' it its own
function prototype scope that gets popped before we build the
FunctionDecl for 'f'. The original change was doing two questionable
things:
1. Saving all tag decls introduced in prototype scope on a TU-global
Sema variable. This is problematic when you have cases like this, where
'x' and 'y' shouldn't be visible in 'f':
void f(void (*fp)(enum { x, y } e)) { /* no x */ }
This patch fixes that, so now 'f' can't see 'x', which is consistent
with GCC.
2. Storing the decls in FunctionDecl in ActOnFunctionDeclarator so that
they could be used in ActOnStartOfFunctionDef. This is just an
inefficient way to move information around. The AST lives forever, but
the list of non-parameter decls in prototype scope is short lived.
Moving these things to the Declarator solves both of these issues.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: jmolloy, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27279
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@289225 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
corresponding arguments are unexpanded pack expansions, we can compute the
result without substituting them. This significantly improves the memory usage
and performance of make_integer_sequence implementations that do this kind of
thing:
using result = integer_sequence<T, Ns ..., sizeof...(Ns) + Ns ...>;
... but note that such an implementation will still perform O(sizeof...(Ns)^2)
work while building the second pack expansion (we just have a somewhat lower
constant now).
In principle we could get this down to linear time by caching whether the
number of expansions of a pack is constant, or checking whether we're within an
alias template before scanning the pack for pack expansions (since that's the
only case in which we do substitutions within a dependent context at the
moment), but this patch doesn't attempt that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@284653 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is only a crash if the compiler optimize for this!=nullptr because
LocalInstantiationScope::getPartiallySubstitutedPack checks if 'this' is null
(This is crashing when clang is compiled with GCC6)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20511
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@270845 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch corresponds to reviews:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120http://reviews.llvm.org/D19125
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and target feature to
enable it. Based on the latter of the two aforementioned reviews, this feature
is enabled on Linux on i386/X86 as well as SystemZ.
This is also the second attempt in commiting this feature. The first attempt
did not enable it on required platforms which caused failures when compiling
type_traits with -std=gnu++11.
If you see failures with compiling this header on your platform after this
commit, it is likely that your platform needs to have this feature enabled.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@268898 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Since this patch provided support for the __float128 type but disabled it
on all platforms by default, some platforms can't compile type_traits with
-std=gnu++11 since there is a specialization with __float128.
This reverts the patch until D19125 is approved (i.e. we know which platforms
need this support enabled).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@266460 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and a target feature to
enable it. This support is disabled by default on all targets and any target
that has support for this type is free to add it.
Based on feedback that I've received from target maintainers, this appears to
be the right thing for most targets. I have not heard from the maintainers of
X86 which I believe supports this type. I will subsequently investigate the
impact of enabling this on X86.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@266186 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Putting OpenCLImageTypes.def to clangAST library violates layering requirement: "It's not OK for a Basic/ header to include an AST/ header".
This fixes the modules build.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18954
Reviewers: Richard Smith, Vassil Vassilev.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@266180 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I. Current implementation of images is not conformant to spec in the following points:
1. It makes no distinction with respect to access qualifiers and therefore allows to use images with different access type interchangeably. The following code would compile just fine:
void write_image(write_only image2d_t img);
kernel void foo(read_only image2d_t img) { write_image(img); } // Accepted code
which is disallowed according to s6.13.14.
2. It discards access qualifier on generated code, which leads to generated code for the above example:
call void @write_image(%opencl.image2d_t* %img);
In OpenCL2.0 however we can have different calls into write_image with read_only and wite_only images.
Also generally following compiler steps have no easy way to take different path depending on the image access: linking to the right implementation of image types, performing IR opts and backend codegen differently.
3. Image types are language keywords and can't be redeclared s6.1.9, which can happen currently as they are just typedef names.
4. Default access qualifier read_only is to be added if not provided explicitly.
II. This patch corrects the above points as follows:
1. All images are encapsulated into a separate .def file that is inserted in different points where image handling is required. This avoid a lot of code repetition as all images are handled the same way in the code with no distinction of their exact type.
2. The Cartesian product of image types and image access qualifiers is added to the builtin types. This simplifies a lot handling of access type mismatch as no operations are allowed by default on distinct Builtin types. Also spec intended access qualifier as special type qualifier that are combined with an image type to form a distinct type (see statement above - images can't be created w/o access qualifiers).
3. Improves testing of images in Clang.
Author: Anastasia Stulova
Reviewers: bader, mgrang.
Subscribers: pxli168, pekka.jaaskelainen, yaxunl.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17821
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@265783 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Support for OpenCL 2.0 pipe type.
This is a bug-fix version for bader's patch reviews.llvm.org/D14441
Reviewers: pekka.jaaskelainen, Anastasia
Subscribers: bader, Anastasia, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15603
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@257254 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Typeof.html
Differences from the GCC extension:
* __auto_type is also permitted in C++ (but only in places where
it could appear in C), allowing its use in headers that might
be shared across C and C++, or used from C++98
* __auto_type can be combined with a declarator, as with C++ auto
(for instance, "__auto_type *p")
* multiple variables can be declared in a single __auto_type
declaration, with the C++ semantics (the deduced type must be
the same in each case)
This patch also adds a missing restriction on applying typeof to
a bit-field, which GCC has historically rejected in C (due to
lack of clarity as to whether the operand should be promoted).
The same restriction also applies to __auto_type in C (in both
GCC and Clang).
This also fixes PR25449.
Patch by Nicholas Allegra!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@252690 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This doesn't quite get alias template equivalence right yet, but handles the
egregious cases where we would silently give the wrong answers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@248431 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@240270 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
clang tries to produce a helpful diagnostic for the traiilng '...', but the
code that r216778 added for this doesn't expect an invalid trailing return type.
Add code to explicitly handle this.
Having explicit code for this but not for other things looks a bit strange, but
trailing return types are special in that they have a separate existence bit in
addition to the type (see r158348).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@224974 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a new form of expression of the form:
(expr op ... op expr)
where one of the exprs is a parameter pack. It expands into
(expr1 op (expr2onwards op ... op expr))
(and likewise if the pack is on the right). The non-pack operand can be
omitted; in that case, an empty pack gives a fallback value or an error,
depending on the operator.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@221573 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
it. Diagnose with recovery if it appears after a function parameter that was
obviously supposed to be a parameter pack. Otherwise, warn if it immediately
follows a function parameter pack, because the user most likely didn't intend
to write a parameter pack followed by a C-style varargs ellipsis.
This warning can be syntactically disabled by using ", ..." instead of "...".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@215408 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@198686 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit kills off custom type specifier and keyword handling of OpenCL C
data types.
Although the OpenCL spec describes them as keywords, we can handle them more
elegantly as predefined types. This should provide better error correction and
code completion as well as simplifying the implementation.
The primary intention is however to simplify the C/C++ parser and save some
packed bits on AST structures that had been extended in r170432 just for
OpenCL.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@197578 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
preparation for teaching this function how to diagnose a correction that
includes importing a module.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@188602 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
up alignment.
Fixes utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.creation/tuple_cat.pass.cpp from the
libc++ testsuite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@184397 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
correctly in the presence of qualified types.
(I had to change the unittest because it was trying to cast a
QualifiedTypeLoc to TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@183563 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This introduces bugs in TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc's angle bracket
locations.
Regression test follows in a subsequent commit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@183513 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
correctly aligned. Not performing such computations led to misaligned loads,
which crash on some platforms and are generally bad on other platforms.
The implementation of TypeLocBuilder::pushImpl is rather messy; code using
TypeLocBuilder accidentally assumes that partial TypeLocs are
laid out like a complete TypeLoc. As a followup, I intend to work on
fixing the TypeLocBuilder API to avoid exposing partial TypeLocs; this should
substantially simplify the implemementation.
Fixes PR16144.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@183466 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a FieldDecl from it, and propagate both into the closure type and the
LambdaExpr.
You can't do much useful with them yet -- you can't use them within the body
of the lambda, because we don't have a representation for "the this of the
lambda, not the this of the enclosing context". We also don't have support or a
representation for a nested capture of an init-capture yet, which was intended
to work despite not being allowed by the current standard wording.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@181985 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Richard Smith