![]() Previously unless ZERO_AR_DATE was set to any value, ld64.lld would embed non-hermetic timestamps into the final binary. This flips that default to zero those values unless ZERO_AR_DATE is set explicitly to 0. As far as I know there isn't a downside to this, except that it differs from ld64. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135529 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
index.rst | ||
ld64-vs-lld.rst |