than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
This is a re-commit of r219977:
r219977 was reverted in r220038 because it hit a wrong-code bug in GCC 4.7.2.
(That's gcc.gnu.org/PR56135, and affects any implicit lambda-capture of
'this' within a template.)
r219977 was a re-commit of r217995, r218011, and r218053:
r217995 was reverted in r218058 because it hit a rejects-valid bug in MSVC.
(Incorrect overload resolution in the presence of using-declarations.)
It was re-committed in r219977 with a workaround for the MSVC rejects-valid.
r218011 was a workaround for an MSVC parser bug. (Incorrect desugaring of
unbraced range-based for loop).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@221750 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Wire it through everywhere we have support for fastcall, essentially.
This allows us to parse the MSVC "14" CTP headers, but we will
miscompile them because LLVM doesn't support __vectorcall yet.
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5808
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@220573 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clang supports __restrict__ as a function qualifier, but
DeclaratorChunk::FunctionTypeInfo lacked a field to track the qualifier's
source location (as we do with volatile, etc.). This was the subject of a FIXME
in GetFullTypeForDeclarator (in SemaType.cpp). This should also prove useful as
we add more warnings regarding questionable uses of the restrict qualifier.
There is no significant functional change (except for an improved source range
associated with the err_invalid_qualified_function_type diagnostic fixit
generated by GetFullTypeForDeclarator).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@220215 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
reverted in r218058 because they triggered a rejects-valid bug in MSVC.
Original commit message from r217995:
Instantiate exception specifications when instantiating function types (other
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@219977 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This moves some code from SemaType.cpp's hasVisibleDefinition() into
DeclCXX.cpp so that it can be used elsewhere. I found one other instance
of code trying to do the same thing, there are probably more. Search for
getInstantiatedFrom() to try to find more.
No functionality change.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5783
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@219714 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We build a NestedNameSpecifier that records the CXXRecordDecl in which
__super appeared. Name lookup is performed in all base classes of the
recorded CXXRecordDecl. Use of __super is allowed only inside class and
member function scope.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@218484 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r218053: Use exceptions() instead of getNumExceptions()/getExceptionType() to avoid
r218011: Work around MSVC parser bug by putting redundant braces around the body of
r217997: Skip parens when detecting whether we're instantiating a function declaration.
r217995: Instantiate exception specifications when instantiating function types (other
The Windows build was broken for 16 hours and no one had any good ideas of how to
fix it. Reverting for now to make the builders green. See the cfe-commits thread [1] for
more info.
This was the build error (from [2]):
C:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R\llvm-project\clang\lib\Sema\SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp(1590) : error C2668: '`anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator::TransformFunctionProtoType' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
C:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R\llvm-project\clang\lib\Sema\SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp(1313): could be 'clang::QualType `anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator::TransformFunctionProtoType<clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>>(clang::TypeLocBuilder &,clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc,clang::CXXRecordDecl *,unsigned int,Fn)'
with
[
Fn=clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>
]
c:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-r\llvm-project\clang\lib\sema\TreeTransform.h(4532): or 'clang::QualType clang::TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformFunctionProtoType<clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>>(clang::TypeLocBuilder &,clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc,clang::CXXRecordDecl *,unsigned int,Fn)'
with
[
Derived=`anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator,
Fn=clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>
]
while trying to match the argument list '(clang::TypeLocBuilder, clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc, clang::CXXRecordDecl *, unsigned int, clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>)'
1. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140915/115011.html
2. http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R/builds/10515/steps/build_clang_tools_1/logs/stdio
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@218058 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@217995 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ACLE 2.0 allows __fp16 to be used as a function argument or return
type. This enables this for AArch64.
This also fixes an existing bug that causes clang to not allow
homogeneous floating-point aggregates with a base type of __fp16. This
is valid for AAPCS64, but not for AAPCS-VFP.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@216558 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@215982 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, assigning an inheritance model to a derived class would
trigger further assiginments to the various bases of the class. This
was done to fix a bug where we couldn't handle an implicit
base-to-derived conversion for pointers-to-members when the conversion
was ambiguous at an earlier point.
However, this is not how the MS scheme works. Instead, assign
inheritance models to *just* the class which owns to declaration we
ended up referencing.
N.B. This result is surprising in many ways. It means that it is
possible for a base to have a "larger" inheritance model than it's
derived classes. It also means that bases in the conversion path do not
get assigned a model.
struct A { void f(); void f(int); };
struct B : A {};
struct C : B {};
void f() { void (C::*x)() = &A::f; }
We can only begin to assign an inheritance model *after* we've seen the
address-of but *before* we've done the implicit conversion the more
derived pointer-to-member type. After that point, both 'A' and 'C' will
have an inheritance model but 'B' will not. Surprising, right?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@215174 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
FunctionProtoType::ExtProtoInfo. Most of the users of these fields don't care
about the other ExtProtoInfo bits and just want to talk about the exception
specification.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@214450 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In C, it is only known after merging decls if a function with 0 arguments has
a prototype. Fixes PR20386, see that for more notes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@214408 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The main subtlety here is that the Darwin tools still need to be given "-arch
arm64" rather than "-arch aarch64". Fortunately this already goes via a custom
function to handle weird edge-cases in other architectures, and it tested.
I removed a few arm64_be tests because that really isn't an interesting thing
to worry about. No-one using big-endian is also referring to the target as
arm64 (at least as far as toolchains go). Mostly they date from when arm64 was
a separate target and we *did* need a parallel name simply to test it at all.
Now aarch64_be is sufficient.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@213744 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We would silently accept volatile ~S() when the user probably intended
to write virtual ~S().
This fixes PR20238.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@212555 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we would calculate the inheritance model of a class when
requiring a pointer to member type of that class to be complete. The
inheritance model is used to figure out how many fields are used by the
member pointer.
However, once we require a pointer to member of a derived class type to
be complete, we can form pointers to members of bases without
calculating the inheritance model for those bases. This was causing
crashes on this simple test case:
struct A {
void f();
void f(int);
};
struct B : public A {};
void g() { void (B::*a)() = &B::f; }
Now we calculate the inheritance models of all base classes when
completing a member pointer type.
Fixes PR2007.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@210813 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
source that provides a declaration from a hidden module would not have the
visibility of the produced definition checked. This might matter if an
external source chose to import a new module to provide an extra definition,
but is not observable with our current external sources.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@208659 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
whether the definition of the template is visible rather than checking whether
the instantiated definition happens to be in an imported module.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@208150 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I think this is the last commit for ARM64 big endian in clang. This commit makes
arm_neon.h compile correctly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@207624 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds Clang support for the ARM64 backend. There are definitely
still some rough edges, so please bring up any issues you see with
this patch.
As with the LLVM commit though, we think it'll be more useful for
merging with AArch64 from within the tree.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@205100 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clang might crash while reading the precompiled headers if
we don't initialize the AttrEnumOperandLoc properly.
This commit fixes the combination of string attribute
operand and enum operand. Besides, this commit also adds
several assertions to avoid unexpected operand kind.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@203416 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Introduce a notion of a 'current representation method' for
pointers-to-members.
When starting out, this is set to 'best case' (representation method is
chosen by examining the class, selecting the smallest representation
that would work given the class definition or lack thereof).
This pragma allows the translation unit to dictate exactly what
representation to use, similar to how the inheritance model keywords
operate.
N.B. PCH support is forthcoming.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2723
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@201105 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@200082 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@199686 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Richard Smith