This patch fixes a regression introduced in r262697 that changed the way the
coverage regions for switches are constructed. The PGO instrumentation counter
for a switch statement refers to the counter at the exit of the switch.
Therefore, the coverage region for the switch statement should cover the code
that comes after the switch, and not the switch statement itself.
rdar://28480997
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24981
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@282554 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While pushing switch statements onto the region stack we neglected to
specify their start/end locations. This results in a crash (PR26825) if
we end up in nested macro expansions without enough information to
handle the relevant file exits.
I added a test in switchmacro.c and fixed up a bunch of incorrect CHECK
lines that specify strange end locations for switches.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@262697 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch changes cc1 option -fprofile-instr-generate to an enum option
-fprofile-instrument={clang|none}. It also changes cc1 options
-fprofile-instr-generate= to -fprofile-instrument-path=.
The driver level option -fprofile-instr-generate and -fprofile-instr-generate=
remain intact. This change will pave the way to integrate new PGO
instrumentation in IR level.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16730
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@259811 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When tools like llvm-cov show regions, it's much easier to understand
what's happening if the condition of an if shows a counter as well as
the body.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@229813 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The coverage mapping generation code previously generated a large
number of redundant coverage regions and then tried to merge similar
ones back together. This then relied on some awkward heuristics to
prevent combining of regions that were importantly different but
happened to have the same count. The end result was inefficient and
hard to follow.
Now, we more carefully create the regions we actually want. This makes
it much easier to create regions at precise locations as well as
making the basic approach quite a bit easier to follow. There's still
a fair bit of complexity here dealing with included code and macro
expansions, but that's pretty hard to avoid without significantly
reducing the quality of data we provide.
I had to modify quite a few tests where the source ranges became more
precise or the old ranges seemed to be wrong anyways, and I've added
quite a few new tests since a large number of constructs didn't seem
to be tested before.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@229748 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Alex Lorenz