This fix is triggered by an error observed on db connection failure on
SupaBase:
```
2024-11-28 07:45:24,724 INFO [DatabaseManager] Starting...
2024-11-28 07:45:24,726 INFO [PID-18|DatabaseManager|Prisma-7f32369c-6432-4edb-8e71-ef820332b9e4] Acquiring connection started...
2024-11-28 07:45:24,726 INFO [PID-18|DatabaseManager|Prisma-7f32369c-6432-4edb-8e71-ef820332b9e4] Acquiring connection completed successfully.
{"is_panic":false,"message":"Can't reach database server at `...pooler.supabase.com:5432`\n\nPlease make sure your database server is running at `....pooler.supabase.com:5432`.","meta":{"database_host":"...pooler.supabase.com","database_port":5432},"error_code":"P1001"}
2024-11-28 07:45:35,153 INFO [PID-18|DatabaseManager|Prisma-7f32369c-6432-4edb-8e71-ef820332b9e4] Acquiring connection failed: Could not connect to the query engine. Retrying now...
2024-11-28 07:45:36,155 INFO [PID-18|DatabaseManager|Redis-e14a33de-2d81-4536-b48b-a8aa4b1f4766] Acquiring connection started...
2024-11-28 07:45:36,181 INFO [PID-18|DatabaseManager|Redis-e14a33de-2d81-4536-b48b-a8aa4b1f4766] Acquiring connection completed successfully.
2024-11-28 07:45:36,183 INFO [PID-18|DatabaseManager|Pyro-2722cd29-4dbd-4cf9-882f-73842658599d] Starting Pyro Service started...
2024-11-28 07:45:36,189 INFO [DatabaseManager] Connected to Pyro; URI = PYRO:DatabaseManager@0.0.0.0:8005
2024-11-28 07:46:28,241 ERROR Error in get_user_integrations: All connection attempts failed
```
Where even
```
2024-11-28 07:45:35,153 INFO [PID-18|DatabaseManager|Prisma-7f32369c-6432-4edb-8e71-ef820332b9e4] Acquiring connection failed: Could not connect to the query engine. Retrying now...
```
is present, the Redis connection is still proceeding without waiting for
the retry to complete. This was likely caused by Tenacity not fully
awaiting the DB connection acquisition command.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add special handling for the async function to explicitly await the
function execution result on each retry.
* Explicitly raise exceptions on `db.connect()` if the db is not
connected even after `prisma.connect()` command.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
This PR adds the first few Hubspot blocks so we can create _real_ sales
and marketing agents.
### Changes 🏗️
Added Hubspot blocks;
- Aded auth for hubspot
- Added Company block
- Added Contact block
- Added Engagement block
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
We've started enabling cost based on the *partial value* of the
`credentials` field. And this logic has never been supported.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add partial object matching on the input data filter for evaluating
the block cost.
* Add missing credentials for `ExtractWebsiteContentBlock`
* Removed fallback cost on LLM blocks.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
Blocks should be easy to search, the name is sometimes not
straightforward, but the description does.
<img width="576" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0528b019-0ebc-4e6f-8a3c-40323a671b13">
### Changes 🏗️
Make the block description searchable.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
* docs(backend): Add `--build` to docker command in Getting Started guide (#8762)
* updated URL on README.md
---------
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
- Add `/integrations/credentials` endpoint which lists all credentials for the authenticated user
- Amend credential fetching logic in front end to fetch all at once instead of per provider
- Resolves#8770
- Resolves (hopefully) #8613
- feat(blocks): Add GitHub Pull Request Trigger block
## feat(platform): Add support for Webhook-triggered blocks
- ⚠️ Add `PLATFORM_BASE_URL` setting
- Add webhook config option and `BlockType.WEBHOOK` to `Block`
- Add check to `Block.__init__` to enforce type and shape of webhook event filter
- Add check to `Block.__init__` to enforce `payload` input on webhook blocks
- Add check to `Block.__init__` to disable webhook blocks if `PLATFORM_BASE_URL` is not set
- Add `Webhook` model + CRUD functions in `backend.data.integrations` to represent webhooks created by our system
- Add `IntegrationWebhook` to DB schema + reference `AgentGraphNode.webhook_id`
- Add `set_node_webhook(..)` in `backend.data.graph`
- Add webhook-related endpoints:
- `POST /integrations/{provider}/webhooks/{webhook_id}/ingress` endpoint, to receive webhook payloads, and for all associated nodes create graph executions
- Add `Node.is_triggered_by_event_type(..)` helper method
- `POST /integrations/{provider}/webhooks/{webhook_id}/ping` endpoint, to allow testing a webhook
- Add `WebhookEvent` + pub/sub functions in `backend.data.integrations`
- Add `backend.integrations.webhooks` module, including:
- `graph_lifecycle_hooks`, e.g. `on_graph_activate(..)`, to handle corresponding webhook creation etc.
- Add calls to these hooks in the graph create/update endpoints
- `BaseWebhooksManager` + `GithubWebhooksManager` to handle creating + registering, removing + deregistering, and retrieving existing webhooks, and validating incoming payloads
## Other improvements
- fix(blocks): Allow having an input and output pin with the same name
- fix(blocks): Add tooltip with description in places where block inputs are rendered without `NodeHandle`
- feat(blocks): Allow hiding inputs (e.g. `payload`) with `SchemaField(hidden=True)`
- fix(frontend): Fix `MultiSelector` component styling
- feat(frontend): Add `AlertDialog` UI component
- feat(frontend): Add `NodeMultiSelectInput` component
- feat(backend/data): Add `NodeModel` with `graph_id`, `graph_version`; `GraphModel` with `user_id`
- Add `make_graph_model(..)` helper function in `backend.data.graph`
- refactor(backend/data): Make `RedisEventQueue` generic and move to `backend.data.execution`
- refactor(frontend): Deduplicate & clean up code for different block types in `generateInputHandles(..)` in `CustomNode`
- dx(backend): Add `MissingConfigError`, `NeedConfirmation` exception
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
* fix: hide content except login when not authenticated to prevent errors
* Remove supabase folder from tracking
* Remove supabase folder from Git tracking
* adding git submodule
* adding git submodule
* Discard changes to .gitignore
* only showing AutoGPT logo if user is not present
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicktindle@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Toran Bruce Richards <toran.richards@gmail.com>
Zamil Majdy