template partial specialization.
In passing, fix the deduction-crash.cpp test to actually run all the tests. Due
to a typo, the last third of the file was being skipped by the parser and some
of the tests were not actually testing anything as a result. Switch from
FileCheck to -verify to make the problem more obvious and prevent this
happening again.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@304604 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When an undeclared identifier in a context that requires a type is followed by
'<', only look for type templates when typo-correcting, tweak the diagnostic
text to say that a template name (not a type name) was undeclared, and parse
the template arguments when recovering from the error.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@302732 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Armed with a much better understanding of what
TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc::initializeArgLocs actually does, I now
understand that it's fine to just use an empty TemplateArgumentLocInfo
for Integral, Declaration, and NullPtr TemplateArguments.
Fixes PR14281. (The testcases are actually derived from libcxx_test in
deduction-crash.cpp because the original testcase was impossible to reduce.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@185038 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
defined here, but not semantically, so
new struct S {};
is always ill-formed, even if there is a struct S in scope.
We also had a couple of bugs in ParseOptionalTypeSpecifier caused by it being
under-loved (due to it only being used in a few places) so merge it into
ParseDeclarationSpecifiers with a new DeclSpecContext. To avoid regressing, this
required improving ParseDeclarationSpecifiers' diagnostics in some cases. This
also required teaching ParseSpecifierQualifierList about constexpr... which
incidentally fixes an issue where we'd allow the constexpr specifier in other
bad places.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@152549 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
in the classification of template names and using declarations. We now
properly typo-correct the leading identifiers in statements to types,
templates, values, etc. As an added bonus, this reduces the number of
lookups required for disambiguation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@130288 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
template specialization types. This also required some parser tweaks,
since we were losing track of the nested-name-specifier's source
location information in several places in the parser. Other notable
changes this required:
- Sema::ActOnTagTemplateIdType now type-checks and forms the
appropriate type nodes (+ source-location information) for an
elaborated-type-specifier ending in a template-id. Previously, we
used a combination of ActOnTemplateIdType and
ActOnTagTemplateIdType that resulted in an ElaboratedType wrapped
around a DependentTemplateSpecializationType, which duplicated the
keyword ("class", "struct", etc.) and nested-name-specifier
storage.
- Sema::ActOnTemplateIdType now gets a nested-name-specifier, which
it places into the returned type-source location information.
- Sema::ActOnDependentTag now creates types with source-location
information.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@126808 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(e.g. due to a broken template argument) following template parameters.
Fixes rdar://problem/8254267
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@109853 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
definition, we're likely going to end up breaking the invariants of
the template system, e.g., that the depths of template parameter lists
match up with the nesting template of the template. So, make sure we
mark such ill-formed declarations as invalid or don't even build them
at all.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@108372 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Alex Lorenz