We don't need a new ExpectedOutputs/ convention. Expected outputs are
just another form of test input.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@339634 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some of the analyzer tests check the exact plist output, in order to
verify that the diagnostics produced is correct.
Current testing setup has many issues:
plist output clobbers tests, making them harder to read
it is impossible to debug test failures given error messages from FileCheck.
The only recourse is manually creating the files and using the diff
again, it is impossible to update the tests given the error message:
the only process is a tedious manual one,
going from a separate plist file to CHECK directives.
This patch offers a much better approach of using "diff" directly in place of FileCheck,
and moving tests to separate files.
Generated using the following script:
```
import os
import glob
import re
import subprocess
diagnostics_key = "// CHECK: <key>diagnostics</key>"
def process_file(f, data):
idx = data.index(diagnostics_key)
plist_out_f = 'ExpectedOutputs/plists/%s.plist' % f
plist_out_folder = os.path.join('ExpectedOutputs/plists/', os.path.dirname(f))
plist_data = data[idx:]
plist_data = plist_data.replace('// CHECK: ', '')
plist_data = plist_data.replace('// CHECK-NEXT: ', '')
plist_data += "</dict>\n</plist>\n"
data = data[:idx]
ptn = re.compile("FileCheck --?input-file(=| )(%t|%t\.plist) %s")
if not ptn.findall(data):
print "none found =/ skipping..."
return
data = ptn.sub(lambda m: "tail -n +11 %s | diff -u -w - %%S/../%s" % (m.group(2), plist_out_f), data)
with open(f, 'w') as out_f:
out_f.write(data)
subprocess.check_call(["mkdir", "-p", plist_out_folder])
with open(plist_out_f, 'w') as out_f:
out_f.write(plist_data)
def main():
files = glob.glob("**/*.*")
for f in files:
with open(f) as f_handler:
data = f_handler.read()
if diagnostics_key in data:
print "Converting %s" %f
process_file(f, data)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50545
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@339475 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rename AlternateExtensive to Extensive.
In 2013, five years ago, we have switched to AlternateExtensive
diagnostics by default, and Extensive was available under unused,
undocumented flag.
This change remove the flag, renames the Alternate
diagnostic to Extensive (as it's no longer Alternate), and ports the
test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47670
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@334524 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The bugreporter::trackNullOrUndefValue() mechanism contains a system of bug
reporter visitors that recursively call each other in order to track where a
null or undefined value came from, where each visitor represents a particular
tracking mechanism (track how the value was stored, track how the value was
returned from a function, track how the value was constrained to null, etc.).
Each visitor is only added once per value it needs to track. Almost. One
exception from this rule would be FindLastStoreBRVisitor that has two operation
modes: it contains a flag that indicates whether null stored values should be
suppressed. Two instances of FindLastStoreBRVisitor with different values of
this flag are considered to be different visitors, so they can be added twice
and produce the same diagnostic twice. This was indeed the case in the affected
test.
With the current logic of this whole machinery, such duplication seems
unavoidable. We should be able to safely add visitors with different flag
values without constructing duplicate diagnostic pieces. Hence the effort
in this commit to de-duplicate diagnostics regardless of what visitors
have produced them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41258
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@321135 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When trying to figure out where a null or undefined value came from,
parentheses and cast expressions are either completely irrelevant, or,
in the case of lvalue-to-rvale cast, straightforwardly lead us in the right
direction when we remove them.
There is a regression that causes a certain diagnostic to appear twice in the
path-notes.cpp test (changed to FIXME). It would be addressed in the next
commit.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41254
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@321133 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds hashes to the plist and html output to be able to identfy bugs
for suppressing false positives or diff results against a baseline. This hash
aims to be resilient for code evolution and is usable to identify bugs in two
different snapshots of the same software. One missing piece however is a
permanent unique identifier of the checker that produces the warning. Once that
issue is resolved, the hashes generated are going to change. Until that point
this feature is marked experimental, but it is suitable for early adoption.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305
Original patch by: Bence Babati!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@251011 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When adding the implicit compound statement (required for Codegen?), the
end location was previously overridden by the start location, probably
based on the assumptions:
* The location of the compound statement should be the member's location
* The compound statement if present is the last element of a FunctionDecl
This patch changes the location of the compound statement to the
member's end location.
Code review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4175
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@211344 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was just left unimplemnted from r191381; the fix is to report this call
location as the location of the 'delete' expr.
PR17746
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@193783 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Per review from Anna, this really should have been two commits, and besides
it's causing problems on our internal buildbot. Reverting until these have
been worked out.
This reverts r184511 / 9812328482.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@184561 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Certain expressions can cause a constructor invocation to zero-initialize
its object even if the constructor itself does no initialization. The
analyzer now handles that before evaluating the call to the constructor,
using the same "default binding" mechanism that calloc() uses, rather
than simply ignoring the zero-initialization flag.
As a bonus, trivial default constructors are now no longer inlined; they
are instead processed explicitly by ExprEngine. This has a (positive)
effect on the generated path edges: they no longer stop at a default
constructor call unless there's a user-provided implementation.
<rdar://problem/14212563>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@184511 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
...but don't yet migrate over the existing plist tests. Some of these
would be trivial to migrate; others could use a bit of inspection first.
In any case, though, the new edge algorithm seems to have proven itself,
and we'd like more coverage (and more usage) of it going forwards.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@183165 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The 2 functions were computing the same location using different logic (each one had edge case bugs that the other
one did not). Refactor them to rely on the same logic.
The location of the warning reported in text/command line output format will now match that of the plist file.
There is one change in the plist output as well. When reporting an error on a BinaryOperator, we use the location of the
operator instead of the beginning of the BinaryOperator expression. This matches our output on command line and
looks better in most cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@180165 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In the committed example, we now see a note that tells us when the pointer
was assumed to be null.
This is the only case in which getDerefExpr returned null (failed to get
the dereferenced expr) throughout our regression tests. (There were multiple
occurrences of this one.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179736 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are few cases where we can track the region, but cannot print the note,
which makes the testing limited. (Though, I’ve tested this manually by making
all regions non-printable.) Even though the applicability is limited now, the enhancement
will be more relevant as we start tracking more regions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179396 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before:
1. Calling 'foo'
2. Doing something interesting
3. Returning from 'foo'
4. Some kind of error here
After:
1. Calling 'foo'
2. Doing something interesting
3. Returning from 'foo'
4. Some kind of error here
The location of the note is already in the caller, not the callee, so this
just brings the "depth" attribute in line with that.
This only affects plist diagnostic consumers (i.e. Xcode). It's necessary
for Xcode to associate the control flow arrows with the right stack frame.
<rdar://problem/13634363>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In this code
int getZero() {
return 0;
}
void test() {
int problem = 1 / getZero(); // expected-warning {{Division by zero}}
}
we generate these arrows:
+-----------------+
| v
int problem = 1 / getZero();
^ |
+---+
where the top one represents the control flow up to the first call, and the
bottom one represents the flow to the division.* It turns out, however, that
we were generating the top arrow twice, as if attempting to "set up context"
after we had already returned from the call. This resulted in poor
highlighting in Xcode.
* Arguably the best location for the division is the '/', but that's a
different problem.
<rdar://problem/13326040>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179350 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Officially in the C++ standard, a null reference cannot exist. However,
it's still very easy to create one:
int &getNullRef() {
int *p = 0;
return *p;
}
We already check that binds to reference regions don't create null references.
This patch checks that we don't create null references by returning, either.
<rdar://problem/13364378>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@176601 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Most map types have an operator[] that inserts a new element if the key
isn't found, then returns a reference to the value slot so that you can
assign into it. However, if the value type is a pointer, it will be
initialized to null. This is usually no problem.
However, if the user /knows/ the map contains a value for a particular key,
they may just use it immediately:
// From ClangSACheckersEmitter.cpp
recordGroupMap[group]->Checkers
In this case the analyzer reports a null dereference on the path where the
key is not in the map, even though the user knows that path is impossible
here. They could silence the warning by adding an assertion, but that means
splitting up the expression and introducing a local variable. (Note that
the analyzer has no way of knowing that recordGroupMap[group] will return
the same reference if called twice in a row!)
We already have logic that says a null dereference has a high chance of
being a false positive if the null came from an inlined function. This
patch simply extends that to references whose rvalues are null as well,
silencing several false positives in LLVM.
<rdar://problem/13239854>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@176371 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before:
Calling implicit default constructor for 'Foo' (where Foo is constructed)
Entered call from 'test' (at "=default" or 'Foo' declaration)
Calling default constructor for 'Bar' (at "=default" or 'Foo' declaration)
After:
Calling implicit default constructor for 'Foo' (where Foo is constructed)
Calling default constructor for 'Bar' (at "=default" or 'Foo' declaration)
This only affects the plist diagnostics; this note is never shown in the
other diagnostics.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@172915 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Mikhail Maltsev