[analyzer] Pass correct bldrCtx to computeObjectUnderConstruction

In case when the prvalue is returned from the function (kind is one
of `SimpleReturnedValueKind`, `CXX17ElidedCopyReturnedValueKind`),
then it construction happens in context of the caller.
We pass `BldrCtx` explicitly, as `currBldrCtx` will always refer to callee
context.

In the following example:
```
struct Result {int value; };
Result create() { return Result{10}; }
int accessValue(Result r) { return r.value; }

void test() {
   for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
      accessValue(create());
}
```

In case when the returned object was constructed directly into the
argument to a function call `accessValue(create())`, this led to
inappropriate value of `blockCount` being used to locate parameter region,
and as a consequence resulting object (from `create()`) was constructed
into a different region, that was later read by inlined invocation of
outer function (`accessValue`).
This manifests itself only in case when calling block is visited more
than once (loop in above example), as otherwise there is no difference
in `blockCount` value between callee and caller context.
This happens only in case when copy elision is disabled (before C++17).

Reviewed By: NoQ

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132030
This commit is contained in:
Tomasz Kamiński 2022-09-26 11:17:41 +02:00
parent 75e90ea766
commit 4ff836a138
6 changed files with 66 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@ -214,8 +214,14 @@ struct NodeBuilderContext {
const CFGBlock *Block;
const LocationContext *LC;
NodeBuilderContext(const CoreEngine &E, const CFGBlock *B,
const LocationContext *L)
: Eng(E), Block(B), LC(L) {
assert(B);
}
NodeBuilderContext(const CoreEngine &E, const CFGBlock *B, ExplodedNode *N)
: Eng(E), Block(B), LC(N->getLocationContext()) { assert(B); }
: NodeBuilderContext(E, B, N->getLocationContext()) {}
/// Return the CFGBlock associated with this builder.
const CFGBlock *getBlock() const { return Block; }

View File

@ -732,6 +732,7 @@ public:
/// A multi-dimensional array is also a continuous memory location in a
/// row major order, so for arr[0][0] Idx is 0 and for arr[2][2] Idx is 8.
SVal computeObjectUnderConstruction(const Expr *E, ProgramStateRef State,
const NodeBuilderContext *BldrCtx,
const LocationContext *LCtx,
const ConstructionContext *CC,
EvalCallOptions &CallOpts,
@ -748,13 +749,13 @@ public:
/// A convenient wrapper around computeObjectUnderConstruction
/// and updateObjectsUnderConstruction.
std::pair<ProgramStateRef, SVal>
handleConstructionContext(const Expr *E, ProgramStateRef State,
const LocationContext *LCtx,
const ConstructionContext *CC,
EvalCallOptions &CallOpts, unsigned Idx = 0) {
std::pair<ProgramStateRef, SVal> handleConstructionContext(
const Expr *E, ProgramStateRef State, const NodeBuilderContext *BldrCtx,
const LocationContext *LCtx, const ConstructionContext *CC,
EvalCallOptions &CallOpts, unsigned Idx = 0) {
SVal V = computeObjectUnderConstruction(E, State, LCtx, CC, CallOpts, Idx);
SVal V = computeObjectUnderConstruction(E, State, BldrCtx, LCtx, CC,
CallOpts, Idx);
State = updateObjectsUnderConstruction(V, E, State, LCtx, CC, CallOpts);
return std::make_pair(State, V);

View File

@ -485,9 +485,9 @@ CallEvent::getReturnValueUnderConstruction() const {
EvalCallOptions CallOpts;
ExprEngine &Engine = getState()->getStateManager().getOwningEngine();
SVal RetVal =
Engine.computeObjectUnderConstruction(getOriginExpr(), getState(),
getLocationContext(), CC, CallOpts);
SVal RetVal = Engine.computeObjectUnderConstruction(
getOriginExpr(), getState(), &Engine.getBuilderContext(),
getLocationContext(), CC, CallOpts);
return RetVal;
}

View File

@ -111,9 +111,15 @@ SVal ExprEngine::makeElementRegion(ProgramStateRef State, SVal LValue,
return LValue;
}
// In case when the prvalue is returned from the function (kind is one of
// SimpleReturnedValueKind, CXX17ElidedCopyReturnedValueKind), then
// it's materialization happens in context of the caller.
// We pass BldrCtx explicitly, as currBldrCtx always refers to callee's context.
SVal ExprEngine::computeObjectUnderConstruction(
const Expr *E, ProgramStateRef State, const LocationContext *LCtx,
const ConstructionContext *CC, EvalCallOptions &CallOpts, unsigned Idx) {
const Expr *E, ProgramStateRef State, const NodeBuilderContext *BldrCtx,
const LocationContext *LCtx, const ConstructionContext *CC,
EvalCallOptions &CallOpts, unsigned Idx) {
SValBuilder &SVB = getSValBuilder();
MemRegionManager &MRMgr = SVB.getRegionManager();
ASTContext &ACtx = SVB.getContext();
@ -210,8 +216,11 @@ SVal ExprEngine::computeObjectUnderConstruction(
CallerLCtx = CallerLCtx->getParent();
assert(!isa<BlockInvocationContext>(CallerLCtx));
}
NodeBuilderContext CallerBldrCtx(getCoreEngine(),
SFC->getCallSiteBlock(), CallerLCtx);
return computeObjectUnderConstruction(
cast<Expr>(SFC->getCallSite()), State, CallerLCtx,
cast<Expr>(SFC->getCallSite()), State, &CallerBldrCtx, CallerLCtx,
RTC->getConstructionContext(), CallOpts);
} else {
// We are on the top frame of the analysis. We do not know where is the
@ -251,7 +260,7 @@ SVal ExprEngine::computeObjectUnderConstruction(
EvalCallOptions PreElideCallOpts = CallOpts;
SVal V = computeObjectUnderConstruction(
TCC->getConstructorAfterElision(), State, LCtx,
TCC->getConstructorAfterElision(), State, BldrCtx, LCtx,
TCC->getConstructionContextAfterElision(), CallOpts);
// FIXME: This definition of "copy elision has not failed" is unreliable.
@ -319,7 +328,7 @@ SVal ExprEngine::computeObjectUnderConstruction(
CallEventManager &CEMgr = getStateManager().getCallEventManager();
auto getArgLoc = [&](CallEventRef<> Caller) -> Optional<SVal> {
const LocationContext *FutureSFC =
Caller->getCalleeStackFrame(currBldrCtx->blockCount());
Caller->getCalleeStackFrame(BldrCtx->blockCount());
// Return early if we are unable to reliably foresee
// the future stack frame.
if (!FutureSFC)
@ -338,7 +347,7 @@ SVal ExprEngine::computeObjectUnderConstruction(
// because this-argument is implemented as a normal argument in
// operator call expressions but not in operator declarations.
const TypedValueRegion *TVR = Caller->getParameterLocation(
*Caller->getAdjustedParameterIndex(Idx), currBldrCtx->blockCount());
*Caller->getAdjustedParameterIndex(Idx), BldrCtx->blockCount());
if (!TVR)
return None;
@ -643,8 +652,8 @@ void ExprEngine::handleConstructor(const Expr *E,
}
// The target region is found from construction context.
std::tie(State, Target) =
handleConstructionContext(CE, State, LCtx, CC, CallOpts, Idx);
std::tie(State, Target) = handleConstructionContext(
CE, State, currBldrCtx, LCtx, CC, CallOpts, Idx);
break;
}
case CXXConstructExpr::CK_VirtualBase: {

View File

@ -774,9 +774,9 @@ ProgramStateRef ExprEngine::bindReturnValue(const CallEvent &Call,
SVal Target;
assert(RTC->getStmt() == Call.getOriginExpr());
EvalCallOptions CallOpts; // FIXME: We won't really need those.
std::tie(State, Target) =
handleConstructionContext(Call.getOriginExpr(), State, LCtx,
RTC->getConstructionContext(), CallOpts);
std::tie(State, Target) = handleConstructionContext(
Call.getOriginExpr(), State, currBldrCtx, LCtx,
RTC->getConstructionContext(), CallOpts);
const MemRegion *TargetR = Target.getAsRegion();
assert(TargetR);
// Invalidate the region so that it didn't look uninitialized. If this is

View File

@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#endif
void clang_analyzer_eval(bool);
void clang_analyzer_dump(int);
namespace variable_functional_cast_crash {
@ -418,3 +419,31 @@ void test_copy_elision() {
}
} // namespace address_vector_tests
namespace arg_directly_from_return_in_loop {
struct Result {
int value;
};
Result create() {
return Result{10};
}
int accessValue(Result r) {
return r.value;
}
void test() {
for (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
int v = accessValue(create());
if (i == 0) {
clang_analyzer_dump(v); // expected-warning {{10 S32b}}
} else {
clang_analyzer_dump(v); // expected-warning {{10 S32b}}
// was {{reg_${{[0-9]+}}<int r.value> }} for C++11
}
}
}
} // namespace arg_directly_from_return_in_loop