information is then discarded with a warning to the user that we don't
support it.
This patch gets us one step closer by getting the info down into the
AST in most cases.
Reviewed by: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49865
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@339693 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Recommit of r335084 after revert in r335516.
... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse order, and therefore printed in the wrong order in
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effect, especially on
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attributes' order was changed instead.
This unfortunately causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be
textually after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes
are merged, but are incompatible to each other. Interchanging the role
of the the main and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where
two different declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple
attributes of the same declaration) are merged to be reverse. There is
no easy fix because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@338800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Since The type no longer contains the 'next' item anymore, it isn't a list,
so rename it to ParsedAttr to be more accurate.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@337005 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Basically, "AttributeList" loses all list-like mechanisms, ParsedAttributes is
switched to use a TinyPtrVector (and a ParsedAttributesView is created to
have a non-allocating attributes list). DeclaratorChunk gets the later kind,
Declarator/DeclSpec keep ParsedAttributes.
Iterators are added to the ParsedAttribute types so that for-loops work.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@336945 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@331834 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@329399 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
about unterminated push directives that are followed by a reset
('#pragma pack()')
This has been suggested by Hans Wennborg.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@309559 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@309386 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@309186 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@309106 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@308455 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@308441 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@308327 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch provides a means to specify section-names for global variables,
functions and static variables, using #pragma directives.
This feature is only defined to work sensibly for ELF targets.
One can specify section names as:
#pragma clang section bss="myBSS" data="myData" rodata="myRodata" text="myText"
One can "unspecify" a section name with empty string e.g.
#pragma clang section bss="" data="" text="" rodata=""
Reviewers: Roger Ferrer, Jonathan Roelofs, Reid Kleckner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33412
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@304705 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@300556 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some tests fail on the Windows buildbots. I will have to investigate more.
This commit reverts r300539, r300540 and r300542.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@300543 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@300539 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds the new pragma and the first variant, contract(on/off/fast).
The pragma has the same block scope rules as STDC FP_CONTRACT, i.e. it can be
placed at the beginning of a compound statement or at file scope.
Similarly to STDC FP_CONTRACT there is no need to use attributes. First an
annotate token is inserted with the parsed details of the pragma. Then the
annotate token is parsed in the proper contexts and the Sema is updated with
the corresponding FPOptions using the shared ActOn function with STDC
FP_CONTRACT.
After this the FPOptions from the Sema is propagated into the AST expression
nodes. There is no change here.
I was going to add a 'default' option besides 'on/off/fast' similar to STDC
FP_CONTRACT but then decided against it. I think that we'd have to make option
uppercase then to avoid using 'default' the keyword. Also because of the
scoped activation of pragma I am not sure there is really a need a for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31276
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@299470 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch serializes the state of #pragma pack. It preserves the state of the
pragma from a PCH/from modules in a file that uses that PCH/those modules.
rdar://21359084
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31241
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@299226 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
FPContractModeKind is the codegen option flag which is already ternary (off,
on, fast). This makes it universally the type for the contractable info
across the front-end:
* In FPOptions (i.e. in the Sema + in the expression nodes).
* In LangOpts::DefaultFPContractMode which is the option that initializes
FPOptions in the Sema.
Another way to look at this change is that before fp-contractable on/off were
the only states handled to the front-end:
* For "on", FMA folding was performed by the front-end
* For "fast", we simply forwarded the flag to TargetOptions to handle it in
LLVM
Now off/on/fast are all exposed because for fast we will generate
fast-math-flags during CodeGen.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
---
This is a recommit of r299027 with an adjustment to the test
CodeGenCUDA/fp-contract.cu. The test assumed that even
though -ffp-contract=on is passed FE-based folding of FMA won't happen.
This is obviously wrong since the user is asking for this explicitly with the
option. CUDA is different that -ffp-contract=fast is on by default.
The test used to "work" because contract=fast and contract=on were maintained
separately and we didn't fold in the FE because contract=fast was on due to
the target-default. This patch consolidates the contract=on/fast/off state
into a ternary state hence the change in behavior.
---
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31167
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@299033 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
FPContractModeKind is the codegen option flag which is already ternary (off,
on, fast). This makes it universally the type for the contractable info
across the front-end:
* In FPOptions (i.e. in the Sema + in the expression nodes).
* In LangOpts::DefaultFPContractMode which is the option that initializes
FPOptions in the Sema.
Another way to look at this change is that before fp-contractable on/off were
the only states handled to the front-end:
* For "on", FMA folding was performed by the front-end
* For "fast", we simply forwarded the flag to TargetOptions to handle it in
LLVM
Now off/on/fast are all exposed because for fast we will generate
fast-math-flags during CodeGen.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31167
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@299027 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sema holds the current FPOptions which is adjusted by 'pragma STDC
FP_CONTRACT'. This then gets propagated into expression nodes as they are
built.
This encapsulates FPOptions so that this propagation happens opaquely rather
than directly with the fp_contractable on/off bit. This allows controlled
transitioning of fp_contractable to a ternary value (off, on, fast). It will
also allow adding more fast-math flags later.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31166
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@298877 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Make implementation of #pragma pack consistent with other "stack" pragmas.
Use PragmaStack<> class instead of old representation of internal stack.
Don't change compiler's behavior.
TODO:
1. Introduce diagnostics on popping named slots from pragma stacks.
Reviewer: rnk
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19727
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@268085 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Slightly updated version, double-checked build and tests.
Improve implementation of MS pragmas that use stack + compatibility fixes.
This patch:
1. Changes implementation of #pragma vtordisp to use PragmaStack class
that other stack pragmas use;
2. Fixes "#pragma vtordisp()" behavior - it shouldn't affect the stack;
3. Supports "save-restore" of pragma stacks on enter / exit a C++ method
body, as MSVC does.
TODO:
1. Change implementation of #pragma pack to use the same approach;
2. Introduce diagnostics on popping named stack slots, as MSVC does.
Reviewers:
rnk, thakis
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19361
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@268029 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rework implementation of several MS pragmas that use internal stack:
vtordisp, {bss|code|const|data}_seg.
This patch:
1. Makes #pragma vtordisp use PragmaStack class as *_seg pragmas do;
2. Fixes "#pragma vtordisp()" behavior: it shouldn't affect stack;
3. Saves/restores the stacks on enter/exit a C++ method body.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@267866 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is like r262493, but for pragma detect_mismatch instead of pragma comment.
The two pragmas have similar behavior, so use the same approach for both.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@262506 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
`#pragma comment` was handled by Sema calling a function on ASTConsumer, and
CodeGen then implementing this function and writing things to its output.
Instead, introduce a PragmaCommentDecl AST node and hang one off the
TranslationUnitDecl for every `#pragma comment` line, and then use the regular
serialization machinery. (Since PragmaCommentDecl has codegen relevance, it's
eagerly deserialized.)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17799
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@262493 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Mostly short-circuits some conditionals. Adds target validation of
sections passed to these pragmas.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@231317 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
They cannot be written to, so marking them const makes sense and may improve
optimisation.
As a side-effect, SectionInfos has to be moved from Sema to ASTContext.
It also fixes this problem, that occurs when compiling ATL:
warning LNK4254: section 'ATL' (C0000040) merged into '.rdata' (40000040) with different attributes
The ATL headers are putting variables in a special section that's marked
read-only. However, Clang currently can't model that read-onlyness in the IR.
But, by making the variables const, the section does become read-only, and
the linker warning is avoided.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5812
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@219960 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Test Plan: I noticed this through code inspection. The callers use the return value to remove the SectionAttr if a diagnostic is emitted, but I don't think the failure to do so is observable right now.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5438
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@218265 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This pragma is very rare. We could *hypothetically* lower some uses of
it down to @llvm.global_ctors, but given that GlobalOpt isn't able to
optimize prioritized global ctors today, there's really no point.
If we wanted to do this in the future, I would check if the section used
in the pragma started with ".CRT$XC" and had up to two characters after
it. Those two characters could form the 16-bit initialization priority
that we support in @llvm.global_ctors. We would have to teach LLVM to
lower prioritized global ctors on COFF as well.
This should let us compile some silly uses of this pragma in WebKit /
Blink.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4549
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@213593 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements support for selectively disabling optimizations on a
range of function definitions through a pragma. The implementation is that
all function definitions in the range are decorated with attribute
'optnone'.
#pragma clang optimize off
// All function definitions in here are decorated with 'optnone'.
#pragma clang optimize on
// Compilation resumes as normal.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@209510 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds support for the msvc pragmas section, bss_seg, code_seg,
const_seg and data_seg as well as support for __declspec(allocate()).
Additionally it corrects semantics and adds diagnostics for
__attribute__((section())) and the interaction between the attribute
and the msvc pragmas and declspec. In general conflicts should now be
well diganosed within and among these features.
In supporting the pragmas new machinery for uniform lexing for
msvc pragmas was introduced. The new machinery always lexes the
entire pragma and stores it on an annotation token. The parser
is responsible for parsing the pragma when the handling the
annotation token.
There is a known outstanding bug in this implementation in C mode.
Because these attributes and pragmas apply _only_ to definitions, we
process them at the time we detect a definition. Due to tentative
definitions in C, we end up processing the definition late. This means
that in C mode, everything that ends up in a BSS section will end up in
the _last_ BSS section rather than the one that was live at the time of
tentative definition, even if that turns out to be the point of actual
definition. This issue is not known to impact anything as of yet
because we are not aware of a clear use or use case for #pragma bss_seg
but should be fixed at some point.
Differential Revision=http://reviews.llvm.org/D3065#inline-16241
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@205810 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Kevin P. Neal