We were transforming the scope type of a pseudo-destructor expression
(e.g., the first T in x->T::~T()) as a freestanding type, which meant
that dependent template specialization types here would stay dependent
even when no template parameters were named. This would eventually
mean that a dependent expression would end up in what should be
fully-instantiated ASTs, causing IRgen to assert.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@176723 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The TypeLoc hierarchy used the llvm::cast machinery to perform undefined
behavior by casting pointers/references to TypeLoc objects to derived types
and then using the derived copy constructors (or even returning pointers to
derived types that actually point to the original TypeLoc object).
Some context is in this thread:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-December/056804.html
Though it's spread over a few months which can be hard to read in the mail
archive.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@175462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a template parameter; make that also include one that came from
'auto'. Fixes <rdar://problem/12078752>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@172770 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ActOnFinishFullExpr that some of its checks only apply to discarded-value
expressions. This adds missing checks for unexpanded variadic template
parameter packs to a handful of constructs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@172485 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CXXScalarValueInitExpr (or an ImplicitValueInitExpr), strip it back down to an
empty pair of parentheses so that the initialization code can tell that we're
performing value-initialization.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@170867 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
too). When instantiating a direct-initializer, if we find it has zero
arguments, produce an empty ParenListExpr rather than returning a null
expression.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@170490 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
copy-list-initialization (and doesn't add an additional copy step):
Fill in the ListInitialization bit when creating a CXXConstructExpr. Use it
when instantiating initializers in order to correctly handle instantiation of
copy-list-initialization. Teach TreeTransform that function arguments are
initializations, and so need this special treatment too. Finally, remove some
hacks which were working around SubstInitializer's shortcomings.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@170489 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This does limit these typedefs to being sequences, but no current usage
requires them to be contiguous (we could expand this to a more general
iterator pair range concept at some point).
Also, it'd be nice if SmallVector were constructible directly from an ArrayRef
but this is a bit tricky since ArrayRef depends on SmallVectorBaseImpl for the
inverse conversion. (& generalizing over all range-like things, while nice,
would require some nontrivial SFINAE I haven't thought about yet)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@170482 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@169237 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
determine which member function would be the callee from within the template
definition, don't pass that function as a "non-member function" to
CreateOverloadedBinOp. Instead, just rely on it to select the member function
for itself.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@168818 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
initialization, don't rebuild it. Remove a couple of hacks which were trying to
work around this. Fix the special case for one-argument CXXConstructExprs to
not apply if the one argument is a default argument.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@168582 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
found: if an overloaded operator& is present before a template definition,
the expression &T::foo is represented as a CXXOperatorCallExpr, not as a
UnaryOperator, so we didn't notice that it's permitted to reference a non-static
data member of an unrelated class.
While investigating this, I discovered another problem in this area: we are
treating template default arguments as unevaluated contexts during substitution,
resulting in performing incorrect checks for uses of non-static data members in
C++11. That is not fixed by this patch (I'll look into this soon; it's related
to the failure to correctly instantiate constexpr function templates), but was
resulting in this bug not firing in C++11 mode (except with -Wc++98-compat).
Original message:
PR14124: When performing template instantiation of a qualified-id outside of a
class, diagnose if the qualified-id instantiates to a non-static class member.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@166385 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clang will now honor the FP_CONTRACT pragma and emit LLVM
fmuladd intrinsics for expressions of the form A * B + C (when they occur in a
single statement).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@164989 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
typeid (and a couple other non-standard places where we can transform an
unevaluated expression into an evaluated expression) is special
because it introduces an an expression evaluation context,
which conflicts with the mechanism to compute the current
lambda mangling context. PR12123.
I would appreciate if someone would double-check that we get the mangling
correct with this patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@164658 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
enough information so we can mangle them correctly in cases involving
dependent parameter types. (This specifically impacts cases involving
null pointers and cases involving parameters of reference type.)
Fix the mangler to use this information instead of trying to scavenge
it out of the parameter declaration.
<rdar://problem/12296776>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@164656 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
but can be dereferenced to form an expression which does have viable begin/end
functions, then typo-correct the range, even if something else goes wrong with
the statement (such as inaccessible begin/end or the wrong type of loop
variable).
In order to ensure we recover correctly and produce any followup diagnostics in
this case, redo semantic analysis on the for-range statement outside of the
diagnostic trap, after issuing the typo-correction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@164323 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
definition info; it needs to be there because the mangler needs to
access it before we're finished defining the lambda class.
PR12808.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@164186 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
parameter packs where the reference is not being expanded but the pack has
been. Previously, Clang would segfault in such cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@163672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(__builtin_* etc.) so that it isn't possible to take their address.
Specifically, introduce a new type to represent a reference to a builtin
function, and a new cast kind to convert it to a function pointer in the
operand of a call. Fixes PR13195.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@162962 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These were nops for quite a while and only lead to confusion. ASTMultiPtr
now behaves like a proper dumb array reference.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@162475 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The old error message stating that 'begin' was an undeclared identifier
is replaced with a new message explaining that the error is in the range
expression, along with which of the begin() and end() functions was
problematic if relevant.
Additionally, if the range was a pointer type or defines operator*,
attempt to dereference the range, and offer a FixIt if the modified range
works.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@162248 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
information on FunctionProtoType. (This also fixes one of *many* misalignment
problems in the TypeLoc hierarchy...)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@161901 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Jordan Rose