When diagnosing taking address of packed members skip __unaligned-qualified expressions

Given that we have already explicitly stated in the qualifier that the
expression is __unaligned, it makes little sense to diagnose that the address
of the packed member may not be aligned.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30884



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@297620 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Roger Ferrer Ibanez 2017-03-13 13:18:21 +00:00
parent d153d73ef4
commit c93ba18c60
2 changed files with 20 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -11851,6 +11851,10 @@ void Sema::RefersToMemberWithReducedAlignment(
if (!ME)
return;
// No need to check expressions with an __unaligned-qualified type.
if (E->getType().getQualifiers().hasUnaligned())
return;
// For a chain of MemberExpr like "a.b.c.d" this list
// will keep FieldDecl's like [d, c, b].
SmallVector<FieldDecl *, 4> ReverseMemberChain;

View File

@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fms-extensions -verify %s
// expected-no-diagnostics
typedef
struct __attribute__((packed)) S1 {
char c0;
int x;
char c1;
} S1;
void bar(__unaligned int *);
void foo(__unaligned S1* s1)
{
bar(&s1->x);
}