copy constructors of classes with array members, instead using
ArrayInitLoopExpr to represent the initialization loop.
This exposed a bug in the static analyzer where it was unable to differentiate
between zero-initialized and unknown array values, which has also been fixed
here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@289618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This solves PR23715 in a way that is compatible with LTO.
MSVC supports jumping to source-level labels and between inline asm
blocks, but we don't.
Also revert the old solution, r255201, which was to mark these calls as
noduplicate.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@288059 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* recurse through intermediate LabelStmts and AttributedStmts when checking
whether a statement inside a switch declares a variable
* if the end of a compound statement is reachable from the chosen case label,
and the compound statement contains a variable declaration, it's not valid
to just emit the contents of the compound statement -- we must emit the
statement itself or we lose the scope (and thus end lifetimes at the wrong
point)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@281797 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When empty (forwarding) basic blocks that are referenced by user labels
are removed, incorrect code may be generated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@276361 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
if (stmt; condition) { ... }
Patch by Anton Bikineev! Some minor formatting and comment tweets by me.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@275350 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Nested if statements can generate empty BBs whose terminator branches
unconditionally to its successor. These branches are not eliminated
to help generate better line number information in some cases, but there
is no reason to keep the empty blocks that result from nested ifs.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, dblaikie, echristo
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11360
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@275115 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse and sema for composite pragma 'distribute parallel for'
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@273884 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21564
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@273705 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
classes.
MSVC actively uses unqualified lookup in dependent bases, lookup at the
instantiation point (non-dependent names may be resolved on things
declared later) etc. and all this stuff is the main cause of
incompatibility between clang and MSVC.
Clang tries to emulate MSVC behavior but it may fail in many cases.
clang could store lexed tokens for member functions definitions within
ClassTemplateDecl for later parsing during template instantiation.
It will allow resolving many possible issues with lookup in dependent
base classes and removing many already existing MSVC-specific
hacks/workarounds from the clang code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@272774 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This is particularly important because a some convergent CUDA intrinsics
(e.g. __shfl_down) are implemented in terms of inline asm.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20836
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@271336 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch is to add parsing and sema support for `target update` directive. Support for the `to` and `from` clauses will be added by a different patch. This patch also adds support for other clauses that are already implemented upstream and apply to `target update`, e.g. `device` and `if`.
This patch is based on the original post by Kelvin Li.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15944
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@270878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Getting accurate locations for loops is important, because those locations are
used by the frontend to generate optimization remarks. Currently, optimization
remarks for loops often appear on the wrong line, often the first line of the
loop body instead of the loop itself. This is confusing because that line might
itself be another loop, or might be somewhere else completely if the body was
an inlined function call. This happens because of the way we find the loop's
starting location. First, we look for a preheader, and if we find one, and its
terminator has a debug location, then we use that. Otherwise, we look for a
location on an instruction in the loop header.
The fallback heuristic is not bad, but will almost always find the beginning of
the body, and not the loop statement itself. The preheader location search
often fails because there's often not a preheader, and even when there is a
preheader, depending on how it was formed, it sometimes carries the location of
some preceeding code.
I don't see any good theoretical way to fix this problem. On the other hand,
this seems like a straightforward solution: Put the debug location in the
loop's llvm.loop metadata. When emitting debug information, this commit causes
us to add the debug location as an operand to each loop's llvm.loop metadata.
Thus, we now generate this metadata for all loops (not just loops with
optimization hints) when we're otherwise generating debug information.
The remark test case changes depend on the companion LLVM commit r270771.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@270772 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch changes cc1 option -fprofile-instr-generate to an enum option
-fprofile-instrument={clang|none}. It also changes cc1 options
-fprofile-instr-generate= to -fprofile-instrument-path=.
The driver level option -fprofile-instr-generate and -fprofile-instr-generate=
remain intact. This change will pave the way to integrate new PGO
instrumentation in IR level.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16730
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@259811 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch adds parsing + sema for the target parallel directive and its clauses along with testcases.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16553
Rebased to current trunk and updated test cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@258832 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clang doesn’t support a use of “this” pointer inside inline asm.
When I tried to compile a class or a struct (see example) with an inline asm that contains "this" pointer.
Clang returns with an error.
This patch fixes that.
error: expected unqualified-id
For example:
'''
struct A {
void f() {
__asm mov eax, this
// error: expected unqualified-id
}
};
'''
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15115
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@255645 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
implicitly-concatenated string literals. When looking for the start of a token
in the inline assembly, start from the end of the previous token, not the start
of the entire string.
Patch by Yunlian Jiang!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@255198 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Constructors and destructors may be represented by several functions
in IR. Only base structors correspond to source code, others are
small pieces of code and eventually call the base variant. In this
case instrumentation of non-base structors has little sense, this
fix remove it. Now profile data of a declaration corresponds to
exactly one function in IR, it agrees with the current logic of the
profile data loading.
This change fixes PR24996.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15158
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@254876 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Richard Smith