--- Reverse-merging r78535 into '.':
D test/Sema/altivec-init.c
U include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
U include/clang/AST/Expr.h
U include/clang/AST/StmtNodes.def
U include/clang/Parse/Parser.h
U include/clang/Parse/Action.h
U tools/clang-cc/clang-cc.cpp
U lib/Frontend/PrintParserCallbacks.cpp
U lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp
U lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
U lib/Sema/Sema.h
U lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
U lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateExpr.cpp
U lib/AST/StmtProfile.cpp
U lib/AST/Expr.cpp
U lib/AST/StmtPrinter.cpp
U lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
U lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@78551 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In addition to being defined by the AltiVec PIM, this is also the vector
initializer syntax used by OpenCL, so that vector literals are compatible
with macro arguments.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@78535 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and __has_trivial_constructor builtin pseudo-functions and
additionally implements __has_trivial_copy and __has_trivial_assign,
from John McCall!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@76916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
templates, such as make<int&>. These template-ids are only barely
functional for function calls; much more to come.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@74563 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
compilation, and (hopefully) introduce RAII objects for changing the
"potentially evaluated" state at all of the necessary places within
Sema and Parser. Other changes:
- Set the unevaluated/potentially-evaluated context appropriately
during template instantiation.
- We now recognize three different states while parsing or
instantiating expressions: unevaluated, potentially evaluated, and
potentially potentially evaluated (for C++'s typeid).
- When we're in a potentially potentially-evaluated context, queue
up MarkDeclarationReferenced calls in a stack. For C++ typeid
expressions that are potentially evaluated, we will play back
these MarkDeclarationReferenced calls when we exit the
corresponding potentially potentially-evaluated context.
- Non-type template arguments are now parsed as constant
expressions, so they are not potentially-evaluated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@73899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
C++. This logic is required to trigger implicit instantiation of
function templates and member functions of class templates, which will
be implemented separately.
This commit includes support for -Wunused-parameter, printing warnings
for named parameters that are not used within a function/Objective-C
method/block. Fixes <rdar://problem/6505209>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@73797 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
redundant functionality. The result (ASTOwningVector) lives in
clang/Parse/Ownership.h and is used by both the parser and semantic
analysis. No intended functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@72214 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
type and argument types are missing, and let return type deduction
happen before we give errors for returning from a noreturn block.
Radar 6441502
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@70413 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This gets rid of a bunch of random InvalidDecl bools in sema, changing
us to use the following approach:
1. When analyzing a declspec or declarator, if an error is found, we
set a bit in Declarator saying that it is invalid.
2. Once the Decl is created by sema, we immediately set the isInvalid
bit on it from what is in the declarator. From this point on, sema
consistently looks at and sets the bit on the decl.
This gives a very clear separation of concerns and simplifies a bunch
of code. In addition to this, this patch makes these changes:
1. it renames DeclSpec::getInvalidType() -> isInvalidType().
2. various "merge" functions no longer return bools: they just set the
invalid bit on the dest decl if invalid.
3. The ActOnTypedefDeclarator/ActOnFunctionDeclarator/ActOnVariableDeclarator
methods now set invalid on the decl returned instead of returning an
invalid bit byref.
4. In SemaType, refering to a typedef that was invalid now propagates the
bit into the resultant type. Stuff declared with the invalid typedef
will now be marked invalid.
5. Various methods like CheckVariableDeclaration now return void and set the
invalid bit on the decl they check.
There are a few minor changes to tests with this, but the only major bad
result is test/SemaCXX/constructor-recovery.cpp. I'll take a look at this
next.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@70020 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
call ActOnBlockError so that CurBlock gets popped. This
fixes a crash on test/block-syntax-error.c when this new
assertion is enabled.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@69464 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Remove an atrocious amount of trailing whitespace in the overloaded operator mangler. Sorry, couldn't help myself.
Change the DeclType parameter of Sema::CheckReferenceInit to be passed by value instead of reference. It wasn't changed anywhere.
Let the parser handle C++'s irregular grammar around assignment-expression and conditional-expression.
And finally, the reason for all this stuff: implement C++ semantics for the conditional operator. The implementation is complete except for determining lvalueness.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@69299 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instantiation for C++ typename-specifiers such as
typename T::type
The parsing of typename-specifiers is relatively easy thanks to
annotation tokens. When we see the "typename", we parse the
typename-specifier and produce a typename annotation token. There are
only a few places where we need to handle this. We currently parse the
typename-specifier form that terminates in an identifier, but not the
simple-template-id form, e.g.,
typename T::template apply<U, V>
Parsing of nested-name-specifiers has a similar problem, since at this
point we don't have any representation of a class template
specialization whose template-name is unknown.
Semantic analysis is only partially complete, with some support for
template instantiation that works for simple examples.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67875 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
know how to recover from an error, we can attach a hint to the
diagnostic that states how to modify the code, which can be one of:
- Insert some new code (a text string) at a particular source
location
- Remove the code within a given range
- Replace the code within a given range with some new code (a text
string)
Right now, we use these hints to annotate diagnostic information. For
example, if one uses the '>>' in a template argument in C++98, as in
this code:
template<int I> class B { };
B<1000 >> 2> *b1;
we'll warn that the behavior will change in C++0x. The fix is to
insert parenthese, so we use code insertion annotations to illustrate
where the parentheses go:
test.cpp:10:10: warning: use of right-shift operator ('>>') in template
argument will require parentheses in C++0x
B<1000 >> 2> *b1;
^
( )
Use of these annotations is partially implemented for HTML
diagnostics, but it's not (yet) producing valid HTML, which may be
related to PR2386, so it has been #if 0'd out.
In this future, we could consider hooking this mechanism up to the
rewriter to actually try to fix these problems during compilation (or,
after a compilation whose only errors have fixes). For now, however, I
suggest that we use these code modification hints whenever we can, so
that we get better diagnostics now and will have better coverage when
we find better ways to use this information.
This also fixes PR3410 by placing the complaint about missing tokens
just after the previous token (rather than at the location of the next
token).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65570 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
vector<vector<double>> Matrix;
In C++98/03, this token always means "right shift". However, if we're in
a context where we know that it can't mean "right shift", provide a
friendly reminder to put a space between the two >'s and then treat it
as two >'s as part of recovery.
In C++0x, this token is always broken into two '>' tokens.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65484 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
us whether there was an error in trying to parse a type-name (type-id
in C++). This allows propagation of errors further in the compiler,
suppressing more bogus error messages.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@64922 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
any named parameters, e.g., this is accepted in C:
void f(...) __attribute__((overloadable));
although this would be rejected:
void f(...);
To do this, moved the checking of the "ellipsis without any named
arguments" condition from the parser into Sema (where it belongs anyway).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@64902 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to a class template. For example, the template-id 'vector<int>' now
has a nice, sugary type in the type system. What we can do now:
- Parse template-ids like 'vector<int>' (where 'vector' names a
class template) and form proper types for them in the type system.
- Parse icky template-ids like 'A<5>' and 'A<(5 > 0)>' properly,
using (sadly) a bool in the parser to tell it whether '>' should
be treated as an operator or not.
This is a baby-step, with major problems and limitations:
- There are currently two ways that we handle template arguments
(whether they are types or expressions). These will be merged, and,
most likely, TemplateArg will disappear.
- We don't have any notion of the declaration of class template
specializations or of template instantiations, so all template-ids
are fancy names for 'int' :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@64153 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Daniel Dunbar