r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before
sorting. This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined
sorting order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of
std::sort.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@328636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
HTML diagnostics can be an overwhelming blob of pages of code.
This patch adds a checkbox which filters this list down to only the
lines *relevant* to the counterexample by e.g. skipping branches which
analyzer has assumed to be infeasible at a time.
The resulting amount of output is much smaller, and often fits on one
screen, and also provides a much more readable diagnostics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41378
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@322612 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This addresses an issue introduced in r183451: since
`removePiecesWithInvalidLocations` is called *after* `adjustCallLocations`,
it is not necessary, and in fact harmful, to have this assertion in
adjustCallLocations.
Addresses rdar://36170689
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41680
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@321682 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The bugreporter::trackNullOrUndefValue() mechanism contains a system of bug
reporter visitors that recursively call each other in order to track where a
null or undefined value came from, where each visitor represents a particular
tracking mechanism (track how the value was stored, track how the value was
returned from a function, track how the value was constrained to null, etc.).
Each visitor is only added once per value it needs to track. Almost. One
exception from this rule would be FindLastStoreBRVisitor that has two operation
modes: it contains a flag that indicates whether null stored values should be
suppressed. Two instances of FindLastStoreBRVisitor with different values of
this flag are considered to be different visitors, so they can be added twice
and produce the same diagnostic twice. This was indeed the case in the affected
test.
With the current logic of this whole machinery, such duplication seems
unavoidable. We should be able to safely add visitors with different flag
values without constructing duplicate diagnostic pieces. Hence the effort
in this commit to de-duplicate diagnostics regardless of what visitors
have produced them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41258
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@321135 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Because since r308957 the suppress-on-sink feature contains its own
mini-analysis, it also needs to become aware that C++ unhandled exceptions
cause sinks. Unfortunately, for now we treat all exceptions as unhandled in
the analyzer, so suppress-on-sink needs to do the same.
rdar://problem/28157554
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35674
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@308961 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If a certain memory leak (or other similar bug) found by the analyzer is known
to be happening only before abnormal termination of the program ("sink", eg.
assertion failure in the code under analysis, or another bug that introduces
undefined behavior), such leak warning is discarded. However, if the analysis
has never reaches completion (due to complexity of the code), it may be
failing to notice the sink.
This commit further extends the partial solution introduced in r290341 to cover
cases when a complicated control flow occurs before encountering a no-return
statement (which anyway inevitably leads to such statement(s)) by traversing
the respective section of the CFG in a depth-first manner. A complete solution
still seems elusive.
rdar://problem/28157554
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35673
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@308957 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In plist output mode with alternate path diagnostics, when entering a function,
we draw an arrow from the caller to the beginning of the callee's declaration.
Upon exiting, however, we draw the arrow from the last statement in the
callee function. The former makes little sense when the declaration is
not a definition, i.e. has no body, which may happen in case the body
is coming from a body farm, eg. Objective-C autosynthesized property accessor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33671
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@304713 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Simplifies and makes explicit the memory ownership model rather than
implicitly passing/acquiring ownership.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@291143 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Warnings with suppress-on-sink are discarded during FlushReports when
BugReporter notices that all paths in ExplodedGraph that pass through the
warning eventually run into a sink node.
However, suppress-on-sink fails to filter out false positives when the analysis
terminates too early - by running into analyzer limits, such as block count
limits or graph size limits - and the interruption hits the narrow window
between throwing the leak report and reaching the no-return function call. In
such case the report is there, however suppression-on-sink doesn't work, because
the sink node was never constructed in the incomplete ExplodedGraph.
This patch implements a very partial solution: also suppress reports thrown
against a statement-node that corresponds to a statement that belongs to a
no-return block of the CFG.
rdar://problem/28832541
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28023
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@290341 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The problem that caused the msvc crash has been indentified and fixed
in the previous commit. This patch contains the rest of r283092.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@283584 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Define PathDiagnosticNotePiece. The next commit would be able to address the
BugReport class code that is pointed to by the msvc crash message.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@283566 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Replace SmallVector<IntrusiveRefCntPtr> with a vector of plain pointers.
Would insignificantly increase memory usage.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@283536 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In the analyzer's path-sensitive reports, when a report goes through a branch
and the branch condition cannot be decided to be definitely true or false
(based on the previous execution path), an event piece is added that tells the
user that a new assumption is added upon the symbolic value of the branch
condition. For example, "Assuming 'a' is equal to 3".
The text of the assumption is hand-crafted in various manners depending on
the AST expression. If the AST expression is too complex and the text of
the assumption fails to be constructed, the event piece is omitted.
This causes loss of information and misunderstanding of the report.
Do not omit the event piece even if the expression is too complex;
add a piece with a generic text instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23300
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@283301 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These diagnostics are separate from the path-sensitive engine's path notes,
and can be added manually on top of path-sensitive or path-insensitive reports.
The new note diagnostics would appear as note:-diagnostic on console and
as blue bubbles in scan-build. In plist files they currently do not appear,
because format needs to be discussed with plist file users.
The analyzer option "-analyzer-config notes-as-events=true" would convert
notes to normal path notes, and put them at the beginning of the path.
This is a temporary hack to show the new notes in plist files.
A few checkers would be updated in subsequent commits,
including tests for this new feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24278
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@283092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This checker checks copy and move assignment operators whether they are
protected against self-assignment. Since C++ core guidelines discourages
explicit checking for `&rhs==this` in general we take a different approach: in
top-frame analysis we branch the exploded graph for two cases, where &rhs==this
and &rhs!=this and let existing checkers (e.g. unix.Malloc) do the rest of the
work. It is important that we check all copy and move assignment operator in top
frame even if we checked them already since self-assignments may happen
undetected even in the same translation unit (e.g. using random indices for an
array what may or may not be the same).
This reapplies r275820 after fixing a string-lifetime issue discovered by the
bots.
A patch by Ádám Balogh!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19311
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@276365 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This checker checks copy and move assignment operators whether they are
protected against self-assignment. Since C++ core guidelines discourages
explicit checking for `&rhs==this` in general we take a different approach: in
top-frame analysis we branch the exploded graph for two cases, where &rhs==this
and &rhs!=this and let existing checkers (e.g. unix.Malloc) do the rest of the
work. It is important that we check all copy and move assignment operator in top
frame even if we checked them already since self-assignments may happen
undetected even in the same translation unit (e.g. using random indices for an
array what may or may not be the same).
A patch by Ádám Balogh!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19311
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@275820 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
During the core analysis, ExplodedNodes are added to the
ExplodedGraph, and those nodes are cached for deduplication purposes.
After core analysis, reports are generated. Here, trimmed copies of
the ExplodedGraph are made. Since the ExplodedGraph has already been
deduplicated, there is no need to deduplicate again.
This change makes it possible to add ExplodedNodes to an
ExplodedGraph without the overhead of deduplication. "Uncached" nodes
also cannot be iterated over, but none of the report generation code
attempts to iterate over all nodes. This change reduces the analysis
time of a large .C file from 3m43.941s to 3m40.256s (~1.6% speedup).
It should slightly reduce memory consumption. Gains should be roughly
proportional to the number (and path length) of static analysis
warnings.
This patch enables future work that should remove the need for an
InterExplodedGraphMap inverse map. I plan on using the (now unused)
ExplodedNode link to connect new nodes to the original nodes.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21229
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@273572 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The analyzer trims unnecessary nodes from the exploded graph before reporting
path diagnostics. However, in some cases it can trim all nodes (including the
error node), leading to an assertion failure (see
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24184).
This commit addresses the issue by adding two new APIs to CheckerContext to
explicitly create error nodes. Unless the client provides a custom tag, these
APIs tag the node with the checker's tag -- preventing it from being trimmed.
The generateErrorNode() method creates a sink error node, while
generateNonFatalErrorNode() creates an error node for a path that should
continue being explored.
The intent is that one of these two methods should be used whenever a checker
creates an error node.
This commit updates the checkers to use these APIs. These APIs
(unlike addTransition() and generateSink()) do not take an explicit Pred node.
This is because there are not any error nodes in the checkers that were created
with an explicit different than the default (the CheckerContext's Pred node).
It also changes generateSink() to require state and pred nodes (previously
these were optional) to reduce confusion.
Additionally, there were several cases where checkers did check whether a
generated node could be null; we now explicitly check for null in these places.
This commit also includes a test case written by Ying Yi as part of
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12163 (that patch originally addressed this issue but
was reverted because it introduced false positive regressions).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12780
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@247859 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@240270 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
FoldingSet, another intrusive data structure that could use some
unique_ptr love on its interfaces. Eventually.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@216764 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I suspect llvm::ilist should take elements by unique_ptr, since it does
take ownership of the element (by stitching it into the linked list) -
one day.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@216761 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Again, if shared ownership is the right model here (I assume it is,
given graph algorithms & such) this could be tidied up (the 'release'
call removed in favor of something safer) by having
IntrunsiveRefCntPointer constructible from a unique_ptr.
(& honestly I'd probably favor taking a page out of shared_ptr's book,
allowing implicit construction from a unique_ptr rvalue, and only allow
explicit from a raw pointer - currently IntrusiveRefCntPointer can
implicitly own from a raw pointer, which seems unsafe)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@216752 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently the analyzer lazily models some functions using 'BodyFarm',
which constructs a fake function implementation that the analyzer
can simulate that approximates the semantics of the function when
it is called. BodyFarm does this by constructing the AST for
such definitions on-the-fly. One strength of BodyFarm
is that all symbols and types referenced by synthesized function
bodies are contextual adapted to the containing translation unit.
The downside is that these ASTs are hardcoded in Clang's own
source code.
A more scalable model is to allow these models to be defined as source
code in separate "model" files and have the analyzer use those
definitions lazily when a function body is needed. Among other things,
it will allow more customization of the analyzer for specific APIs
and platforms.
This patch provides the initial infrastructure for this feature.
It extends BodyFarm to use an abstract API 'CodeInjector' that can be
used to synthesize function bodies. That 'CodeInjector' is
implemented using a new 'ModelInjector' in libFrontend, which lazily
parses a model file and injects the ASTs into the current translation
unit.
Models are currently found by specifying a 'model-path' as an
analyzer option; if no path is specified the CodeInjector is not
used, thus defaulting to the current behavior in the analyzer.
Models currently contain a single function definition, and can
be found by finding the file <function name>.model. This is an
initial starting point for something more rich, but it bootstraps
this feature for future evolution.
This patch was contributed by Gábor Horváth as part of his
Google Summer of Code project.
Some notes:
- This introduces the notion of a "model file" into
FrontendAction and the Preprocessor. This nomenclature
is specific to the static analyzer, but possibly could be
generalized. Essentially these are sources pulled in
exogenously from the principal translation.
Preprocessor gets a 'InitializeForModelFile' and
'FinalizeForModelFile' which could possibly be hoisted out
of Preprocessor if Preprocessor exposed a new API to
change the PragmaHandlers and some other internal pieces. This
can be revisited.
FrontendAction gets a 'isModelParsingAction()' predicate function
used to allow a new FrontendAction to recycle the Preprocessor
and ASTContext. This name could probably be made something
more general (i.e., not tied to 'model files') at the expense
of losing the intent of why it exists. This can be revisited.
- This is a moderate sized patch; it has gone through some amount of
offline code review. Most of the changes to the non-analyzer
parts are fairly small, and would make little sense without
the analyzer changes.
- Most of the analyzer changes are plumbing, with the interesting
behavior being introduced by ModelInjector.cpp and
ModelConsumer.cpp.
- The new functionality introduced by this change is off-by-default.
It requires an analyzer config option to enable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@216550 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Mandeep Singh Grang