This time, I went with the first approach from
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6700, where clang actually attempts to form an
implicit member reference from an UnresolvedLookupExpr. We know that
there are only two possible outcomes at this point, a DeclRefExpr of the
FieldDecl or an error, but its safer to reuse the existing machinery for
this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@250856 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r250592.
It has issues around unevaluated contexts, like this:
template <class T> struct A { T i; };
template <class T>
struct B : A<T> {
using A<T>::i;
typedef decltype(i) U;
};
template struct B<int>;
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@250774 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
During the initial template parse for this code, 'member' is unresolved
and we don't know anything about it:
struct A { int member };
template <typename T>
struct B : public T {
using T::member;
static void f() {
(void)member; // Could be static or non-static.
}
};
template class B<A>;
The pattern declaration contains an UnresolvedLookupExpr rather than an
UnresolvedMemberExpr because `f` is static, and `member` should never be
a field. However, if the code is invalid, it may become a field, in
which case we should diagnose it.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6700
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@250592 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Parsing and sema analysis for 'simd' clause in 'ordered' directive.
Description
If the simd clause is specified, the ordered regions encountered by any thread will use only a single SIMD lane to execute the ordered
regions in the order of the loop iterations.
Restrictions
An ordered construct with the simd clause is the only OpenMP construct that can appear in the simd region
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@248696 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
OpenMP 4.1 extends format of '#pragma omp ordered'. It adds 3 additional clauses: 'threads', 'simd' and 'depend'.
If no clause is specified, the ordered construct behaves as if the threads clause had been specified. If the threads clause is specified, the threads in the team executing the loop region execute ordered regions sequentially in the order of the loop iterations.
The loop region to which an ordered region without any clause or with a threads clause binds must have an ordered clause without the parameter specified on the corresponding loop directive.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@248569 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This doesn't quite get alias template equivalence right yet, but handles the
egregious cases where we would silently give the wrong answers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@248431 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
OpenMP 4.1 added special 'directive-name-modifier' to the 'if' clause.
Format of 'if' clause is as follows:
```
if([ directive-name-modifier :] scalar-logical-expression)
```
The restriction rules are also changed.
1. If any 'if' clause on the directive includes a 'directive-name-modifier' then all 'if' clauses on the directive must include a 'directive-name-modifier'.
2. At most one 'if' clause without a 'directive-name-modifier' can appear on the directive.
3. At most one 'if' clause with some particular 'directive-name-modifier' can appear on the directive.
'directive-name-modifier' is important for combined directives and allows to separate conditions in 'if' clause for simple sub-directives in combined directive. This 'directive-name-modifier' identifies the sub-directive to which this 'if' clause must be applied.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@246747 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
`OpaqueValueExpr`s may not have a source expression (as in the case when
they are created due to a default argument error).
This can cause an assertion failure in `TransformOpaqueValueExpr` during
template instantiation.
This patch fixes the assertion failure.
Reviewers: hfinkel, rsmith
Subscribers: fraggamuffin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11582
Patch by Rachel Craik!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@246600 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Adds parsing/sema analysis/serialization/deserialization for array sections in OpenMP constructs (introduced in OpenMP 4.0).
Currently it is allowed to use array sections only in OpenMP clauses that accepts list of expressions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10732
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@245937 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add parsing/sema analysis for 'simdlen' clause in simd directives. Also add check that if both 'safelen' and 'simdlen' clauses are specified, the value of 'simdlen' parameter is less than the value of 'safelen' parameter.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@245692 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
OpenMP 4.1 adds 3 optional modifiers to 'linear' clause.
Format of 'linear' clause has changed to:
```
linear(linear-list[ : linear-step])
```
where linear-list is one of the following
```
list
modifier(list)
```
where modifier is one of the following:
```
ref (C++)
val (C/C++)
uval (C++)
```
Patch adds parsing and sema analysis for these modifiers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@245550 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
OpenMP 4.1 introduces optional argument '(n)' for 'ordered' clause, where 'n' is a number of loops that immediately follow the directive.
'n' must be constant positive integer expressions and it must be less or equal than the number of the loops in the resulting loop nest.
Patch adds parsing and semantic analysis for this optional argument.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@243635 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's possible for TagRedeclarations to involve decls without a name,
ie, anonymous enums. We hit some undefined behaviour if we bind these
null names to the reference here.
We never dereference the name, so it's harmless if it's null - make it
a pointer to allow that.
Fixes the Modules/submodules-merge-defs.cpp test under ubsan.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@241963 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Teach C++'s tentative parsing to handle specializations of Objective-C
class types (e.g., NSArray<NSString *>) as well as Objective-C
protocol qualifiers (id<NSCopying>) by extending type-annotation
tokens to handle this case. As part of this, remove Objective-C
protocol qualifiers from the declaration specifiers, which never
really made sense: instead, provide Sema entry points to make them
part of the type annotation token. Among other things, this properly
diagnoses bogus types such as "<NSCopying> id" which should have been
written as "id <NSCopying>".
Implements template instantiation support for, e.g., NSArray<T>*
in C++. Note that parameterized classes are not templates in the C++
sense, so that cannot (for example) be used as a template argument for
a template template parameter. Part of rdar://problem/6294649.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@241545 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch fixes a crash caused by the following case:
template<typename T>
auto f(T x) {
auto g = [](auto ... args) {
auto h = [args...]() -> int {
return 0;
};
return h;
};
return g;
}
auto x = f(0)();
When the templated function 'f' is instantiated and the inner-most
lambda is transformed the ellipsis location on the captured variable
is lost. Then the lambda returned by 'f' is instantiated and the
tree transformer chokes on the invalid ellipsis location. The
problem is fixed by making a minor change to properly track the
ellipsis location.
This fixes PR23716.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10590
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@240740 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Addresses a conflict with glibc's __nonnull macro by renaming the type
nullability qualifiers as follows:
__nonnull -> _Nonnull
__nullable -> _Nullable
__null_unspecified -> _Null_unspecified
This is the major part of rdar://problem/21530726, but does not yet
provide the Darwin-specific behavior for the old names.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@240596 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Parsing and sema analysis (without support for array sections in arguments) for 'depend' clause (used in 'task' directive, OpenMP 4.0).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@240409 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently if the variable is captured in captured region, capture record for this region stores reference to this variable for future use. But we don't need to provide the reference to the original variable if it was explicitly marked as private in the 'private' clause of the OpenMP construct, this variable is replaced by private copy.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9550
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@240377 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Introduce context-sensitive, non-underscored nullability specifiers
(nonnull, nullable, null_unspecified) for Objective-C method return
types, method parameter types, and properties.
Introduce Objective-C-specific semantics, including computation of the
nullability of the result of a message send, merging of nullability
information from the @interface of a class into its @implementation,
etc .
This is the Objective-C part of rdar://problem/18868820.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@240154 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Introduces the type specifiers __nonnull, __nullable, and
__null_unspecified that describe the nullability of the pointer type
to which the specifier appertains. Nullability type specifiers improve
on the existing nonnull attributes in a few ways:
- They apply to types, so one can represent a pointer to a non-null
pointer, use them in function pointer types, etc.
- As type specifiers, they are syntactically more lightweight than
__attribute__s or [[attribute]]s.
- They can express both the notion of 'should never be null' and
also 'it makes sense for this to be null', and therefore can more
easily catch errors of omission where one forgot to annotate the
nullability of a particular pointer (this will come in a subsequent
patch).
Nullability type specifiers are maintained as type sugar, and
therefore have no effect on mangling, encoding, overloading,
etc. Nonetheless, they will be used for warnings about, e.g., passing
'null' to a method that does not accept it.
This is the C/C++ part of rdar://problem/18868820.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@240146 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Based on previous discussion on the mailing list, clang currently lacks support
for C99 partial re-initialization behavior:
Reference: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-April/029188.html
Reference: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_253.htm
This patch attempts to fix this problem.
Given the following code snippet,
struct P1 { char x[6]; };
struct LP1 { struct P1 p1; };
struct LP1 l = { .p1 = { "foo" }, .p1.x[2] = 'x' };
// this example is adapted from the example for "struct fred x[]" in DR-253;
// currently clang produces in l: { "\0\0x" },
// whereas gcc 4.8 produces { "fox" };
// with this fix, clang will also produce: { "fox" };
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5789
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@239446 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A LambdaCapture does not have sufficient information
to correctly determine whether it is an init-capture or not.
Doing so requires knowledge held in the LambdaExpr itself.
It the case of a nested capture of an init-capture it is not
sufficient to check (as LambdaCapture::isInitCapture did)
whether the associated VarDecl was from an init-capture.
This patch moves isInitCapture to LambdaExpr and updates
Capture->isInitCapture() to Lambda->isInitCapture(Capture).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@236760 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we'd try to perform checks on the captures from the middle of
parsing the lambda's body, at the point where we detected that a variable
needed to be captured. This was wrong in a number of subtle ways. In
PR23334, we couldn't correctly handle the list of potential odr-uses
resulting from the capture, and our attempt to recover from that resulted
in a use-after-free.
We now defer building the initialization expression until we leave the lambda
body and return to the enclosing context, where the initialization does the
right thing. This patch only covers lambda-expressions, but we should apply
the same change to blocks and captured statements too.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@235921 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Since continue, break, return are much more common than __finally, this tries
to keep the work for continue, break, return O(1). Sema keeps a stack of active
__finally scopes (to do this, ActOnSEHFinally() is split into
ActOnStartSEHFinally() and ActOnFinishSEHFinally()), and the various jump
statements then check if the current __finally scope (if present) is deeper
than then destination scope of the jump.
The same warning for goto statements is still missing.
This is the moral equivalent of MSVC's C4532.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@231623 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We would wrongfully reject (a.~A)() in both the destructor and
pseudo-destructor cases.
This fixes PR22668.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@230512 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we would attempt to build a TypeSourceInfo for a null type,
and then we would forget to pop the function scope before returning an
error.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6665
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@224271 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
for lambda expressions. That can't ever work; we need to transform the
parameters in order to create new ones in the new call operator context.
Fixes a rejects-valid when transforming a context containing a
lambda-expression that uses its function parameters in C++14 mode.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@222482 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
This is a re-commit of r219977:
r219977 was reverted in r220038 because it hit a wrong-code bug in GCC 4.7.2.
(That's gcc.gnu.org/PR56135, and affects any implicit lambda-capture of
'this' within a template.)
r219977 was a re-commit of r217995, r218011, and r218053:
r217995 was reverted in r218058 because it hit a rejects-valid bug in MSVC.
(Incorrect overload resolution in the presence of using-declarations.)
It was re-committed in r219977 with a workaround for the MSVC rejects-valid.
r218011 was a workaround for an MSVC parser bug. (Incorrect desugaring of
unbraced range-based for loop).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@221750 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a new form of expression of the form:
(expr op ... op expr)
where one of the exprs is a parameter pack. It expands into
(expr1 op (expr2onwards op ... op expr))
(and likewise if the pack is on the right). The non-pack operand can be
omitted; in that case, an empty pack gives a fallback value or an error,
depending on the operator.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@221573 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DeclarationNameInfo::getInfo() returns reference, but DeclRefExpr::getNameInfo() returns temporary DeclarationNameInfo().
It triggered a local crash for me.
Failing Tests (1):
Clang :: SemaTemplate/instantiate-overload-candidates.cpp
Assertion failed!
Program: bin\clang.EXE
File: clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp, Line 822
Expression: 0 && "Invalid SLocOffset or bad function choice"
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@220841 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
reverted in r218058 because they triggered a rejects-valid bug in MSVC.
Original commit message from r217995:
Instantiate exception specifications when instantiating function types (other
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@219977 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reid Kleckner